Assessment of periprosthetic joint infection in revision shoulder arthroplasty

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2025.01.040
Bryan S. Crook MD, Tom R. Doyle MB, MCh, Mikhail Bethell BS, Samuel G. Lorentz MD, Mark M. Cullen MD, Eoghan T. Hurley MB, MCh, PhD, Jessica L. Seidelman MD, MPH, Thorsten M. Seyler MD, PhD, Oke A. Anakwenze MD, MBA, Christopher S. Klifto MD
{"title":"Assessment of periprosthetic joint infection in revision shoulder arthroplasty","authors":"Bryan S. Crook MD,&nbsp;Tom R. Doyle MB, MCh,&nbsp;Mikhail Bethell BS,&nbsp;Samuel G. Lorentz MD,&nbsp;Mark M. Cullen MD,&nbsp;Eoghan T. Hurley MB, MCh, PhD,&nbsp;Jessica L. Seidelman MD, MPH,&nbsp;Thorsten M. Seyler MD, PhD,&nbsp;Oke A. Anakwenze MD, MBA,&nbsp;Christopher S. Klifto MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2025.01.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In those undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty<span>, the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains challenging with many clinical and diagnostic variables being considered. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the predictive value of pertinent preoperative and intraoperative factors associated with eventual PJI as determined by the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria.</span></div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>All revision shoulder arthroplasties performed at a single tertiary referral medical center from July 2013 to January 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were evaluated as definite, probable, possible or unlikely infection according to the 2018 ICM criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 386 patients underwent revision shoulder arthroplasty, with a mean age of 70 ± 10 years, and 51.3% were female. According to the ICM criteria, 38 patients (9.8%) had definite PJI, 22 had probable PJI (5.7%), 23 had possible PJI (6.0%), and 302 were unlikely to have PJI (78.2%). The majority of patients (n = 71.8%) diagnosed with definitive PJI had 1 major criterion for diagnosis, with all 3 criteria only occurring in 5.1% of these patients. Patients with definite PJI met a mean of 4.6 ± 3.3 minor criteria, and those with probable PJI met a mean of 4.6 ± 2.9 minor criteria. Elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate<span> (ESR) had the highest positive predictive value (PPV; 75.0%) of preoperative laboratory test values collected, whereas elevated synovial white blood cell count and polymorphonuclear leukocyte percentage each had a PPV of 80%.</span></div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The majority of revision shoulder arthroplasties are performed for patients who are unlikely to have a PJI, with less than 10% meeting ICM criteria for definite PJI. Most patients meeting criteria for definite PJI met only 1 major criterion, underscoring the importance of minor criteria in diagnosis. Serum ESR and C-reactive proteinCRP had moderate sensitivity and specificity for PJI, and aspiration may still have value in the standard diagnostic workup of shoulder PJI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":"34 10","pages":"Pages 2431-2437"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274625001843","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In those undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty, the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains challenging with many clinical and diagnostic variables being considered. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the predictive value of pertinent preoperative and intraoperative factors associated with eventual PJI as determined by the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria.

Materials and methods

All revision shoulder arthroplasties performed at a single tertiary referral medical center from July 2013 to January 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were evaluated as definite, probable, possible or unlikely infection according to the 2018 ICM criteria.

Results

Overall, 386 patients underwent revision shoulder arthroplasty, with a mean age of 70 ± 10 years, and 51.3% were female. According to the ICM criteria, 38 patients (9.8%) had definite PJI, 22 had probable PJI (5.7%), 23 had possible PJI (6.0%), and 302 were unlikely to have PJI (78.2%). The majority of patients (n = 71.8%) diagnosed with definitive PJI had 1 major criterion for diagnosis, with all 3 criteria only occurring in 5.1% of these patients. Patients with definite PJI met a mean of 4.6 ± 3.3 minor criteria, and those with probable PJI met a mean of 4.6 ± 2.9 minor criteria. Elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) had the highest positive predictive value (PPV; 75.0%) of preoperative laboratory test values collected, whereas elevated synovial white blood cell count and polymorphonuclear leukocyte percentage each had a PPV of 80%.

Discussion

The majority of revision shoulder arthroplasties are performed for patients who are unlikely to have a PJI, with less than 10% meeting ICM criteria for definite PJI. Most patients meeting criteria for definite PJI met only 1 major criterion, underscoring the importance of minor criteria in diagnosis. Serum ESR and C-reactive proteinCRP had moderate sensitivity and specificity for PJI, and aspiration may still have value in the standard diagnostic workup of shoulder PJI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肩关节翻修成形术中假体周围关节感染的评估。
在接受翻修肩关节置换术的患者中,假体周围关节感染(PJI)的诊断仍然具有挑战性,需要考虑许多临床和诊断变量。该研究的目的是评估2018年国际共识会议(ICM)标准确定的与最终PJI相关的相关术前和术中因素的预测价值。材料与方法:回顾性分析2013年7月至2024年1月在单一三级转诊医疗中心进行的所有翻修肩关节置换术。根据2018年ICM标准对患者进行明确、可能、可能或不太可能感染的评估。结果:总体而言,386例患者接受了翻修肩关节置换术,平均年龄为70±10岁,51.3%为女性。根据ICM诊断标准,明确PJI 38例(9.8%),可能PJI 22例(5.7%),可能PJI 23例(6.0%),不太可能PJI 302例(78.2%)。大多数确诊为PJI的患者(n, 71.8%)有一个主要的诊断标准,只有5.1%的患者出现了所有3个标准。明确PJI患者平均满足4.6±3.3个轻微标准,可能PJI患者平均满足4.6±2.9个轻微标准。ESR升高的患者PPV最高(75.0%),而滑膜白细胞计数和PMN%升高的患者PPV均为80%。讨论:大多数翻修肩关节置换术是为不太可能有PJI的患者进行的,只有不到10%的患者符合ICM确定PJI的标准。大多数符合明确PJI标准的患者仅符合1个主要标准,强调了次要标准在诊断中的重要性。血清ESR和CRP对PJI有中等的敏感性和特异性,吸痰在肩关节PJI的标准诊断中可能仍有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Erratum to "Biomechanical effectiveness of lower trapezius tendon transfer with intercalary tendon-bone graft versus the modified l'Episcopo procedure in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with proximal humeral bone loss [Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2025;35:e69-e79]". Influence of Repetitive Batting on Capitellar Subchondral Bone Density Distribution. The Effect of Glenoid Rotational Malalignment on Best-Fit Circles Based on AI-Generated Mathematically True Glenoid En-Face Views. Bone Densities in Type E3 Glenoids: Quantitative Assessments and Topographical Distributions. Three-Dimensional Characterization of Glenoid Defects in Failed Shoulder Arthroplasties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1