{"title":"Transvaginal Cervical Screening in Individuals with Previous Late Preterm Birth.","authors":"Diana Aboukhater, Amira Elzarea, Shaida Campbell, Wave Hatton, Tracey DeYoung, Jerri Waller, Tetsuya Kawakita","doi":"10.1055/a-2526-5492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of ultrasound cervical length (CL) screening in reducing preterm births among individuals with various preterm birth histories, aiming to optimize prevention strategies.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> This retrospective cohort study included 576 pregnant individuals with singleton pregnancies and a history of preterm birth, who underwent transvaginal ultrasound CL screening between January 2014 and December 2020. The primary outcome was the detection of a short cervix (≤2.5 cm). We compared outcomes among individuals with a previous gestational age (GA) of 34 to 36, 28 to 33, 24 to 27, and <24 weeks. Adjusted relative risks (aRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using modified Poisson's regression with robust variance, controlling for predefined confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Of 576 (35%), 139 (24.1%) had a previous birth at 34 to 36 weeks, 129 (22.4%) had a previous birth at 28 to 33 weeks, 90 (15.6%) had a previous birth at 24 to 27 weeks, and 218 (37.8%) had a previous birth <24 weeks. Compared with individuals with a previous GA 34 to 36 weeks, the risk of short cervix was higher in those with a previous <24 weeks (21.6 vs. 52.8%, aRR = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.81-3.62) and GA 24 to 27 weeks (40.0%, aRR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.20-2.71), but no difference was found with those with previous GA 28 to 33 weeks (24.8%, aRR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.72-1.72). Compared with individuals with previous GA 28 to 33 weeks, individuals with prior GA 34 to 36 weeks had the same risk of cerclage placement and preterm birth <34 weeks, but a lower risk of composite neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Based on our results of similar incidence of the short cervix between individuals with previous GA 34 to 36 weeks and those with previous GA 28 to 33 weeks, individuals with a history of late preterm birth should receive CL screening in a similar manner.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Similar short cervix for prior 34 to 36 versus 28 to 33 weeks.. · Lower risk of neonatal outcomes in the prior 34 to 36 weeks of birth.. · Screening is warranted for any prior preterm birth..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2526-5492","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of ultrasound cervical length (CL) screening in reducing preterm births among individuals with various preterm birth histories, aiming to optimize prevention strategies.
Study design: This retrospective cohort study included 576 pregnant individuals with singleton pregnancies and a history of preterm birth, who underwent transvaginal ultrasound CL screening between January 2014 and December 2020. The primary outcome was the detection of a short cervix (≤2.5 cm). We compared outcomes among individuals with a previous gestational age (GA) of 34 to 36, 28 to 33, 24 to 27, and <24 weeks. Adjusted relative risks (aRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using modified Poisson's regression with robust variance, controlling for predefined confounders.
Results: Of 576 (35%), 139 (24.1%) had a previous birth at 34 to 36 weeks, 129 (22.4%) had a previous birth at 28 to 33 weeks, 90 (15.6%) had a previous birth at 24 to 27 weeks, and 218 (37.8%) had a previous birth <24 weeks. Compared with individuals with a previous GA 34 to 36 weeks, the risk of short cervix was higher in those with a previous <24 weeks (21.6 vs. 52.8%, aRR = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.81-3.62) and GA 24 to 27 weeks (40.0%, aRR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.20-2.71), but no difference was found with those with previous GA 28 to 33 weeks (24.8%, aRR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.72-1.72). Compared with individuals with previous GA 28 to 33 weeks, individuals with prior GA 34 to 36 weeks had the same risk of cerclage placement and preterm birth <34 weeks, but a lower risk of composite neonatal outcomes.
Conclusion: Based on our results of similar incidence of the short cervix between individuals with previous GA 34 to 36 weeks and those with previous GA 28 to 33 weeks, individuals with a history of late preterm birth should receive CL screening in a similar manner.
Key points: · Similar short cervix for prior 34 to 36 versus 28 to 33 weeks.. · Lower risk of neonatal outcomes in the prior 34 to 36 weeks of birth.. · Screening is warranted for any prior preterm birth..
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields.
The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field.
All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication.
The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.