Scale for Measuring Critical Thinking Ability for Dental Residents: A Development and Validation Study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of evaluation in clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1111/jep.70031
Lina Dai, Tingting Wu, Yun Hu, Jinlin Song
{"title":"Scale for Measuring Critical Thinking Ability for Dental Residents: A Development and Validation Study","authors":"Lina Dai,&nbsp;Tingting Wu,&nbsp;Yun Hu,&nbsp;Jinlin Song","doi":"10.1111/jep.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To establish and validate a short scale of critical thinking ability for dental residents based on the Byrnes theory.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Two hundred and thirty-four dental residents in total from Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were divided into development group and validation group randomly. In the development phase, the content validation and the initial reduction was underwent by the modified Delphi method. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability test was used to validate the scale in the evaluation phase.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We developed a 21 items scale after two rounds of expert consultation via Delphi method. In the evaluation phase, no significant sociodemographic difference was found among the 234 participants. Fifteen items extracted three factors and CFA results indicated acceptable goodness-of-fit indices of this scale. The scale was with a good internal consistency and reliability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This version of critical thinking scale for the Chinese dental residents was considered to be more feasible for application in the clinical practice and dental education.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To establish and validate a short scale of critical thinking ability for dental residents based on the Byrnes theory.

Materials and Methods

Two hundred and thirty-four dental residents in total from Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were divided into development group and validation group randomly. In the development phase, the content validation and the initial reduction was underwent by the modified Delphi method. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability test was used to validate the scale in the evaluation phase.

Results

We developed a 21 items scale after two rounds of expert consultation via Delphi method. In the evaluation phase, no significant sociodemographic difference was found among the 234 participants. Fifteen items extracted three factors and CFA results indicated acceptable goodness-of-fit indices of this scale. The scale was with a good internal consistency and reliability.

Conclusions

This version of critical thinking scale for the Chinese dental residents was considered to be more feasible for application in the clinical practice and dental education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙科住院医师批判性思维能力量表之开发与验证研究
目的建立并验证基于Byrnes理论的牙科住院医师批判性思维能力短量表。材料与方法将重庆医科大学口腔医院牙科住院医师234人随机分为发展组和验证组。在开发阶段,采用改进的德尔菲法进行了含量验证和初步还原。在评价阶段采用探索性因子分析(EFA)、验证性因子分析(CFA)和信度检验对量表进行验证。结果经两轮专家咨询,采用德尔菲法编制了21项量表。在评估阶段,在234名参与者中没有发现显著的社会人口统计学差异。15个项目提取了3个因素,CFA结果表明该量表的拟合优度指数可接受。量表具有良好的内部一致性和信度。结论该版本的批判性思维量表在我国牙科住院医师的临床实践和口腔教育中应用更为可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Verbal Feedback in Medical Education: Utilization of a Feedback Model to Develop a Standardized Rubric for Evaluation. Determining Awareness of Age-Related Changes in Individuals Aged 40 and Over Applying to Family Health Centres in Türkiye. Beyond Anxiety: Rethinking the Psychological Drivers of Nurses' Readiness for Medical Artificial Intelligence. Navigating Marital Dynamics in Pakistan: The Interplay of Interpersonal Patterns and Sociocultural Influences. Only Economic Solutions Will Enable the Implementation of Genetic Sequencing in the Real World.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1