Bottlenecks in establishing the environmental impact of bio-based plastics: A case study of bio-based polyethylene and bio-based polyethylene terephthalate

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Cleaner Production Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145126
Linda Ritzen, Benjamin Sprecher, Conny Bakker, Ruud Balkenende
{"title":"Bottlenecks in establishing the environmental impact of bio-based plastics: A case study of bio-based polyethylene and bio-based polyethylene terephthalate","authors":"Linda Ritzen,&nbsp;Benjamin Sprecher,&nbsp;Conny Bakker,&nbsp;Ruud Balkenende","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bio-based plastics hold the potential to reduce the environmental impact of the plastics industry because they are based on renewable resources instead of petrochemicals. However, life cycle assessment (LCA) studies of bio-based plastics use varied methodologies and have shown large discrepancies, making it difficult to compare outcomes. This article presents an LCA of 31 scenarios for bio-based high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and bio-based polyethylene terephthalate (PET) based on life cycle inventories from literature. The scenarios included various biomass types, production locations and chemical conversion processes. Even the methodologically consistent LCAs yielded large discrepancies in outcomes. Conducting methodologically consistent replications allows us to study the factors that affect the environmental impact of bio-based plastics. Six key factors that contribute to variations were identified. The limited public information and limited scoping of the studied LCAs resulted in life cycle inventories that did not cover all relevant impact categories. A harmonised scope and life cycle impact assessment with more transparent reporting is therefore needed to improve the reliability of bio-based plastic LCAs in the future. A section of the studied LCAs did provide sufficient information to study the effects of bio-based plastic production processes, which yielded the other four factors: biomass type, processing, electricity, and heat. Understanding the factors from practice provides additional information about how bio-based plastics should be developed and how their LCAs should be interpreted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"496 ","pages":"Article 145126"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625004767","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bio-based plastics hold the potential to reduce the environmental impact of the plastics industry because they are based on renewable resources instead of petrochemicals. However, life cycle assessment (LCA) studies of bio-based plastics use varied methodologies and have shown large discrepancies, making it difficult to compare outcomes. This article presents an LCA of 31 scenarios for bio-based high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and bio-based polyethylene terephthalate (PET) based on life cycle inventories from literature. The scenarios included various biomass types, production locations and chemical conversion processes. Even the methodologically consistent LCAs yielded large discrepancies in outcomes. Conducting methodologically consistent replications allows us to study the factors that affect the environmental impact of bio-based plastics. Six key factors that contribute to variations were identified. The limited public information and limited scoping of the studied LCAs resulted in life cycle inventories that did not cover all relevant impact categories. A harmonised scope and life cycle impact assessment with more transparent reporting is therefore needed to improve the reliability of bio-based plastic LCAs in the future. A section of the studied LCAs did provide sufficient information to study the effects of bio-based plastic production processes, which yielded the other four factors: biomass type, processing, electricity, and heat. Understanding the factors from practice provides additional information about how bio-based plastics should be developed and how their LCAs should be interpreted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立生物基塑料对环境影响的瓶颈:生物基聚乙烯和生物基聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯的案例研究
生物基塑料具有减少塑料工业对环境影响的潜力,因为它们是基于可再生资源而不是石化产品。然而,生物基塑料的生命周期评估(LCA)研究使用不同的方法,并显示出很大的差异,使结果难以比较。本文提出了基于文献生命周期清单的31种生物基高密度聚乙烯(HDPE)和生物基聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(PET)的生命周期分析。这些情景包括各种生物质类型、生产地点和化学转化过程。即使是方法学上一致的lca,其结果也存在很大差异。进行方法上一致的复制使我们能够研究影响生物基塑料对环境影响的因素。确定了导致变异的六个关键因素。有限的公开信息和有限的lca研究范围导致生命周期清单没有涵盖所有相关的影响类别。因此,需要一个统一的范围和生命周期影响评估,并提供更透明的报告,以提高未来生物基塑料生命周期评估的可靠性。所研究的lca的一部分确实提供了足够的信息来研究生物基塑料生产过程的影响,从而得出了其他四个因素:生物质类型、加工、电力和热量。从实践中了解这些因素可以为如何开发生物基塑料以及如何解释其lca提供更多信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
期刊最新文献
Magnetic biochar-immobilized enzymatic systems for bioremediation of penicillin G sodium in antibiotic-laden fermentation residues: Removal efficiency, degradation mechanism, and ecological safety Fabricating polyphosphonic acid-based ion exchanger with spatially symmetric structure for efficient removal of uranium Understanding key factors driving circularity in plastic systems through material flow analysis: Findings from Portugal Multifunctional interfacial material for integrated energy-carbon-cost optimization in unconventional petroleum development: A techno-economic-environmental analysis A novel biopolyurethane foam synthesized from Pterocarya stenoptera seed oil and polyethylene glycol and its efficient application for oil-water separation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1