The relative importance of soil moisture deficit, land use intensity and fertiliser spreading regulations for stream water quality in agricultural catchments

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124704
M. Fresne , P. Jordan , R. Cassidy
{"title":"The relative importance of soil moisture deficit, land use intensity and fertiliser spreading regulations for stream water quality in agricultural catchments","authors":"M. Fresne ,&nbsp;P. Jordan ,&nbsp;R. Cassidy","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite European-wide regulatory controls on fertiliser management that effectively close and open spreading periods, there are still ongoing stream water quality issues in agricultural catchments. Adjustments to these regulations largely relate to application rate and set-back distances from watercourses at the start of the open period to avoid sudden water quality impacts. Within this regulatory framework and using long-term datasets the aim of this study was to investigate the relative importance of Soil Moisture Deficit (SMD), land use intensity and fertiliser spreading regulation effects on stream water quality during the first weeks of the open spreading period. Fortnightly stream water samples were collected over 2009–2023 in twenty-four agricultural sub-catchments of major Northern Ireland rivers. Random Forest Regression models were developed to predict baseline stream water total phosphorus (TP), soluble reactive phosphorus and total oxidised nitrogen (TON) concentrations. SMD and land use intensity were the primary drivers of changes in phosphorus concentrations while land use intensity was the primary driver of changes in TON concentrations. SMD was a more important driver of changes in nutrient concentrations in the more intensively farmed sub-catchments. In the less intensive sub-catchments, land use intensity was at least 30% (for TP) to 85% (for TON) more important than SMD and fertiliser spreading regulation for explaining these changes. The study highlights the need to reduce the nutrient source pressure as a more effective step to improve water quality compared to small adjustments to fertiliser spreading protocols, and for policy reviews to account for changes in weather pressures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"377 ","pages":"Article 124704"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725006802","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite European-wide regulatory controls on fertiliser management that effectively close and open spreading periods, there are still ongoing stream water quality issues in agricultural catchments. Adjustments to these regulations largely relate to application rate and set-back distances from watercourses at the start of the open period to avoid sudden water quality impacts. Within this regulatory framework and using long-term datasets the aim of this study was to investigate the relative importance of Soil Moisture Deficit (SMD), land use intensity and fertiliser spreading regulation effects on stream water quality during the first weeks of the open spreading period. Fortnightly stream water samples were collected over 2009–2023 in twenty-four agricultural sub-catchments of major Northern Ireland rivers. Random Forest Regression models were developed to predict baseline stream water total phosphorus (TP), soluble reactive phosphorus and total oxidised nitrogen (TON) concentrations. SMD and land use intensity were the primary drivers of changes in phosphorus concentrations while land use intensity was the primary driver of changes in TON concentrations. SMD was a more important driver of changes in nutrient concentrations in the more intensively farmed sub-catchments. In the less intensive sub-catchments, land use intensity was at least 30% (for TP) to 85% (for TON) more important than SMD and fertiliser spreading regulation for explaining these changes. The study highlights the need to reduce the nutrient source pressure as a more effective step to improve water quality compared to small adjustments to fertiliser spreading protocols, and for policy reviews to account for changes in weather pressures.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Biochar price forecasting: A novel methodology for enhancing market stability and economic viability Satellite remote sensing of turbidity in Lake Xingkai using eight years of OLCI observations The relative importance of soil moisture deficit, land use intensity and fertiliser spreading regulations for stream water quality in agricultural catchments Utilization of red mud: Recovery of iron and aluminum by enhanced separation based on a new combined roasting process Water quality improves with increased spatially surface hydrological connectivity in plain river network areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1