Sung-Hyun Cho MD, PhD , Chan-Joo Park MD , Sang-Jae Kim MD , Kyoung-Geun Lee MD , Gyu Rim Baek BS , Ryan Lew BS , Aaron T. Hui BS , Michelle H. McGarry MS , Thay Q. Lee PhD , Jihoon Ok MD , Yang-Soo Kim MD, PhD
{"title":"How important is the teres minor in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty combined with latissimus dorsi transfer?","authors":"Sung-Hyun Cho MD, PhD , Chan-Joo Park MD , Sang-Jae Kim MD , Kyoung-Geun Lee MD , Gyu Rim Baek BS , Ryan Lew BS , Aaron T. Hui BS , Michelle H. McGarry MS , Thay Q. Lee PhD , Jihoon Ok MD , Yang-Soo Kim MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2025.01.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The utility of latissimus dorsi (LD) transfer combined with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty to restore external rotation (ER) strength is clinically well-established, but studies directly comparing LD and intact teres minor (TM) strength are lacking. Also, variations in eccentricity in the glenoid components have been under-estimated.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used 8 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders in this study. LD transfer to the posterolateral aspect of the greater tuberosity was simulated using a cable pulley system. We explored 6 possible conditions: massive rotator cuff tears (RCTs) (supraspinatus and infraspinatus tears), massive RCTs with TM tears, massive RCTs with TM tears and LD transfer, and all 3 conditions complicated by concentric and eccentric glenoid components. We measured the impingement-free range of motion, the ER torque (N∗m), the maximum abduction angle on successive loading of the middle deltoid (the abduction capacities), and the anterior dislocation forces.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Use of an eccentric glenosphere was associated with greater impingement-free range of motion in all directions, but the differences in ER strength, abduction capability, and anterior dislocation force compared with a concentric design were not significant. LD transfer with TM tears showed significantly greater ER strength than massive RCTs condition at 30° (<em>P</em> < .05) and 60° (<em>P</em> < .05) of abduction. TM tears, with or without LD transfer, had less anterior stability than an intact TM (<em>P</em> < .05). Massive RCTs combined with TM tears tended to be associated with an increased abduction angle under the same deltoid load across all tested loads, revealing the key role played by the TM in joint stability and ER.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>LD transfer enhanced ER abduction strength in the absence of an intact TM, in contrast to a massive RCT with an intact TM. The TM was found to play a significant role in stability. Greater range of motion in all directions was achieved with an eccentric rather than with a concentric glenosphere.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":"34 10","pages":"Pages 2497-2506"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274625001703","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The utility of latissimus dorsi (LD) transfer combined with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty to restore external rotation (ER) strength is clinically well-established, but studies directly comparing LD and intact teres minor (TM) strength are lacking. Also, variations in eccentricity in the glenoid components have been under-estimated.
Methods
We used 8 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders in this study. LD transfer to the posterolateral aspect of the greater tuberosity was simulated using a cable pulley system. We explored 6 possible conditions: massive rotator cuff tears (RCTs) (supraspinatus and infraspinatus tears), massive RCTs with TM tears, massive RCTs with TM tears and LD transfer, and all 3 conditions complicated by concentric and eccentric glenoid components. We measured the impingement-free range of motion, the ER torque (N∗m), the maximum abduction angle on successive loading of the middle deltoid (the abduction capacities), and the anterior dislocation forces.
Results
Use of an eccentric glenosphere was associated with greater impingement-free range of motion in all directions, but the differences in ER strength, abduction capability, and anterior dislocation force compared with a concentric design were not significant. LD transfer with TM tears showed significantly greater ER strength than massive RCTs condition at 30° (P < .05) and 60° (P < .05) of abduction. TM tears, with or without LD transfer, had less anterior stability than an intact TM (P < .05). Massive RCTs combined with TM tears tended to be associated with an increased abduction angle under the same deltoid load across all tested loads, revealing the key role played by the TM in joint stability and ER.
Conclusions
LD transfer enhanced ER abduction strength in the absence of an intact TM, in contrast to a massive RCT with an intact TM. The TM was found to play a significant role in stability. Greater range of motion in all directions was achieved with an eccentric rather than with a concentric glenosphere.
期刊介绍:
The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.