Variants of the hybrid distillation/pervaporation process: Conceptual model-based optimization and environmental analysis for IPA dehydration

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Separation and Purification Technology Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2025.132281
Danilo Alexander Figueroa Paredes , Ramiro Julián Sánchez , Daniela Soledad Laoretani , Mauren Fuentes , María Belén Fernández , José Espinosa
{"title":"Variants of the hybrid distillation/pervaporation process: Conceptual model-based optimization and environmental analysis for IPA dehydration","authors":"Danilo Alexander Figueroa Paredes ,&nbsp;Ramiro Julián Sánchez ,&nbsp;Daniela Soledad Laoretani ,&nbsp;Mauren Fuentes ,&nbsp;María Belén Fernández ,&nbsp;José Espinosa","doi":"10.1016/j.seppur.2025.132281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Applied to IPA dehydration, this paper analyses the economic and environmental performance of two variants of the hybrid distillation/pervaporation process operated in batch wise mode; namely, distillation followed by pervaporation with either a polymeric membrane or a ceramic membrane. Both variants are also compared from an environmental standpoint resorting to a life cycle analysis (LCA). Conceptual models of the distillation step and the pervaporation stage were used in doing the performance comparison of variants considering commercial membranes CMC-CF-23 and HybSi. To build the conceptual model for the HybSi membrane, six dehydration experiments were conducted, starting with a feed composition of 80 wt% IPA at three temperatures (70 °C, 80 °C, and 90 °C) and two vacuum levels (3.7 and 6.7 kPa). A permeance model, incorporating the active pore fraction as a parameter, was fitted and showed good agreement with the experimental data. Finally, in order to improve the environmental performance of the distillation/HybSi variant, simulations of the pervaporation task at 90 °C with two vacuum levels (9.7 kPa, 6.7 kPa) consecutively applied were done. This variant was the most attractive from both an economic and environmental point of view. The resulting recovery cost at the optimum was 690 US$ t<sup>−1</sup> and the operation at 90 °C was characterized by a distillate composition of 82 % by weight of IPA, a permeate flux of 2.64 kg m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup> and a permeate composition of 2.7 % IPA by weight. The consecutive condensation temperatures of permeates were 33 °C and 11 °C, respectively. As initially supposed, an enhancement of the environmental performance of this alternative with respect to the others measured from both a life cycle emissions (LCE) perspective and a life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) on human health, ecosystems and resources occurred.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":427,"journal":{"name":"Separation and Purification Technology","volume":"363 ","pages":"Article 132281"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Separation and Purification Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383586625008780","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Applied to IPA dehydration, this paper analyses the economic and environmental performance of two variants of the hybrid distillation/pervaporation process operated in batch wise mode; namely, distillation followed by pervaporation with either a polymeric membrane or a ceramic membrane. Both variants are also compared from an environmental standpoint resorting to a life cycle analysis (LCA). Conceptual models of the distillation step and the pervaporation stage were used in doing the performance comparison of variants considering commercial membranes CMC-CF-23 and HybSi. To build the conceptual model for the HybSi membrane, six dehydration experiments were conducted, starting with a feed composition of 80 wt% IPA at three temperatures (70 °C, 80 °C, and 90 °C) and two vacuum levels (3.7 and 6.7 kPa). A permeance model, incorporating the active pore fraction as a parameter, was fitted and showed good agreement with the experimental data. Finally, in order to improve the environmental performance of the distillation/HybSi variant, simulations of the pervaporation task at 90 °C with two vacuum levels (9.7 kPa, 6.7 kPa) consecutively applied were done. This variant was the most attractive from both an economic and environmental point of view. The resulting recovery cost at the optimum was 690 US$ t−1 and the operation at 90 °C was characterized by a distillate composition of 82 % by weight of IPA, a permeate flux of 2.64 kg m−2 h−1 and a permeate composition of 2.7 % IPA by weight. The consecutive condensation temperatures of permeates were 33 °C and 11 °C, respectively. As initially supposed, an enhancement of the environmental performance of this alternative with respect to the others measured from both a life cycle emissions (LCE) perspective and a life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) on human health, ecosystems and resources occurred.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合蒸馏/渗透蒸发过程的变体:基于概念模型的优化和IPA脱水的环境分析
以IPA脱水为例,分析了两种混合蒸馏/渗透蒸发工艺的经济性和环保性;即,蒸馏后用聚合物膜或陶瓷膜渗透汽化。这两种变体也从环境的角度比较诉诸生命周期分析(LCA)。采用蒸馏阶段和渗透蒸发阶段的概念模型,对商用膜CMC-CF-23和HybSi进行了性能比较。为了建立HybSi膜的概念模型,进行了六次脱水实验,在三种温度(70 °C, 80 °C和90 °C)和两种真空水平(3.7和6.7 kPa)下,以80 wt% IPA的饲料组成为开始。拟合了以活性孔隙分数为参数的渗透率模型,与实验数据吻合较好。最后,为了提高蒸馏/HybSi变体的环境性能,模拟了在90 °C下连续施加两个真空水平(9.7 kPa, 6.7 kPa)的渗透蒸发任务。从经济和环境的角度来看,这种变体是最具吸引力的。最佳回收率为690美元t−1,在90 °C下操作,馏出物的IPA质量比为82 %,渗透通量为2.64 kg m−2 h−1,渗透物的IPA质量比为2.7 %。渗透物的连续冷凝温度分别为33 °C和11 °C。正如最初设想的那样,与从生命周期排放角度和生命周期影响评估对人类健康、生态系统和资源的影响角度衡量的其他替代品相比,这一替代品的环境绩效有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Separation and Purification Technology
Separation and Purification Technology 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
12.80%
发文量
2347
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Separation and Purification Technology is a premier journal committed to sharing innovative methods for separation and purification in chemical and environmental engineering, encompassing both homogeneous solutions and heterogeneous mixtures. Our scope includes the separation and/or purification of liquids, vapors, and gases, as well as carbon capture and separation techniques. However, it's important to note that methods solely intended for analytical purposes are not within the scope of the journal. Additionally, disciplines such as soil science, polymer science, and metallurgy fall outside the purview of Separation and Purification Technology. Join us in advancing the field of separation and purification methods for sustainable solutions in chemical and environmental engineering.
期刊最新文献
Facet-dependent generation of hydroxyl radical from CuFe2O4-mediated H2O2 activation: Enhanced catalytic performance and mechanism insight Engineering low-maintenance one-step nanofiltration for decentralized brackish surface water treatment: Insights in concentration polarization and inorganic-organic foulant interaction Fabrication of cross-linked polyimide membranes via fluorinated styrene-based thermal cross-linking for gas separation Decorating graphitic carbon nitride with rich carbon vacancies from melamine/2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid supramolecular self-assembly for visible-light photocatalytic degradation of ciprofloxacin Kinetic modelling of tomatine extraction from tomato plant waste: influence of solvent, particle size, solvent concentration and solvent ratio
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1