CFD multiphase modeling of liquid–liquid hydrocyclones: A review

IF 5.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jiec.2024.10.044
J.P.S. Oliveira, R.A. Medronho, F.P. Santos, T.S. Klein
{"title":"CFD multiphase modeling of liquid–liquid hydrocyclones: A review","authors":"J.P.S. Oliveira,&nbsp;R.A. Medronho,&nbsp;F.P. Santos,&nbsp;T.S. Klein","doi":"10.1016/j.jiec.2024.10.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present study aims to provide a state-of-the-art review of the multiphase CFD simulations of hydrocyclones in the scope of the Euler–Euler approach. It has been shown that, as far as turbulence is concerned, most works point to a full-closure RANS approach to account for curvature effects. There are distinct approaches for conducting these simulations, and their suitability strongly depends on the analysis’ goal. Most of the reported Euler–Euler simulations utilize a full two-fluid model or a simplified mixture formulation. The current status of multiphase treatments applied to liquid–liquid hydrocyclones (LLHC) relies on a coupled approach between CFD and a population balance model (PBM), with few attempts so far limited to the mixture model associated with discrete PBE solution methods. Multiphase macro-strategies were identified (individual monodispersed, serial monodispersed, and polydispersed simulations). By analyzing a set of representative studies, a guide for defining a multiphase strategy is proposed according to inlet feed stream properties. Valuable insights on the suitability of commonly adopted multiphase strategies were gained in light of estimating a phase coupling parameter. The polydisperse Euler–Euler model returned broader agreements with empirical efficiencies for intermediary couplings for solid–liquid scenarios. Moreover, liquid–liquid cases showed dependency on including PBM source terms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":363,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry","volume":"145 ","pages":"Pages 33-62"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1226086X24007032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aims to provide a state-of-the-art review of the multiphase CFD simulations of hydrocyclones in the scope of the Euler–Euler approach. It has been shown that, as far as turbulence is concerned, most works point to a full-closure RANS approach to account for curvature effects. There are distinct approaches for conducting these simulations, and their suitability strongly depends on the analysis’ goal. Most of the reported Euler–Euler simulations utilize a full two-fluid model or a simplified mixture formulation. The current status of multiphase treatments applied to liquid–liquid hydrocyclones (LLHC) relies on a coupled approach between CFD and a population balance model (PBM), with few attempts so far limited to the mixture model associated with discrete PBE solution methods. Multiphase macro-strategies were identified (individual monodispersed, serial monodispersed, and polydispersed simulations). By analyzing a set of representative studies, a guide for defining a multiphase strategy is proposed according to inlet feed stream properties. Valuable insights on the suitability of commonly adopted multiphase strategies were gained in light of estimating a phase coupling parameter. The polydisperse Euler–Euler model returned broader agreements with empirical efficiencies for intermediary couplings for solid–liquid scenarios. Moreover, liquid–liquid cases showed dependency on including PBM source terms.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
液-液旋流器的CFD多相建模研究进展
本研究的目的是在欧拉-欧拉方法的范围内对水力旋流器的多相CFD模拟进行最新的回顾。已经证明,就湍流而言,大多数工作都指向一个完全闭合的RANS方法来解释曲率效应。进行这些模拟有不同的方法,它们的适用性很大程度上取决于分析的目标。大多数报道的欧拉-欧拉模拟使用完整的双流体模型或简化的混合公式。目前用于液-液旋流器(LLHC)的多相处理依赖于CFD和种群平衡模型(PBM)之间的耦合方法,迄今为止很少有尝试局限于与离散PBE溶液方法相关的混合模型。确定了多相宏观策略(单个单分散、序列单分散和多分散模拟)。通过分析一系列具有代表性的研究,提出了一种根据进料流特性确定多相策略的指导原则。根据相位耦合参数的估计,对常用的多相策略的适用性有了有价值的见解。多分散欧拉-欧拉模型与固体-液体情景中间耦合的经验效率更为一致。此外,液-液情况显示出对PBM源项的依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
6.60%
发文量
639
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry is published monthly in English by the Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. JIEC brings together multidisciplinary interests in one journal and is to disseminate information on all aspects of research and development in industrial and engineering chemistry. Contributions in the form of research articles, short communications, notes and reviews are considered for publication. The editors welcome original contributions that have not been and are not to be published elsewhere. Instruction to authors and a manuscript submissions form are printed at the end of each issue. Bulk reprints of individual articles can be ordered. This publication is partially supported by Korea Research Foundation and the Korean Federation of Science and Technology Societies.
期刊最新文献
Effects of oxidized dextrin on flotation behavior of scheelite and calcite: experimental tests and DFT calculations Metal sulfide-based photocatalysts applied in CO2 photocatalytic reduction:Current status and future perspectives Dual optical detection of norepinephrine with hydrothermally synthesized nitrogen-doped MXene quantum dots Editorial Board Methane-promoted porous media burner for efficient ammonia combustion and low-carbon conversion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1