Scale for Measuring Critical Thinking Ability for Dental Residents: A Development and Validation Study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of evaluation in clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1111/jep.70031
Lina Dai, Tingting Wu, Yun Hu, Jinlin Song
{"title":"Scale for Measuring Critical Thinking Ability for Dental Residents: A Development and Validation Study","authors":"Lina Dai,&nbsp;Tingting Wu,&nbsp;Yun Hu,&nbsp;Jinlin Song","doi":"10.1111/jep.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To establish and validate a short scale of critical thinking ability for dental residents based on the Byrnes theory.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Two hundred and thirty-four dental residents in total from Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were divided into development group and validation group randomly. In the development phase, the content validation and the initial reduction was underwent by the modified Delphi method. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability test was used to validate the scale in the evaluation phase.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We developed a 21 items scale after two rounds of expert consultation via Delphi method. In the evaluation phase, no significant sociodemographic difference was found among the 234 participants. Fifteen items extracted three factors and CFA results indicated acceptable goodness-of-fit indices of this scale. The scale was with a good internal consistency and reliability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This version of critical thinking scale for the Chinese dental residents was considered to be more feasible for application in the clinical practice and dental education.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To establish and validate a short scale of critical thinking ability for dental residents based on the Byrnes theory.

Materials and Methods

Two hundred and thirty-four dental residents in total from Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were divided into development group and validation group randomly. In the development phase, the content validation and the initial reduction was underwent by the modified Delphi method. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability test was used to validate the scale in the evaluation phase.

Results

We developed a 21 items scale after two rounds of expert consultation via Delphi method. In the evaluation phase, no significant sociodemographic difference was found among the 234 participants. Fifteen items extracted three factors and CFA results indicated acceptable goodness-of-fit indices of this scale. The scale was with a good internal consistency and reliability.

Conclusions

This version of critical thinking scale for the Chinese dental residents was considered to be more feasible for application in the clinical practice and dental education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
期刊最新文献
Systematic Review of Outcome Measures in Pharmacologically Managed Chronic Pain: Informing a New Outcome Framework for Healthcare Provider-Led Pharmacotherapy Services Investigation of the Effectiveness of a Biopsychosocial-Based Exercise Approach in Rheumatic Diseases: A Mixed Methods Research With Patients' Perspectives Issue Information FungiCAP Survey: Insights Into Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices in Antifungal Prescriptions in Colombia Scale for Measuring Critical Thinking Ability for Dental Residents: A Development and Validation Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1