Budget Impact and Cost-Benefit Analyses of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors for Patients With Heart Failure in Thailand.

IF 2.2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-02-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S504819
Poukwan Arunmanakul, Tuangrat Phodha, Sakkarin Pinta-Ay, Mantiwee Nimworapan, Arintaya Phrommintikul, Noppakun Thammatacharee, Piyameth Dilokthornsakul
{"title":"Budget Impact and Cost-Benefit Analyses of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors for Patients With Heart Failure in Thailand.","authors":"Poukwan Arunmanakul, Tuangrat Phodha, Sakkarin Pinta-Ay, Mantiwee Nimworapan, Arintaya Phrommintikul, Noppakun Thammatacharee, Piyameth Dilokthornsakul","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S504819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the budget impact and cost-benefit of incorporating sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) into the benefit package for patients with heart failure (HF) under the universal health coverage (UHC) in Thailand.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A budget impact analysis and cost-benefit model were developed using a five-year time horizon from the payer perspective. Dapagliflozin 10 mg daily or Empagliflozin 10 mg daily was considered as an additional treatment to standard of care (SoC) for patients with HF, under the UHC. Two analytical frameworks were applied: (1) only medicine cost and (2) medicine cost and cost of hospitalization for HF (HHF) and urinary tract infection (UTI) admission as the adverse event of SGLT-2i. The net budget impacts (NBI) were calculated along with the HHF cost reduction and benefit-cost ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NBI in the first year in only medicine cost for dapagliflozin was 12,535 million Thai baht (THB) and that for empagliflozin was 13,265 million THB. The NBIs, when considering HHF and UTI admission costs, were 7661 and 7407 million THB in the first year. The prices of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin should be reduced by 57.13% and 52.07% to reach a budget impact of 500 million THB. The benefit-cost ratio was 0.396 for dapagliflozin and 0.456 for empagliflozin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating SGLT-2i into the UHC would significantly impact the healthcare budget. Policymakers should consider this valuable evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"95-105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844265/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S504819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the budget impact and cost-benefit of incorporating sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) into the benefit package for patients with heart failure (HF) under the universal health coverage (UHC) in Thailand.

Patients and methods: A budget impact analysis and cost-benefit model were developed using a five-year time horizon from the payer perspective. Dapagliflozin 10 mg daily or Empagliflozin 10 mg daily was considered as an additional treatment to standard of care (SoC) for patients with HF, under the UHC. Two analytical frameworks were applied: (1) only medicine cost and (2) medicine cost and cost of hospitalization for HF (HHF) and urinary tract infection (UTI) admission as the adverse event of SGLT-2i. The net budget impacts (NBI) were calculated along with the HHF cost reduction and benefit-cost ratio.

Results: The NBI in the first year in only medicine cost for dapagliflozin was 12,535 million Thai baht (THB) and that for empagliflozin was 13,265 million THB. The NBIs, when considering HHF and UTI admission costs, were 7661 and 7407 million THB in the first year. The prices of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin should be reduced by 57.13% and 52.07% to reach a budget impact of 500 million THB. The benefit-cost ratio was 0.396 for dapagliflozin and 0.456 for empagliflozin.

Conclusion: Incorporating SGLT-2i into the UHC would significantly impact the healthcare budget. Policymakers should consider this valuable evidence.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂对泰国心力衰竭患者的预算影响和成本效益分析
目的:评估将钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT-2i)纳入泰国全民健康保险(UHC)下心力衰竭(HF)患者的福利包的预算影响和成本效益。患者和方法:从支付方的角度,采用五年的时间跨度,开发了预算影响分析和成本效益模型。在UHC下,每日10mg的达格列净或每日10mg的恩帕列净被认为是HF患者标准护理(SoC)的额外治疗。采用两种分析框架:(1)仅将药品费用和(2)将HF (HHF)和尿路感染(UTI)入院的药品费用和住院费用作为SGLT-2i的不良事件。净预算影响(NBI)与HHF成本降低和效益成本比一起计算。结果:达格列净第一年的单药费用NBI为12535亿泰铢(THB),恩格列净第一年的NBI为132.65亿泰铢(THB)。考虑到HHF和UTI的入院费用,第一年的nbi分别为7661和74.07亿泰铢。达格列净和恩格列净的价格应分别降低57.13%和52.07%,以达到5亿泰铢的预算影响。达格列净的效益成本比为0.396,恩格列净的效益成本比为0.456。结论:将SGLT-2i纳入全民健康覆盖将显著影响医疗预算。政策制定者应该考虑这些有价值的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of Drug Cost-Exemption Policy on Treatment Outcomes in Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China: A Nested Case-Control Study. Activity-Based Costing of COVID-19 RT-PCR Testing in Public Laboratories in Indonesia: Evidence for Tariff Setting. Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Utility of Pancreatic Cancer Non-Invasive Test in New-Onset Diabetes. Association Between Willingness to Pay and Quality of Life in Acne Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study with a Nomogram for Individualized Prediction. Trends in Healthcare Costs in Heart Failure and Its Clinical Phenotypes During the Implementation of SGLT2 Inhibitors: A Finnish Registry Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1