Where can automated mobility-on-demand service thrive: A combined method of latent class choice and random forest

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transport Policy Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.02.019
Jaehyung Lee, Jinhee Kim
{"title":"Where can automated mobility-on-demand service thrive: A combined method of latent class choice and random forest","authors":"Jaehyung Lee,&nbsp;Jinhee Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.02.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transportation systems have reached a tipping point with autonomous driving technologies and innovative mobility services. There are a growing number of studies related to factors affecting the preference for automated mobility-on-demand mobility (AMoD) services. However, the various factors affecting the heterogeneity of autonomous driving services have not been thoroughly explored. Therefore, this study aimed to scrutinize the factors affecting the taste heterogeneity of autonomous driving services. A combined method of a latent class model and a random forest was suggested to overcome the overparameterization problem in a latent class model. The proposed model allows us to consider a wide range of variables affecting mode preferences at once, while it is challenging to interpret the direction and the magnitude of impact or heterogeneity compared to the latent class model. Therefore, the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) was employed to interpret the results of the random forest. To investigate a variety of factors, two datasets, which are data including stated choice preferences, demographics, and attitudinal indicators from online questionnaire and regional characteristics from Statistics Korea, were combined based on the residential addresses of respondents. The latent class model revealed six classes based on transport mode preference. This suggests that there is taste heterogeneity in the preference for AMoD. SHAP analysis identified the magnitude and direction of the impact of the factors influencing taste heterogeneity for AMoD. The findings of this study can contribute to establishing transportation policies for autonomous vehicle diffusion and selection of pilot districts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"165 ","pages":"Pages 127-149"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25000848","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transportation systems have reached a tipping point with autonomous driving technologies and innovative mobility services. There are a growing number of studies related to factors affecting the preference for automated mobility-on-demand mobility (AMoD) services. However, the various factors affecting the heterogeneity of autonomous driving services have not been thoroughly explored. Therefore, this study aimed to scrutinize the factors affecting the taste heterogeneity of autonomous driving services. A combined method of a latent class model and a random forest was suggested to overcome the overparameterization problem in a latent class model. The proposed model allows us to consider a wide range of variables affecting mode preferences at once, while it is challenging to interpret the direction and the magnitude of impact or heterogeneity compared to the latent class model. Therefore, the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) was employed to interpret the results of the random forest. To investigate a variety of factors, two datasets, which are data including stated choice preferences, demographics, and attitudinal indicators from online questionnaire and regional characteristics from Statistics Korea, were combined based on the residential addresses of respondents. The latent class model revealed six classes based on transport mode preference. This suggests that there is taste heterogeneity in the preference for AMoD. SHAP analysis identified the magnitude and direction of the impact of the factors influencing taste heterogeneity for AMoD. The findings of this study can contribute to establishing transportation policies for autonomous vehicle diffusion and selection of pilot districts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
期刊最新文献
Where can automated mobility-on-demand service thrive: A combined method of latent class choice and random forest Editorial Board Unified merger list in the container shipping industry from 1966 to 2022: A structural estimation of M&A matching Understanding public perceptions of autonomous vehicles: A structural model to urban-rural differences and psychological factors Maritime emissions trading in the EU: Systematic literature review and policy assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1