An unclear partnership: key questions about physician and advanced practice provider collaboration in primary care.

IF 2.7 Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2025-01-17 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxaf006
Estelle Martin, Bruce Landon, Joanne Spetz, Susan Edgman-Levitan, Hannah Neprash, David W Bates, Lisa Rotenstein
{"title":"An unclear partnership: key questions about physician and advanced practice provider collaboration in primary care.","authors":"Estelle Martin, Bruce Landon, Joanne Spetz, Susan Edgman-Levitan, Hannah Neprash, David W Bates, Lisa Rotenstein","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>More than 83 million people in the United States live in primary care shortage areas. As the US healthcare system faces a contracting primary care physician workforce, advanced practice providers are playing an increasingly important role in the delivery of primary care services. In parallel, public discourse regarding the differences in care delivery by advanced practice providers versus physicians has also expanded. In this commentary, we describe 3 main evidence gaps hindering optimal physician and advanced practice provider work organization in contemporary primary care delivery: (1) gaps in understanding the unique and overlapping competencies of each role group, (2) gaps in evaluating and defining optimal role delineation, and (3) gaps in payment models supporting effective collaboration. We subsequently present key needs in these 3 areas, including technology-based approaches to track physician and advanced practice provider competencies, increased empirical data on different clinical teaming structures, and exploration of novel models for primary care payment. We also note the need for an enhanced understanding of patient perspectives regarding primary care role types and teaming structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 2","pages":"qxaf006"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

More than 83 million people in the United States live in primary care shortage areas. As the US healthcare system faces a contracting primary care physician workforce, advanced practice providers are playing an increasingly important role in the delivery of primary care services. In parallel, public discourse regarding the differences in care delivery by advanced practice providers versus physicians has also expanded. In this commentary, we describe 3 main evidence gaps hindering optimal physician and advanced practice provider work organization in contemporary primary care delivery: (1) gaps in understanding the unique and overlapping competencies of each role group, (2) gaps in evaluating and defining optimal role delineation, and (3) gaps in payment models supporting effective collaboration. We subsequently present key needs in these 3 areas, including technology-based approaches to track physician and advanced practice provider competencies, increased empirical data on different clinical teaming structures, and exploration of novel models for primary care payment. We also note the need for an enhanced understanding of patient perspectives regarding primary care role types and teaming structures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个不明确的伙伴关系:关于初级保健医生和高级实践提供者合作的关键问题。
美国有超过8300万人生活在初级保健短缺地区。由于美国医疗保健系统面临着一个承包初级保健医生的劳动力,先进的实践提供者在初级保健服务的交付中发挥着越来越重要的作用。与此同时,关于高级实践提供者与医生在护理提供方面的差异的公共话语也在扩大。在这篇评论中,我们描述了阻碍当代初级保健服务中最佳医生和高级实践提供者工作组织的3个主要证据差距:(1)理解每个角色群体独特和重叠能力的差距;(2)评估和定义最佳角色描述的差距;(3)支持有效合作的支付模式的差距。我们随后提出了这三个领域的关键需求,包括基于技术的方法来跟踪医生和高级实践提供者的能力,增加不同临床团队结构的经验数据,以及探索初级保健支付的新模式。我们还注意到需要加强对初级保健角色类型和团队结构的患者观点的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of US government funding freezes on the HIV response: findings from a rapid survey in 32 countries. The timeliness of health plan drug coverage policy changes to FDA label revisions. Correction to: Insulin rationing in states with and without insulin copay caps: a cross-sectional study. Amplifying community perspectives in Medicaid policymaking: findings from North Carolina. FDA approvals of specialty drugs, 2000-2024.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1