Reseeding restoration significantly improves the physical and chemical properties of degraded grassland soil in China—a meta-analysis

IF 5.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Catena Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1016/j.catena.2025.108849
Wentao Mi , Hao Zheng , Yuan Chi , Weibo Ren , Haixuan Zhang , Wanyu Zhang , Feng Yuan , Yaling Liu
{"title":"Reseeding restoration significantly improves the physical and chemical properties of degraded grassland soil in China—a meta-analysis","authors":"Wentao Mi ,&nbsp;Hao Zheng ,&nbsp;Yuan Chi ,&nbsp;Weibo Ren ,&nbsp;Haixuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Wanyu Zhang ,&nbsp;Feng Yuan ,&nbsp;Yaling Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2025.108849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reseeding is widely used to restore degraded grasslands, given its efficiency in yielding a rapid restoration rate and high grassland output. Previous reseeding studies lacked integrated analysis to evaluate the restoration effect of reseeding on degraded grassland. We assessed the impact of reseeding on the restoration of degraded grassland and the influencing factors. Reseeding improved soil physical and chemical properties of degraded grassland, reducing soil bulk density (BD) (−2.18 %) and pH (−3.69 %), while increasing total nitrogen (TN) (11.74 %), total phosphorus (TP) (7.67 %), total potassium (TK) (2.40 %), and water content in soil (WC) (24.62 %). There was also an increase in soil organic carbon (SOC) content (17.94 %), promoting the conversion of degraded grasslands from carbon sources to carbon sinks. Reseeding had the highest and lowest restoration effects on typical grasslands and the Qinghai − Tibet Plateau (QTP). Reseeding significantly increased the WC (64.39 %), SOC (90.54 %), TN (42.50 %), and TP (11.43 %) content in typical grassland soil and reduced BD (−15.21 %). In contrast, reseeding only significantly increased the available potassium (AK) (19.85 %) content of QTP and reduced the soil pH (−2.94 %). Reseeding offered the most effective restoration for surface soil but did not considerably affect deep soil. The restorative impact of reseeding increased with the extent of grassland degradation. Medium- and long-term reseeding had the most significant restoration impact on WC (34.35 % and 65.15 %), TN (27.05 % and 20.47 %), and TP (12.76 % and 16.02 %). We provide new insights into restoring different grasslands with varying degrees of degradation and help with subsequent degraded grassland management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 108849"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816225001511","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reseeding is widely used to restore degraded grasslands, given its efficiency in yielding a rapid restoration rate and high grassland output. Previous reseeding studies lacked integrated analysis to evaluate the restoration effect of reseeding on degraded grassland. We assessed the impact of reseeding on the restoration of degraded grassland and the influencing factors. Reseeding improved soil physical and chemical properties of degraded grassland, reducing soil bulk density (BD) (−2.18 %) and pH (−3.69 %), while increasing total nitrogen (TN) (11.74 %), total phosphorus (TP) (7.67 %), total potassium (TK) (2.40 %), and water content in soil (WC) (24.62 %). There was also an increase in soil organic carbon (SOC) content (17.94 %), promoting the conversion of degraded grasslands from carbon sources to carbon sinks. Reseeding had the highest and lowest restoration effects on typical grasslands and the Qinghai − Tibet Plateau (QTP). Reseeding significantly increased the WC (64.39 %), SOC (90.54 %), TN (42.50 %), and TP (11.43 %) content in typical grassland soil and reduced BD (−15.21 %). In contrast, reseeding only significantly increased the available potassium (AK) (19.85 %) content of QTP and reduced the soil pH (−2.94 %). Reseeding offered the most effective restoration for surface soil but did not considerably affect deep soil. The restorative impact of reseeding increased with the extent of grassland degradation. Medium- and long-term reseeding had the most significant restoration impact on WC (34.35 % and 65.15 %), TN (27.05 % and 20.47 %), and TP (12.76 % and 16.02 %). We provide new insights into restoring different grasslands with varying degrees of degradation and help with subsequent degraded grassland management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复播显著改善了退化草地土壤的理化性质——meta分析
复播具有恢复速度快、草地产量高的优点,被广泛用于退化草地的恢复。以往的复播研究缺乏对退化草地复播恢复效果的综合评价。对退耕还林对退化草地恢复的影响及影响因素进行了评价。复播改善了退化草地土壤理化性质,降低了土壤容重(BD)(- 2.18%)和pH(- 3.69%),提高了土壤全氮(TN)(11.74%)、全磷(TP)(7.67%)、全钾(TK)(2.40%)和土壤含水量(WC)(24.62%)。土壤有机碳(SOC)含量增加(17.94%),促进了退化草地由碳源向碳汇的转化。在典型草地和青藏高原,补播的恢复效果最高和最低。补播显著提高了典型草地土壤的WC(64.39%)、SOC(90.54%)、TN(42.50%)和TP(11.43%)含量,降低了BD(- 15.21%)。补播仅显著提高了QTP速效钾(AK)含量(19.85%),降低了土壤pH(- 2.94%)。补播对表层土壤恢复效果最好,但对深层土壤恢复效果不明显。随着草地退化程度的增加,补种的恢复作用逐渐增强。中期和长期补播对水分、全氮和总磷的恢复效果分别为34.35%和65.15%、27.05%和20.47%,分别为12.76%和16.02%。为不同退化程度草地的恢复提供了新的思路,为后续退化草地的管理提供了帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
期刊最新文献
Mineralogical control and landscape influence on chromium and nickel distribution and bioavailability in tropical ultramafic soils Integrating ecosystem adaptability into drought resilience assessment: a case study of the Yellow River Basin, China Responses of sedimentary magnetic susceptibility and metal contents to climate and anthropogenic activity changes: examination on lake records across the Asian monsoon region Inundation increases wetland soil organic carbon through microbial necromass rather than plant lignin components Spatial variability and drivers of soil organic carbon burial in the tidal flats of the Yellow River Delta
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1