Analysis of phylogroups, biofilm formation, virulence factors, antibiotic resistance and molecular typing of uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from patients with recurrent and non-recurrent urinary tract infections.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES BMC Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1186/s12879-025-10635-w
Parisa Mahshouri, Mohammad Yousef Alikhani, Hossein Emad Momtaz, Amin Doosti-Irani, Leili Shokoohizadeh
{"title":"Analysis of phylogroups, biofilm formation, virulence factors, antibiotic resistance and molecular typing of uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from patients with recurrent and non-recurrent urinary tract infections.","authors":"Parisa Mahshouri, Mohammad Yousef Alikhani, Hossein Emad Momtaz, Amin Doosti-Irani, Leili Shokoohizadeh","doi":"10.1186/s12879-025-10635-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is the predominant cause of urinary tract infections (UTIs), and the recurrence of these infections poses significant treatment challenges.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the phylogroups, biofilm formation, virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance of UPEC strains in patients with recurrent versus non-recurrent UTIs in Hamadan City, Western Iran.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 110 E. coli isolates were collected from urine cultures across three major hospitals and laboratories. The isolates were confirmed through biochemical tests, and their antibiotic resistance profiles were evaluated using the disk diffusion method. Biofilm production was assessed using the microtiter plate method, while virulence genes and phylogroup determination were analyzed via PCR. Real-time PCR was employed to compare the expression levels of the pap and fimH virulence genes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicated that 73% of isolates were from non-recurrent UTI patients, with a higher incidence in females and children under 10 years. A significant difference was detected in the underlying diseases and the expression of the pap between the recurrent and non-recurrent groups. Antibiotic resistance was notably significant, particularly against Ampicillin-sulbactam, Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole, Nalidixic acid, and Ciprofloxacin, with 77% of strains classified as multi-drug resistant (MDR). Despite differences in the rates of ESBL production between recurrent (53%) and non-recurrent (42.5%) strains, no significant differences were observed in antibiotic resistance, biofilm formation, virulence factors, or phylogroups between the two groups. Phylogenetic analysis revealed a predominance of phylogroups B2 and D, with high genetic diversity among the isolates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights the traits of UPEC strains in recurrent and non-recurrent UTIs, showing high antibiotic resistance and genetic diversity among isolates. The study found notable differences in underlying diseases and the expression of the pap gene between recurrent and non-recurrent groups, suggesting that these factors may play a crucial role in the recurrence of infections. Further investigation into these differences could enhance our understanding and management of recurrent UTIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8981,"journal":{"name":"BMC Infectious Diseases","volume":"25 1","pages":"267"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11853791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-10635-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is the predominant cause of urinary tract infections (UTIs), and the recurrence of these infections poses significant treatment challenges.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the phylogroups, biofilm formation, virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance of UPEC strains in patients with recurrent versus non-recurrent UTIs in Hamadan City, Western Iran.

Materials and methods: A total of 110 E. coli isolates were collected from urine cultures across three major hospitals and laboratories. The isolates were confirmed through biochemical tests, and their antibiotic resistance profiles were evaluated using the disk diffusion method. Biofilm production was assessed using the microtiter plate method, while virulence genes and phylogroup determination were analyzed via PCR. Real-time PCR was employed to compare the expression levels of the pap and fimH virulence genes.

Results: The results indicated that 73% of isolates were from non-recurrent UTI patients, with a higher incidence in females and children under 10 years. A significant difference was detected in the underlying diseases and the expression of the pap between the recurrent and non-recurrent groups. Antibiotic resistance was notably significant, particularly against Ampicillin-sulbactam, Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole, Nalidixic acid, and Ciprofloxacin, with 77% of strains classified as multi-drug resistant (MDR). Despite differences in the rates of ESBL production between recurrent (53%) and non-recurrent (42.5%) strains, no significant differences were observed in antibiotic resistance, biofilm formation, virulence factors, or phylogroups between the two groups. Phylogenetic analysis revealed a predominance of phylogroups B2 and D, with high genetic diversity among the isolates.

Conclusion: The study highlights the traits of UPEC strains in recurrent and non-recurrent UTIs, showing high antibiotic resistance and genetic diversity among isolates. The study found notable differences in underlying diseases and the expression of the pap gene between recurrent and non-recurrent groups, suggesting that these factors may play a crucial role in the recurrence of infections. Further investigation into these differences could enhance our understanding and management of recurrent UTIs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尿路复发性和非复发性尿路感染患者尿路致病性大肠杆菌的系统群、生物膜形成、毒力因子、抗生素耐药性和分子分型分析
背景:尿路致病性大肠杆菌(UPEC)是尿路感染(uti)的主要原因,这些感染的复发给治疗带来了重大挑战。目的:本研究旨在比较伊朗西部哈马丹市复发性和非复发性尿路感染患者UPEC菌株的系统群、生物膜形成、毒力因子和抗生素耐药性。材料和方法:从三家主要医院和实验室的尿液培养中收集了110株大肠杆菌。通过生化试验对分离菌株进行鉴定,并采用纸片扩散法对其耐药谱进行评价。采用微滴板法评估生物膜产量,通过PCR分析毒力基因和系统群测定。采用Real-time PCR方法比较pap和fimH毒力基因的表达水平。结果:73%的分离株来自非复发性尿路感染患者,其中女性和10岁以下儿童发病率较高。复发组和非复发组的基础疾病和pap的表达有显著差异。抗生素耐药性显著,特别是对氨苄西林-舒巴坦、甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑、萘啶酸和环丙沙星的耐药性,77%的菌株被列为多重耐药(MDR)。尽管复发菌株(53%)和非复发菌株(42.5%)之间的ESBL产生率存在差异,但在抗生素耐药性、生物膜形成、毒力因子或系统群方面,两组之间没有显著差异。系统进化分析显示,该菌株以B2和D系统群为主,具有较高的遗传多样性。结论:该研究突出了UPEC菌株在复发性和非复发性uti中的特点,显示出较高的抗生素耐药性和菌株间的遗传多样性。研究发现复发组和非复发组在基础疾病和pap基因表达方面存在显著差异,提示这些因素可能在感染复发中起关键作用。进一步研究这些差异可以提高我们对复发性尿路感染的认识和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Infectious Diseases
BMC Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
860
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Infectious Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of infectious and sexually transmitted diseases in humans, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity in Mongolian adults with and without chronic hepatitis. Clinical characteristics and mortality of critically ill patients with chikungunya infection: a multicenter study in Paraguay. Robinsoniella peoriensis bacteremia in a patient with colorectal cancer: a case report and literature review. Analysis of rpoB mutations associated with rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Malawi. Integration of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and Lactate for diagnostic and early risk stratification in pediatric sepsis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1