Patient-Reported Outcome (PROMIS) Scores Improve After Gender-Affirming Mastectomy.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004240
Keith R Sweitzer, David Milek, Joseph M Escandón, Derrick Sanderson, Jose G Christiano
{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcome (PROMIS) Scores Improve After Gender-Affirming Mastectomy.","authors":"Keith R Sweitzer, David Milek, Joseph M Escandón, Derrick Sanderson, Jose G Christiano","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ad hoc and patient-reported outcome measures not specific to transgender surgery limit assessment of the impact of gender-affirming procedures. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was developed as an objective and validated instrument to measure patient-related outcomes. In our study, we aimed to describe and analyze mean T-score changes in PROMIS before and after gender-affirming mastectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-institution retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was conducted on patients undergoing gender-affirming mastectomy (GAM) between October 2016 and July 2023. Along with demographic data, PROMIS T-scores for different health domains related to gender dysphoria were collected preoperatively and at postoperative months 1, 3, and 6. Tukey-Kramer adjustment statistical analysis and linear mixed-effect model were employed to accommodate both fixed and random effects from nonindependence in the data with adjusted P < 0.05 being considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 185 patients were included. The average age was 23.7 years. Seven percent of patients were identified as nonbinary; 91% received preoperative hormonal therapy. Furthermore, 87.7% completed the survey on postoperative month 1 (POM1), 68.3% on POM3, and 47.5% on POM6. Baseline anxiety was found significantly worse (T-score, 60.4) compared to general US population. Satisfaction with social roles, anxiety, depression, social isolation, and anger demonstrated significantly improved T-scores after GAM on POM1, 3, and 6 compared to preoperative values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Female-to-male transgender patients undergoing GAM demonstrated lasting improvements in satisfaction with social roles, anxiety, depression, social isolation, and anger over the period of 6 months postoperatively. PROMIS represents a relevant and useful tool to measure patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing gender-affirming surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"94 3","pages":"281-285"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004240","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ad hoc and patient-reported outcome measures not specific to transgender surgery limit assessment of the impact of gender-affirming procedures. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was developed as an objective and validated instrument to measure patient-related outcomes. In our study, we aimed to describe and analyze mean T-score changes in PROMIS before and after gender-affirming mastectomy.

Methods: A single-institution retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was conducted on patients undergoing gender-affirming mastectomy (GAM) between October 2016 and July 2023. Along with demographic data, PROMIS T-scores for different health domains related to gender dysphoria were collected preoperatively and at postoperative months 1, 3, and 6. Tukey-Kramer adjustment statistical analysis and linear mixed-effect model were employed to accommodate both fixed and random effects from nonindependence in the data with adjusted P < 0.05 being considered statistically significant.

Results: A total of 185 patients were included. The average age was 23.7 years. Seven percent of patients were identified as nonbinary; 91% received preoperative hormonal therapy. Furthermore, 87.7% completed the survey on postoperative month 1 (POM1), 68.3% on POM3, and 47.5% on POM6. Baseline anxiety was found significantly worse (T-score, 60.4) compared to general US population. Satisfaction with social roles, anxiety, depression, social isolation, and anger demonstrated significantly improved T-scores after GAM on POM1, 3, and 6 compared to preoperative values.

Conclusions: Female-to-male transgender patients undergoing GAM demonstrated lasting improvements in satisfaction with social roles, anxiety, depression, social isolation, and anger over the period of 6 months postoperatively. PROMIS represents a relevant and useful tool to measure patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing gender-affirming surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别确认乳房切除术后患者报告预后(PROMIS)评分改善。
背景:非特定于跨性别手术的特设和患者报告的结果测量限制了对性别确认手术影响的评估。患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)是一种客观有效的测量患者相关结果的工具。在我们的研究中,我们旨在描述和分析在性别确认乳房切除术前后PROMIS的平均t评分变化。方法:对2016年10月至2023年7月期间接受性别确认乳房切除术(GAM)的患者进行前瞻性数据库的单机构回顾性分析。与人口统计数据一起,在术前和术后1、3和6个月收集与性别不安相关的不同健康领域的PROMIS t评分。采用Tukey-Kramer调整统计分析和线性混合效应模型来适应数据中不独立的固定效应和随机效应,以调整后的P < 0.05为具有统计学意义。结果:共纳入185例患者。平均年龄为23.7岁。7%的患者被认定为非二元;91%的患者术前接受激素治疗。此外,87.7%的患者在术后1个月(POM1)完成调查,68.3%的患者在POM3完成调查,47.5%的患者在POM6完成调查。与普通美国人群相比,基线焦虑明显更差(t评分,60.4)。与术前相比,GAM后对社会角色、焦虑、抑郁、社会孤立和愤怒的满意度显著提高了POM1、3和6的t评分。结论:接受GAM治疗的女变男变性患者在社会角色满意度、焦虑、抑郁、社会孤立和愤怒等方面表现出持续改善。PROMIS是一种相关且有用的工具,用于衡量接受性别确认手术的患者报告的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Analysis of Viability, Regeneration, and Functional Contributions of Cryopreserved Adipose-Derived Components: An Experimental Study. Radial Nerve Palsy Compression Injury at Spiral Groove From Self-myofascial Release: A Case Report and a Literature Review. Nipple-Preserving Skin-Reducing Mastectomy in Ptotic Breasts: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Preserving Function in Sternal Reconstruction: Complementary Roles of Pectoralis Major and Internal Mammary Artery Perforator Flaps. Increasing Utilization and Cost of Open Access Publishing in Plastic Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1