Rethinking energy transition: Approaches from social representations theory

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.104001
Júlio J. Conde , Harumi Takano-Rojas
{"title":"Rethinking energy transition: Approaches from social representations theory","authors":"Júlio J. Conde ,&nbsp;Harumi Takano-Rojas","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy transition depends not only on technological and economic changes but is also deeply embedded in the complex social and cultural factors that shape it. However, existing reviews on energy perceptions often focus on psychological, economic, or policy-driven approaches, overlooking the symbolic and discursive dimensions shaping public understanding and engagement. To address this gap, this literature review examines the role of Social Representations Theory (SRT) in understanding societal perspectives on energy transition. Using content analysis, we synthesize and critically assess how SRT has been applied to examine the shared values, beliefs, and experiences that influence societal responses to energy policies and projects. Our findings highlight the theory's potential to uncover how different groups construct and negotiate meanings around energy transition. While SRT-based studies emphasize the importance of social acceptance, we identify a key limitation: an overemphasis on community acceptance of renewable energy without sufficiently questioning the broader socio-economic paradigms driving the energy transition. This review underscores the need for a holistic approach that integrates social, cultural, and political dimensions to address the complexities of energy transition, moving beyond a technological substitution perspective. By positioning SRT as a valuable framework for understanding the social aspects of energy transition, this study contributes to advancing interdisciplinary discussions and calls for further research incorporating diverse geographic and socio-political contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 104001"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000829","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy transition depends not only on technological and economic changes but is also deeply embedded in the complex social and cultural factors that shape it. However, existing reviews on energy perceptions often focus on psychological, economic, or policy-driven approaches, overlooking the symbolic and discursive dimensions shaping public understanding and engagement. To address this gap, this literature review examines the role of Social Representations Theory (SRT) in understanding societal perspectives on energy transition. Using content analysis, we synthesize and critically assess how SRT has been applied to examine the shared values, beliefs, and experiences that influence societal responses to energy policies and projects. Our findings highlight the theory's potential to uncover how different groups construct and negotiate meanings around energy transition. While SRT-based studies emphasize the importance of social acceptance, we identify a key limitation: an overemphasis on community acceptance of renewable energy without sufficiently questioning the broader socio-economic paradigms driving the energy transition. This review underscores the need for a holistic approach that integrates social, cultural, and political dimensions to address the complexities of energy transition, moving beyond a technological substitution perspective. By positioning SRT as a valuable framework for understanding the social aspects of energy transition, this study contributes to advancing interdisciplinary discussions and calls for further research incorporating diverse geographic and socio-political contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
[Association of the ABCG1 gene polymorphism with the susceptibility and severity of coronary atherosclerotic disease].
IF 0 中华医学遗传学杂志Pub Date : 2010-10-01 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9406.2010.05.007
Long Ma, Guang-hui Cheng, Hui Wang, Li Li, Yao-qin Gong, Qi-ji Liu
Association of IL28B and IL10 gene polymorphism with predisposition to tick-borne encephalitis in a Russian population
IF 3.2 2区 医学Ticks and Tick-borne DiseasesPub Date : 2016-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.03.019
Andrey V. Barkhash , Vladimir N. Babenko , Mikhail I. Voevoda , Aida G. Romaschenko
Association of rs1285933 single nucleotide polymorphism in CLEC5A gene with dengue severity and its functional effects
IF 2.7 4区 医学Human ImmunologyPub Date : 2017-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2017.07.013
Caroline Xavier-Carvalho , Renata Duarte da Silva Cezar , Naishe Matos Freire , Carla Maria Mola de Vasconcelos , Victor Edgar Fiestas Solorzano , Thiago Gomes de Toledo-Pinto , Luciana Gomes Fialho , Rodrigo Feliciano do Carmo , Luydson Richardson Silva Vasconcelos , Marli Tenório Cordeiro , Paulo Baptista , Elzinandes leal de Azeredo , Rivaldo Venâncio da Cunha , Luiz José de Souza , Antonio Guilherme Pacheco , Claire Fernandes Kubelka , Patrícia Muniz Mendes Freire de Moura , Milton Ozorio Moraes
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
The limitations of the one-stop-shop approach: How local experiences shaped opposition to the Norwegian wind power permitting system Knowledge is power? Information, partisan cleavages, and support for energy infrastructure Can citizen-financed photovoltaic projects support the energy transition? Experimental evidence from Swiss households Capturing the disruptive nature of green energy transitions: A political economy approach Integrating energy efficiency within housing systems: A systems approach to map retrofit decision-making among non-profit housing actors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1