How important is the teres minor in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty combined with latissimus dorsi transfer?

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2025.01.028
Sung-Hyun Cho MD, PhD , Chan-Joo Park MD , Sang-Jae Kim MD , Kyoung-Geun Lee MD , Gyu Rim Baek BS , Ryan Lew BS , Aaron T. Hui BS , Michelle H. McGarry MS , Thay Q. Lee PhD , Jihoon Ok MD , Yang-Soo Kim MD, PhD
{"title":"How important is the teres minor in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty combined with latissimus dorsi transfer?","authors":"Sung-Hyun Cho MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Chan-Joo Park MD ,&nbsp;Sang-Jae Kim MD ,&nbsp;Kyoung-Geun Lee MD ,&nbsp;Gyu Rim Baek BS ,&nbsp;Ryan Lew BS ,&nbsp;Aaron T. Hui BS ,&nbsp;Michelle H. McGarry MS ,&nbsp;Thay Q. Lee PhD ,&nbsp;Jihoon Ok MD ,&nbsp;Yang-Soo Kim MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2025.01.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The utility of latissimus dorsi (LD) transfer combined with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty to restore external rotation (ER) strength is clinically well-established, but studies directly comparing LD and intact teres minor (TM) strength are lacking. Also, variations in eccentricity in the glenoid components have been under-estimated.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used 8 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders in this study. LD transfer to the posterolateral aspect of the greater tuberosity was simulated using a cable pulley system. We explored 6 possible conditions: massive rotator cuff tears (RCTs) (supraspinatus and infraspinatus tears), massive RCTs with TM tears, massive RCTs with TM tears and LD transfer, and all 3 conditions complicated by concentric and eccentric glenoid components. We measured the impingement-free range of motion, the ER torque (N∗m), the maximum abduction angle on successive loading of the middle deltoid (the abduction capacities), and the anterior dislocation forces.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Use of an eccentric glenosphere was associated with greater impingement-free range of motion in all directions, but the differences in ER strength, abduction capability, and anterior dislocation force compared with a concentric design were not significant. LD transfer with TM tears showed significantly greater ER strength than massive RCTs condition at 30° (<em>P</em> &lt; .05) and 60° (<em>P</em> &lt; .05) of abduction. TM tears, with or without LD transfer, had less anterior stability than an intact TM (<em>P</em> &lt; .05). Massive RCTs combined with TM tears tended to be associated with an increased abduction angle under the same deltoid load across all tested loads, revealing the key role played by the TM in joint stability and ER.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>LD transfer enhanced ER abduction strength in the absence of an intact TM, in contrast to a massive RCT with an intact TM. The TM was found to play a significant role in stability. Greater range of motion in all directions was achieved with an eccentric rather than with a concentric glenosphere.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":"34 10","pages":"Pages 2497-2506"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274625001703","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The utility of latissimus dorsi (LD) transfer combined with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty to restore external rotation (ER) strength is clinically well-established, but studies directly comparing LD and intact teres minor (TM) strength are lacking. Also, variations in eccentricity in the glenoid components have been under-estimated.

Methods

We used 8 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders in this study. LD transfer to the posterolateral aspect of the greater tuberosity was simulated using a cable pulley system. We explored 6 possible conditions: massive rotator cuff tears (RCTs) (supraspinatus and infraspinatus tears), massive RCTs with TM tears, massive RCTs with TM tears and LD transfer, and all 3 conditions complicated by concentric and eccentric glenoid components. We measured the impingement-free range of motion, the ER torque (N∗m), the maximum abduction angle on successive loading of the middle deltoid (the abduction capacities), and the anterior dislocation forces.

Results

Use of an eccentric glenosphere was associated with greater impingement-free range of motion in all directions, but the differences in ER strength, abduction capability, and anterior dislocation force compared with a concentric design were not significant. LD transfer with TM tears showed significantly greater ER strength than massive RCTs condition at 30° (P < .05) and 60° (P < .05) of abduction. TM tears, with or without LD transfer, had less anterior stability than an intact TM (P < .05). Massive RCTs combined with TM tears tended to be associated with an increased abduction angle under the same deltoid load across all tested loads, revealing the key role played by the TM in joint stability and ER.

Conclusions

LD transfer enhanced ER abduction strength in the absence of an intact TM, in contrast to a massive RCT with an intact TM. The TM was found to play a significant role in stability. Greater range of motion in all directions was achieved with an eccentric rather than with a concentric glenosphere.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小圆肌在逆行全肩关节置换术联合背阔肌转移中有多重要?
背景:背阔肌(LD)转移联合反向全肩关节置换术(rTSA)恢复外旋(ER)力量的应用在临床上已得到证实,但缺乏直接比较LD和完整小圆肌(TM)力量的研究。此外,在关节盂内的偏心率变化也被低估了。方法:采用8例新鲜冷冻尸体肩胛骨为研究对象。使用缆索滑轮系统模拟LD向大结节后外侧的转移。我们探讨了六种可能的情况:大量的肩袖撕裂(冈上肌和冈下肌撕裂),大量的肩袖撕裂,大量的肩袖撕裂和LD转移,所有这三种情况都伴有中心和偏心的肩关节成分。我们测量了无冲击活动范围(IFROM)、内源性扭矩(N*m)、连续加载中三角肌时的最大外展角(外展能力)和前位脱位力。结果:使用偏心关节球在所有方向上都有更大的内陷,但内陷强度、外展能力和前位脱位力与中心设计相比差异不显著。在30°的情况下,带TM撕裂的LD转移比带TM完整的大面积RCT表现出更大的内质网强度(结论:与带TM完整的大面积RCT相比,在没有完整TM的情况下,LD转移增强了内质网外展强度。发现TM在稳定性中起重要作用。偏心关节球比中心关节球在各个方向上的ROM更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Cohort of 101 consecutive Nexel total elbow arthroplasties. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Perioperative Outcomes. Outcomes of Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Utilizing Bulk Femoral Head Allograft with a Monoblock Central Screw Baseplate for Severe Glenoid Defects with Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Quality of surgical technique in patients with a humeral shaft fracture in the HUMMER study (HUMMER-Survey); an international survey among expert surgeons. Revision Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Compared to Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1