Sensitivity to Sea Ice Thickness Parameters in a Coupled Ice-Ocean Data Assimilation System

IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1029/2024MS004276
Carmen Nab, Davi Mignac, Jack Landy, Matthew Martin, Julienne Stroeve, Michel Tsamados
{"title":"Sensitivity to Sea Ice Thickness Parameters in a Coupled Ice-Ocean Data Assimilation System","authors":"Carmen Nab,&nbsp;Davi Mignac,&nbsp;Jack Landy,&nbsp;Matthew Martin,&nbsp;Julienne Stroeve,&nbsp;Michel Tsamados","doi":"10.1029/2024MS004276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sea ice thickness (SIT) estimates derived from CryoSat-2 radar freeboard measurements are assimilated into the Met Office's Forecast Ocean Assimilation Model. We test the sensitivity of winter simulations to the snow depth, radar freeboard product and assumed radar penetration through the snowpack in the freeboard-to-thickness conversion. We find that modifying the snow depth has the biggest impact on the modeled SIT, changing it by up to 0.88 m (48%), compared to 0.65 m (33%) when modifying the assumed radar penetration through the snowpack and 0.55 m (30%) when modifying the freeboard product. We find a doubling in the thermodynamic volume change over the winter season when assimilating SIT data, with the largest changes seen in the congelation ice growth. Next, we determine that the method used to calculate the observation uncertainties of the assimilated data products can change the mean daily model SIT by up to 36%. Compared to measurements collected at upward-looking sonar moorings and during the Operation IceBridge campaign, we find an improvement in the SIT simulations' variability representation when assuming partial radar penetration through the snowpack and when improving the method used to calculate the CryoSat-2 observation uncertainties. This paper highlights a concern for future SIT data assimilation and forecasting, with the chosen parameterization of the freeboard-to-thickness conversion having a substantial impact on model results.</p>","PeriodicalId":14881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024MS004276","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024MS004276","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sea ice thickness (SIT) estimates derived from CryoSat-2 radar freeboard measurements are assimilated into the Met Office's Forecast Ocean Assimilation Model. We test the sensitivity of winter simulations to the snow depth, radar freeboard product and assumed radar penetration through the snowpack in the freeboard-to-thickness conversion. We find that modifying the snow depth has the biggest impact on the modeled SIT, changing it by up to 0.88 m (48%), compared to 0.65 m (33%) when modifying the assumed radar penetration through the snowpack and 0.55 m (30%) when modifying the freeboard product. We find a doubling in the thermodynamic volume change over the winter season when assimilating SIT data, with the largest changes seen in the congelation ice growth. Next, we determine that the method used to calculate the observation uncertainties of the assimilated data products can change the mean daily model SIT by up to 36%. Compared to measurements collected at upward-looking sonar moorings and during the Operation IceBridge campaign, we find an improvement in the SIT simulations' variability representation when assuming partial radar penetration through the snowpack and when improving the method used to calculate the CryoSat-2 observation uncertainties. This paper highlights a concern for future SIT data assimilation and forecasting, with the chosen parameterization of the freeboard-to-thickness conversion having a substantial impact on model results.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
241
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (JAMES) is committed to advancing the science of Earth systems modeling by offering high-quality scientific research through online availability and open access licensing. JAMES invites authors and readers from the international Earth systems modeling community. Open access. Articles are available free of charge for everyone with Internet access to view and download. Formal peer review. Supplemental material, such as code samples, images, and visualizations, is published at no additional charge. No additional charge for color figures. Modest page charges to cover production costs. Articles published in high-quality full text PDF, HTML, and XML. Internal and external reference linking, DOI registration, and forward linking via CrossRef.
期刊最新文献
Sensitivity to Sea Ice Thickness Parameters in a Coupled Ice-Ocean Data Assimilation System Toward Transparency and Consistency: An Open-Source Optics Parameterization for Clouds and Precipitation Diagnosing Nonlocal Vertical Acceleration in Moist Convection Using a Large-Eddy Simulation Characterizing How Meteorological Forcing Selection and Parameter Uncertainty Influence Community Land Model Version 5 Hydrological Applications in the United States Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1