Assessing improvements in environmental flow estimation through the use of a coupled surface-groundwater model

IF 4.9 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Groundwater for Sustainable Development Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.gsd.2025.101426
Gerardo Castellanos-Osorio , Salam A. Abbas , Eugenio Molina-Navarro , Ryan T. Bailey , Javier Senent-Aparicio
{"title":"Assessing improvements in environmental flow estimation through the use of a coupled surface-groundwater model","authors":"Gerardo Castellanos-Osorio ,&nbsp;Salam A. Abbas ,&nbsp;Eugenio Molina-Navarro ,&nbsp;Ryan T. Bailey ,&nbsp;Javier Senent-Aparicio","doi":"10.1016/j.gsd.2025.101426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Environmental flow refers to the water required to maintain river ecosystems. Establishing methodologies to ensure these minimum flow rates is essential, particularly in highly anthropized regions, such as Spain. Hydrological models, including SWAT+, are used to simulate rivers in natural regime. However, accurately representing surface-groundwater interactions is crucial in groundwater-driven catchments, such as the Tagus River headwaters. Due to the standalone model limitations, we used the new coupled SWAT + <em>gwflow</em> model to appropriately represent surface-groundwater interactions in streamflow response. The calibration approaches of the (1) base SWAT+, and (2) SWAT + <em>gwflow</em> models focused on adjusting low flows, allowing for greater accuracy in daily flows to estimate environmental flows. In addition, (3) an experiment of monthly-to-daily disaggregation of the standalone model based on a daily flow pattern was conducted at two upstream stations. Our results indicated that the coupled model outperformed the standalone model across all statistical indicators, especially in low flows, where the Nash-Sutcliffe logarithm (LnNSE), an indicator of low flow performance, was inadequate for the standalone model because it underestimated of the simulated flows. This underestimation was also reflected in the environmental flow values, with variations ranging between −41% and −58% compared to the observed values. For the base model, a disaggregation experiment showed an improvement in environmental indicators, reducing their underestimation by half. Finally, the SWAT + <em>gwflow</em> model showed the best fit for environmental flows compared to observations, with average variations of ±10% in most cases, showing improvement in daily low flows due to a better representation of surface-groundwater interactions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37879,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater for Sustainable Development","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101426"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Groundwater for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352801X25000232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental flow refers to the water required to maintain river ecosystems. Establishing methodologies to ensure these minimum flow rates is essential, particularly in highly anthropized regions, such as Spain. Hydrological models, including SWAT+, are used to simulate rivers in natural regime. However, accurately representing surface-groundwater interactions is crucial in groundwater-driven catchments, such as the Tagus River headwaters. Due to the standalone model limitations, we used the new coupled SWAT + gwflow model to appropriately represent surface-groundwater interactions in streamflow response. The calibration approaches of the (1) base SWAT+, and (2) SWAT + gwflow models focused on adjusting low flows, allowing for greater accuracy in daily flows to estimate environmental flows. In addition, (3) an experiment of monthly-to-daily disaggregation of the standalone model based on a daily flow pattern was conducted at two upstream stations. Our results indicated that the coupled model outperformed the standalone model across all statistical indicators, especially in low flows, where the Nash-Sutcliffe logarithm (LnNSE), an indicator of low flow performance, was inadequate for the standalone model because it underestimated of the simulated flows. This underestimation was also reflected in the environmental flow values, with variations ranging between −41% and −58% compared to the observed values. For the base model, a disaggregation experiment showed an improvement in environmental indicators, reducing their underestimation by half. Finally, the SWAT + gwflow model showed the best fit for environmental flows compared to observations, with average variations of ±10% in most cases, showing improvement in daily low flows due to a better representation of surface-groundwater interactions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Groundwater for Sustainable Development
Groundwater for Sustainable Development Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
10.20%
发文量
152
期刊介绍: Groundwater for Sustainable Development is directed to different stakeholders and professionals, including government and non-governmental organizations, international funding agencies, universities, public water institutions, public health and other public/private sector professionals, and other relevant institutions. It is aimed at professionals, academics and students in the fields of disciplines such as: groundwater and its connection to surface hydrology and environment, soil sciences, engineering, ecology, microbiology, atmospheric sciences, analytical chemistry, hydro-engineering, water technology, environmental ethics, economics, public health, policy, as well as social sciences, legal disciplines, or any other area connected with water issues. The objectives of this journal are to facilitate: • The improvement of effective and sustainable management of water resources across the globe. • The improvement of human access to groundwater resources in adequate quantity and good quality. • The meeting of the increasing demand for drinking and irrigation water needed for food security to contribute to a social and economically sound human development. • The creation of a global inter- and multidisciplinary platform and forum to improve our understanding of groundwater resources and to advocate their effective and sustainable management and protection against contamination. • Interdisciplinary information exchange and to stimulate scientific research in the fields of groundwater related sciences and social and health sciences required to achieve the United Nations Millennium Development Goals for sustainable development.
期刊最新文献
Unveiling groundwater gems: A GIS-powered fusion of AHP and TOPSIS for mapping groundwater potential zones Radon concentration in water sources and its associated cancer risks to the populace of Ede, South Western Nigeria Risk assessment of not meeting environmental objectives related to protection of human health and groundwater quality: The tiered approach in the context of the EU water framework directive Assessing groundwater quality and solute sources in highly anthropized areas. The case of Abuja Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria Assessing improvements in environmental flow estimation through the use of a coupled surface-groundwater model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1