Lidocaine administration techniques for head and limb wound anesthesia: Injection vs. topical application

Samad Shams Vahdati , Alireza Ala , Mohammad Mirza-aghazadeh attari , Paria Habibollahi , Arezoo Fathalizadeh , Behrang Khaffafi , Saba Mehrtabar
{"title":"Lidocaine administration techniques for head and limb wound anesthesia: Injection vs. topical application","authors":"Samad Shams Vahdati ,&nbsp;Alireza Ala ,&nbsp;Mohammad Mirza-aghazadeh attari ,&nbsp;Paria Habibollahi ,&nbsp;Arezoo Fathalizadeh ,&nbsp;Behrang Khaffafi ,&nbsp;Saba Mehrtabar","doi":"10.1016/j.pcorm.2025.100483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Lidocaine is one of the most utilized anesthetics used in different forms and various clinical contexts. Recently there have been controversy about the best method of lidocaine administration and there have been studies comparing subcutaneous and topical lidocaine in different clinical fields. The present study aims to compare the effect of topical and subcutaneous injection of lidocaine in patients presenting with ulcerations in their head and extremities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This single-center cross-sectional study, conducted from April 2016 to April 2017 at Imam Reza Medical Educational Center, Tabriz, Iran, included patients with extremity lacerations under 3 cm, excluding cases with bites, joint or ear injuries, specific medications, cardiac or neuropathic histories, and epilepsy. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained. Data were collected via questionnaires by trained interviewers. Patients received either topical or subcutaneous lidocaine as per clinical practice, without randomization. Pain was measured using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Data analysis utilized SPSS v22.0, with significance set at <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05 and 80 % study power.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In this observational study of 305 patients, 162 received subcutaneous lidocaine and 143 received topical lidocaine. No significant differences in age or gender were found (<em>P</em> = 0.25 and <em>P</em> = 0.86). Patients with topical lidocaine reported higher starting pain, while those receiving subcutaneous lidocaine experienced significantly more pain during administration and suturing (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), highlighting the impact of lidocaine application methods on patient pain experiences.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The difference in pain during administration between the two methods was statistically and clinically significant, while the difference in pain during suturing was statistically significant but not clinically meaningful. These findings suggest that topical lidocaine offers a less painful alternative to subcutaneous injection, particularly during administration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53468,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100483"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240560302500024X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Lidocaine is one of the most utilized anesthetics used in different forms and various clinical contexts. Recently there have been controversy about the best method of lidocaine administration and there have been studies comparing subcutaneous and topical lidocaine in different clinical fields. The present study aims to compare the effect of topical and subcutaneous injection of lidocaine in patients presenting with ulcerations in their head and extremities.

Methods

This single-center cross-sectional study, conducted from April 2016 to April 2017 at Imam Reza Medical Educational Center, Tabriz, Iran, included patients with extremity lacerations under 3 cm, excluding cases with bites, joint or ear injuries, specific medications, cardiac or neuropathic histories, and epilepsy. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained. Data were collected via questionnaires by trained interviewers. Patients received either topical or subcutaneous lidocaine as per clinical practice, without randomization. Pain was measured using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Data analysis utilized SPSS v22.0, with significance set at p < 0.05 and 80 % study power.

Results

In this observational study of 305 patients, 162 received subcutaneous lidocaine and 143 received topical lidocaine. No significant differences in age or gender were found (P = 0.25 and P = 0.86). Patients with topical lidocaine reported higher starting pain, while those receiving subcutaneous lidocaine experienced significantly more pain during administration and suturing (P < 0.05), highlighting the impact of lidocaine application methods on patient pain experiences.

Conclusion

The difference in pain during administration between the two methods was statistically and clinically significant, while the difference in pain during suturing was statistically significant but not clinically meaningful. These findings suggest that topical lidocaine offers a less painful alternative to subcutaneous injection, particularly during administration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The objective of this new online journal is to serve as a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed source of information related to the administrative, economic, operational, safety, and quality aspects of the ambulatory and in-patient operating room and interventional procedural processes. The journal will provide high-quality information and research findings on operational and system-based approaches to ensure safe, coordinated, and high-value periprocedural care. With the current focus on value in health care it is essential that there is a venue for researchers to publish articles on quality improvement process initiatives, process flow modeling, information management, efficient design, cost improvement, use of novel technologies, and management.
期刊最新文献
Lidocaine administration techniques for head and limb wound anesthesia: Injection vs. topical application Intraperitoneal installation of bupivacaine with either dexmedetomidine or ketamine for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A randomized controlled study Mapping the Flexible Endoscope Disinfection Cycle indicates the Need for Risk Reduction Strategies for Task Complexity and Environmental Stressors Effect of different doses of ephedrine on the incidence of second episode of hypo-tension during elective cesarean section under subarachnoid block: Time to event analysis; randomized clinical trial Assessment of the patients’ knowledge undergoing surgery about anesthesiology and anesthesiologists’ roles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1