Optimizing osteoarthritis care through clinical and community partnership: Results of an exploratory trial

Kelli D. Allen , Liubov Arbeeva , Leigh F. Callahan , Katherine Combs , Tamara Godfrey , Yvonne M. Golightly , Derek Hales , Carla Hill , Katie F. Huffman , Amanda E. Nelson , Jennifer Rees , Todd A. Schwartz
{"title":"Optimizing osteoarthritis care through clinical and community partnership: Results of an exploratory trial","authors":"Kelli D. Allen ,&nbsp;Liubov Arbeeva ,&nbsp;Leigh F. Callahan ,&nbsp;Katherine Combs ,&nbsp;Tamara Godfrey ,&nbsp;Yvonne M. Golightly ,&nbsp;Derek Hales ,&nbsp;Carla Hill ,&nbsp;Katie F. Huffman ,&nbsp;Amanda E. Nelson ,&nbsp;Jennifer Rees ,&nbsp;Todd A. Schwartz","doi":"10.1016/j.ocarto.2025.100588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/Purpose</h3><div>To conduct an exploratory trial of a clinic-community care model (OA CARE) for managing osteoarthritis (OA).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Participants (n ​= ​60) with symptomatic knee or hip OA and overweight/obesity were randomized to OA CARE or a usual care control group (UC). Participants in the OA CARE group received a 12-month medical membership to a local YMCA, which included a 12-week weight loss program and access to exercise programming, as well as referrals to rehabilitation, nutrition, sleep-related and psychological services. Participants’ primary care clinicians were given a video-based summary of OA treatment guidelines. Feasibility metrics included engagement with the weight loss program and exercise resources. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6-months and 12-months. The primary outcome was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Outcomes were analyzed between groups across time points using general linear mixed models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighty-seven percent of the OA CARE group participated in the weight loss program, with a mean attendance of 9.2 sessions; 57 ​% participated in an exercise class. At 6-months, there was a statistically significant between-group difference in change in WOMAC total scores, with the OA CARE group showing greater improvement (−11.0, 95 ​% Confidence Interval −20.1, −1.9). At 12-months, the between-group change in WOMAC score was not statistically significant, though there was a small difference in favor of OA CARE Group (−4.9, 95 ​% Confidence Interval −14.1, 4.3).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Feasibility metrics were positive, but effects of OA CARE were modest, and a more intensive approach may be needed to enhance impacts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74377,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100588"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266591312500024X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Purpose

To conduct an exploratory trial of a clinic-community care model (OA CARE) for managing osteoarthritis (OA).

Design

Participants (n ​= ​60) with symptomatic knee or hip OA and overweight/obesity were randomized to OA CARE or a usual care control group (UC). Participants in the OA CARE group received a 12-month medical membership to a local YMCA, which included a 12-week weight loss program and access to exercise programming, as well as referrals to rehabilitation, nutrition, sleep-related and psychological services. Participants’ primary care clinicians were given a video-based summary of OA treatment guidelines. Feasibility metrics included engagement with the weight loss program and exercise resources. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6-months and 12-months. The primary outcome was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Outcomes were analyzed between groups across time points using general linear mixed models.

Results

Eighty-seven percent of the OA CARE group participated in the weight loss program, with a mean attendance of 9.2 sessions; 57 ​% participated in an exercise class. At 6-months, there was a statistically significant between-group difference in change in WOMAC total scores, with the OA CARE group showing greater improvement (−11.0, 95 ​% Confidence Interval −20.1, −1.9). At 12-months, the between-group change in WOMAC score was not statistically significant, though there was a small difference in favor of OA CARE Group (−4.9, 95 ​% Confidence Interval −14.1, 4.3).

Conclusion

Feasibility metrics were positive, but effects of OA CARE were modest, and a more intensive approach may be needed to enhance impacts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimizing osteoarthritis care through clinical and community partnership: Results of an exploratory trial Contralateral knee osteoarthritis severity relates to magnetic resonance imaging findings in knees with and without osteoarthritis: Data from the osteoarthritis initiative Acknowledgement to Reviewers 2024 Predictive validity of consensus-based MRI definition of osteoarthritis plus radiographic osteoarthritis for the progression of knee osteoarthritis: A longitudinal cohort study Perceived barriers and facilitators to exercise adherence in osteoarthritis: A thematic synthesis of qualitative studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1