Dana Buršíková Brabcová , Jiří Kohout , Ivana Mašková , Kateřina Lohrová
{"title":"Evaluating the effectiveness of two video-based educational interventions to enhance knowledge about epilepsy in preschool children","authors":"Dana Buršíková Brabcová , Jiří Kohout , Ivana Mašková , Kateřina Lohrová","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Current research affirms that sufficiently high knowledge about epilepsy is crucial for reducing stigmatization and improving the quality of life for people with epilepsy. While educational interventions targeting older children, adolescents, and adults are relatively common, there is a notable lack of approaches suitable for preschool children. Building on our previous research, which focused on educational interventions using a game and a story, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of two video-based interventions, <em>Campi the Seahorse</em> and <em>Adventure While Fishing</em>, in children aged 5–6 years with no prior knowledge about epilepsy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 199 children participated in two intervention studies. Knowledge about epilepsy was assessed through interviews using an 11-item test that had been successfully employed in our previous intervention studies, demonstrating satisfactory internal consistency and construct validity. The level of knowledge was evaluated immediately after each intervention and one month later. Additionally, satisfaction with the intervention and its potential impact on epilepsy-related stigma were measured using a smiley-face scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The <em>Adventure While Fishing</em> intervention demonstrated notable effectiveness compared to our previously developed intervention using an educational story. Its impact was also significant when compared to the level of knowledge observed in children aged 9–11 years with no prior exposure to epilepsy-related interventions. In contrast, the outcomes of the <em>Campi the Seahorse</em> intervention were significantly poorer across all comparisons, likely due to its insufficient coverage of key aspects of the topic.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results indicated that the <em>Adventure While Fishing</em> intervention was an effective approach to establishing basic knowledge about epilepsy within the targeted age group. In contrast, the <em>Campi the Seahorse</em> intervention would require further extension and/or modification to achieve sufficient effectiveness for this purpose.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 110339"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025000782","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Current research affirms that sufficiently high knowledge about epilepsy is crucial for reducing stigmatization and improving the quality of life for people with epilepsy. While educational interventions targeting older children, adolescents, and adults are relatively common, there is a notable lack of approaches suitable for preschool children. Building on our previous research, which focused on educational interventions using a game and a story, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of two video-based interventions, Campi the Seahorse and Adventure While Fishing, in children aged 5–6 years with no prior knowledge about epilepsy.
Methods
A total of 199 children participated in two intervention studies. Knowledge about epilepsy was assessed through interviews using an 11-item test that had been successfully employed in our previous intervention studies, demonstrating satisfactory internal consistency and construct validity. The level of knowledge was evaluated immediately after each intervention and one month later. Additionally, satisfaction with the intervention and its potential impact on epilepsy-related stigma were measured using a smiley-face scale.
Results
The Adventure While Fishing intervention demonstrated notable effectiveness compared to our previously developed intervention using an educational story. Its impact was also significant when compared to the level of knowledge observed in children aged 9–11 years with no prior exposure to epilepsy-related interventions. In contrast, the outcomes of the Campi the Seahorse intervention were significantly poorer across all comparisons, likely due to its insufficient coverage of key aspects of the topic.
Conclusions
The results indicated that the Adventure While Fishing intervention was an effective approach to establishing basic knowledge about epilepsy within the targeted age group. In contrast, the Campi the Seahorse intervention would require further extension and/or modification to achieve sufficient effectiveness for this purpose.
目的目前的研究证实,足够高的癫痫知识对于减少癫痫患者的污名化和改善癫痫患者的生活质量至关重要。虽然针对年龄较大的儿童、青少年和成人的教育干预相对常见,但明显缺乏适合学龄前儿童的方法。我们之前的研究侧重于使用游戏和故事的教育干预,在此基础上,本研究旨在评估两种基于视频的干预措施的有效性,Campi the Seahorse和Adventure While Fishing,在5-6岁的儿童中,没有任何关于癫痫的知识。方法199名儿童参加两项干预研究。通过访谈对癫痫知识进行评估,采用在我们之前的干预研究中成功使用的11项测试,显示出令人满意的内部一致性和结构效度。在每次干预后和一个月后立即评估知识水平。此外,对干预的满意度及其对癫痫相关病耻感的潜在影响使用笑脸量表进行测量。结果与我们之前开发的使用教育故事的干预措施相比,冒险钓鱼干预措施显示出显著的效果。与之前没有接触过癫痫相关干预措施的9-11岁儿童所观察到的知识水平相比,其影响也很显著。相比之下,Campi the Seahorse干预的结果在所有比较中都明显较差,可能是由于其对主题关键方面的覆盖不足。结论“边钓鱼边冒险”干预是建立目标年龄组儿童癫痫基本知识的有效途径。相比之下,Campi the Seahorse修井作业需要进一步扩展和/或修改才能达到足够的效果。
期刊介绍:
Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy.
Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging.
From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.