Assessing sustainable latent heat energy storage of RT 35 phase change material in double pipe heat exchangers: A study on concentric and hairpin designs

IF 5.4 Sustainable Chemistry for Climate Action Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.scca.2025.100058
Pallavi Kumari, Vinamr Saksena, Rishabh Jha, Debasree Ghosh
{"title":"Assessing sustainable latent heat energy storage of RT 35 phase change material in double pipe heat exchangers: A study on concentric and hairpin designs","authors":"Pallavi Kumari,&nbsp;Vinamr Saksena,&nbsp;Rishabh Jha,&nbsp;Debasree Ghosh","doi":"10.1016/j.scca.2025.100058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To reduce the reliance on conventional fuels and mitigate environmental degradation, phase change materials (PCMs) offer a promising alternative. This study compares the performance of melting and solidification processes in hairpin and concentric heat exchangers (HEXs), with the goal of designing effective latent heat energy storage systems for both domestic and industrial applications. The research highlights that the time required for melting and solidification depends on several factors, including the thermal diffusivity and viscosity of the PCM. Although the energy contained in both concentric and hairpin heat exchangers is equal due to the same quantity of PCM used, the time required for energy storage is shorter in the hairpin heat exchanger (HHEX) (146 min) compared to the concentric heat exchanger (CHEX) (207 min). Additionally, the study underscores the significance of selecting the appropriate PCM, noting that PCMs with higher latent heat values has more energy storage capacity. However, the efficiency of energy storage also based on the variation in temperature between the high-temperature fluid (HTF) and the starting temperature of the PCM. The study finds that the energy storage capacity of the hairpin heat exchanger (HHEX) is 1.8 times greater than that of the concentric heat exchanger (CHEX) when using RT 35 as the PCM.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101195,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Chemistry for Climate Action","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100058"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Chemistry for Climate Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772826925000033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To reduce the reliance on conventional fuels and mitigate environmental degradation, phase change materials (PCMs) offer a promising alternative. This study compares the performance of melting and solidification processes in hairpin and concentric heat exchangers (HEXs), with the goal of designing effective latent heat energy storage systems for both domestic and industrial applications. The research highlights that the time required for melting and solidification depends on several factors, including the thermal diffusivity and viscosity of the PCM. Although the energy contained in both concentric and hairpin heat exchangers is equal due to the same quantity of PCM used, the time required for energy storage is shorter in the hairpin heat exchanger (HHEX) (146 min) compared to the concentric heat exchanger (CHEX) (207 min). Additionally, the study underscores the significance of selecting the appropriate PCM, noting that PCMs with higher latent heat values has more energy storage capacity. However, the efficiency of energy storage also based on the variation in temperature between the high-temperature fluid (HTF) and the starting temperature of the PCM. The study finds that the energy storage capacity of the hairpin heat exchanger (HHEX) is 1.8 times greater than that of the concentric heat exchanger (CHEX) when using RT 35 as the PCM.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
rt35相变材料在双管换热器中的可持续潜热蓄能评价:同心和发夹设计的研究
为了减少对传统燃料的依赖并缓解环境恶化,相变材料(PCMs)提供了一个很有前途的替代方案。本研究比较了发夹式换热器和同心式换热器(HEXs)的熔化和凝固过程的性能,目的是设计出适用于家用和工业应用的有效潜热储能系统。研究强调,熔化和凝固所需的时间取决于几个因素,包括PCM的热扩散率和粘度。虽然由于使用的PCM数量相同,同心式换热器和发夹式换热器所含的能量是相等的,但发夹式换热器(HHEX)(146分钟)所需的能量储存时间比同心式换热器(CHEX)(207分钟)短。此外,研究还强调了选择合适的PCM的重要性,指出潜热值较高的PCM具有更大的储能能力。然而,储能效率也取决于高温流体(HTF)与PCM启动温度之间的温度变化。研究发现,采用RT - 35作为PCM时,发夹式换热器(HHEX)的储能容量是同心式换热器(CHEX)的1.8倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhanced air pollution control: covalent-organic framework filters for capturing toxic mesitylene gases Recent advances in the synthesis of manganese oxide nanoparticles and comparative evaluation of their biological activities Cocoa waste recovery for starch-based biocomposites: Outdoor exposure assessment approach Microbial necromass as the central architect of soil carbon: Reconciling plant inputs, microbial processing, and mineral stabilization in a critical synthesis Thermodynamics of oxazolidinone derivatives formation and amine regeneration during CO₂ capture: N-methylethanolamine vs ethanolamine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1