Bottlenecks in establishing the environmental impact of bio-based plastics: a case study of bio-based polyethylene and bio-based polyethylene terephthalate

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Cleaner Production Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145126
Linda Ritzen, Benjamin Sprecher, Conny Bakker, Ruud Balkenende
{"title":"Bottlenecks in establishing the environmental impact of bio-based plastics: a case study of bio-based polyethylene and bio-based polyethylene terephthalate","authors":"Linda Ritzen, Benjamin Sprecher, Conny Bakker, Ruud Balkenende","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bio-based plastics hold the potential to reduce the environmental impact of the plastics industry because they are based on renewable resources instead of petrochemicals. However, life cycle assessment (LCA) studies of bio-based plastics use varied methodologies and have shown large discrepancies, making it difficult to compare outcomes. This article presents an LCA of 31 scenarios for bio-based high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and bio-based polyethylene terephthalate (PET) based on life cycle inventories from literature. The scenarios included various biomass types, production locations and chemical conversion processes. Even the methodologically consistent LCAs yielded large discrepancies in outcomes. Conducting methodologically consistent replications allows us to study the factors that affect the environmental impact of bio-based plastics. Six key factors that contribute to variations were identified. The limited public information and limited scoping of the studied LCAs resulted in life cycle inventories that did not cover all relevant impact categories. A harmonised scope and life cycle impact assessment with more transparent reporting is therefore needed to improve the reliability of bio-based plastic LCAs in the future. A section of the studied LCAs did provide sufficient information to study the effects of bio-based plastic production processes, which yielded the other four factors: biomass type, processing, electricity, and heat. Understanding the factors from practice provides additional information about how bio-based plastics should be developed and how their LCAs should be interpreted.","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145126","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bio-based plastics hold the potential to reduce the environmental impact of the plastics industry because they are based on renewable resources instead of petrochemicals. However, life cycle assessment (LCA) studies of bio-based plastics use varied methodologies and have shown large discrepancies, making it difficult to compare outcomes. This article presents an LCA of 31 scenarios for bio-based high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and bio-based polyethylene terephthalate (PET) based on life cycle inventories from literature. The scenarios included various biomass types, production locations and chemical conversion processes. Even the methodologically consistent LCAs yielded large discrepancies in outcomes. Conducting methodologically consistent replications allows us to study the factors that affect the environmental impact of bio-based plastics. Six key factors that contribute to variations were identified. The limited public information and limited scoping of the studied LCAs resulted in life cycle inventories that did not cover all relevant impact categories. A harmonised scope and life cycle impact assessment with more transparent reporting is therefore needed to improve the reliability of bio-based plastic LCAs in the future. A section of the studied LCAs did provide sufficient information to study the effects of bio-based plastic production processes, which yielded the other four factors: biomass type, processing, electricity, and heat. Understanding the factors from practice provides additional information about how bio-based plastics should be developed and how their LCAs should be interpreted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
期刊最新文献
Enhanced remediation of cadmium-contaminated farmland by smooth vetch (Vicia villosa var.) coupled with phosphorus/sulfur co-doped biochar: Synergetic performance and mechanism Interface molecular mineralization enables green, scalable fabrication of MOF-fabric composites Geospatial extent of CO2 emission of the transportation and the impact of decarbonization policy in Japan Bottlenecks in establishing the environmental impact of bio-based plastics: a case study of bio-based polyethylene and bio-based polyethylene terephthalate Creating a just circular transition: perspectives and contributions from Colombian circular case studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1