Gerardo Castellanos-Osorio , Salam A. Abbas , Eugenio Molina-Navarro , Ryan T. Bailey , Javier Senent-Aparicio
{"title":"Assessing improvements in environmental flow estimation through the use of a coupled surface-groundwater model","authors":"Gerardo Castellanos-Osorio , Salam A. Abbas , Eugenio Molina-Navarro , Ryan T. Bailey , Javier Senent-Aparicio","doi":"10.1016/j.gsd.2025.101426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Environmental flow refers to the water required to maintain river ecosystems. Establishing methodologies to ensure these minimum flow rates is essential, particularly in highly anthropized regions, such as Spain. Hydrological models, including SWAT+, are used to simulate rivers in natural regime. However, accurately representing surface-groundwater interactions is crucial in groundwater-driven catchments, such as the Tagus River headwaters. Due to the standalone model limitations, we used the new coupled SWAT + <em>gwflow</em> model to appropriately represent surface-groundwater interactions in streamflow response. The calibration approaches of the (1) base SWAT+, and (2) SWAT + <em>gwflow</em> models focused on adjusting low flows, allowing for greater accuracy in daily flows to estimate environmental flows. In addition, (3) an experiment of monthly-to-daily disaggregation of the standalone model based on a daily flow pattern was conducted at two upstream stations. Our results indicated that the coupled model outperformed the standalone model across all statistical indicators, especially in low flows, where the Nash-Sutcliffe logarithm (LnNSE), an indicator of low flow performance, was inadequate for the standalone model because it underestimated of the simulated flows. This underestimation was also reflected in the environmental flow values, with variations ranging between −41% and −58% compared to the observed values. For the base model, a disaggregation experiment showed an improvement in environmental indicators, reducing their underestimation by half. Finally, the SWAT + <em>gwflow</em> model showed the best fit for environmental flows compared to observations, with average variations of ±10% in most cases, showing improvement in daily low flows due to a better representation of surface-groundwater interactions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37879,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater for Sustainable Development","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101426"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Groundwater for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352801X25000232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Environmental flow refers to the water required to maintain river ecosystems. Establishing methodologies to ensure these minimum flow rates is essential, particularly in highly anthropized regions, such as Spain. Hydrological models, including SWAT+, are used to simulate rivers in natural regime. However, accurately representing surface-groundwater interactions is crucial in groundwater-driven catchments, such as the Tagus River headwaters. Due to the standalone model limitations, we used the new coupled SWAT + gwflow model to appropriately represent surface-groundwater interactions in streamflow response. The calibration approaches of the (1) base SWAT+, and (2) SWAT + gwflow models focused on adjusting low flows, allowing for greater accuracy in daily flows to estimate environmental flows. In addition, (3) an experiment of monthly-to-daily disaggregation of the standalone model based on a daily flow pattern was conducted at two upstream stations. Our results indicated that the coupled model outperformed the standalone model across all statistical indicators, especially in low flows, where the Nash-Sutcliffe logarithm (LnNSE), an indicator of low flow performance, was inadequate for the standalone model because it underestimated of the simulated flows. This underestimation was also reflected in the environmental flow values, with variations ranging between −41% and −58% compared to the observed values. For the base model, a disaggregation experiment showed an improvement in environmental indicators, reducing their underestimation by half. Finally, the SWAT + gwflow model showed the best fit for environmental flows compared to observations, with average variations of ±10% in most cases, showing improvement in daily low flows due to a better representation of surface-groundwater interactions.
期刊介绍:
Groundwater for Sustainable Development is directed to different stakeholders and professionals, including government and non-governmental organizations, international funding agencies, universities, public water institutions, public health and other public/private sector professionals, and other relevant institutions. It is aimed at professionals, academics and students in the fields of disciplines such as: groundwater and its connection to surface hydrology and environment, soil sciences, engineering, ecology, microbiology, atmospheric sciences, analytical chemistry, hydro-engineering, water technology, environmental ethics, economics, public health, policy, as well as social sciences, legal disciplines, or any other area connected with water issues. The objectives of this journal are to facilitate: • The improvement of effective and sustainable management of water resources across the globe. • The improvement of human access to groundwater resources in adequate quantity and good quality. • The meeting of the increasing demand for drinking and irrigation water needed for food security to contribute to a social and economically sound human development. • The creation of a global inter- and multidisciplinary platform and forum to improve our understanding of groundwater resources and to advocate their effective and sustainable management and protection against contamination. • Interdisciplinary information exchange and to stimulate scientific research in the fields of groundwater related sciences and social and health sciences required to achieve the United Nations Millennium Development Goals for sustainable development.