Sensitivity of intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring for scoliosis correction in identifying postoperative neurological deficits: a retrospective chart review of the Scoliosis Research Society morbidity and mortality database.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1186/s12891-024-08115-4
Kenney Ki Lee Lau, Kenny Yat Hong Kwan, Jason Pui Yin Cheung
{"title":"Sensitivity of intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring for scoliosis correction in identifying postoperative neurological deficits: a retrospective chart review of the Scoliosis Research Society morbidity and mortality database.","authors":"Kenney Ki Lee Lau, Kenny Yat Hong Kwan, Jason Pui Yin Cheung","doi":"10.1186/s12891-024-08115-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical intervention is the ultimate treatment for scoliosis, but iatrogenic spinal cord injury is one of the major concerns. Although intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring can aid in detecting and reducing postoperative neurological complications, its use is still controversial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of 6,577 scoliotic patients who underwent surgery for curve correction with a reported complication was conducted. Our dataset was sourced from the morbidity and mortality database of the Scoliosis Research Society spanning the period from 2013 to 2023. The sensitivity of intraoperative monitoring was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative monitoring was used in 60% of surgeries, while 26% of the reported complications in the study cohort were new postoperative neurologic deficits. The overall monitoring performance indicated a sensitivity of 45%. Neurogenic motor evoked potential showed the best outcomes among the individual monitoring methods. The highest sensitivity (60.4%) was achieved using four monitoring methods, demonstrating significantly better results than one, two, and three methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The monitoring practice benefits in distinguishing postoperative neurologic deficits within the scoliosis population. Employing four monitoring techniques yielded the most favourable outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11849389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08115-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical intervention is the ultimate treatment for scoliosis, but iatrogenic spinal cord injury is one of the major concerns. Although intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring can aid in detecting and reducing postoperative neurological complications, its use is still controversial.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of 6,577 scoliotic patients who underwent surgery for curve correction with a reported complication was conducted. Our dataset was sourced from the morbidity and mortality database of the Scoliosis Research Society spanning the period from 2013 to 2023. The sensitivity of intraoperative monitoring was evaluated.

Results: Intraoperative monitoring was used in 60% of surgeries, while 26% of the reported complications in the study cohort were new postoperative neurologic deficits. The overall monitoring performance indicated a sensitivity of 45%. Neurogenic motor evoked potential showed the best outcomes among the individual monitoring methods. The highest sensitivity (60.4%) was achieved using four monitoring methods, demonstrating significantly better results than one, two, and three methods.

Conclusions: The monitoring practice benefits in distinguishing postoperative neurologic deficits within the scoliosis population. Employing four monitoring techniques yielded the most favourable outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术中电生理监测对脊柱侧凸矫正识别术后神经功能缺损的敏感性:脊柱侧凸研究协会发病率和死亡率数据库的回顾性图表综述。
背景:手术干预是脊柱侧凸的最终治疗方法,但医源性脊髓损伤是主要问题之一。尽管术中电生理监测有助于发现和减少术后神经系统并发症,但其应用仍存在争议。方法:回顾性分析6,577例脊柱侧凸患者的资料,这些患者接受了矫正弯曲的手术,并报告了并发症。我们的数据来源于脊柱侧凸研究协会的发病率和死亡率数据库,时间跨度为2013年至2023年。评价术中监测的敏感性。结果:术中监测在60%的手术中使用,而26%的研究队列中报告的并发症是术后新的神经功能缺损。总体监测性能表明灵敏度为45%。神经源性运动诱发电位在各监测方法中效果最好。4种监测方法灵敏度最高(60.4%),明显优于1、2、3种监测方法。结论:监测实践有助于识别脊柱侧凸患者术后神经功能缺损。采用四种监测技术产生了最有利的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of short-term costs and 3-year complications in geriatric femoral neck fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty. SuperLearner approach for predicting imminent risk of fracture in older Chinese patients with newly diagnosed osteoporosis based on their routine blood test markers. Proximal fibulectomy in the management of proximal fibular aneurysmal bone cyst: technical considerations and outcome; a retrospective case series. A CT-Based scoring system for predicting degenerative posterosuperior rotator cuff tears: a risk stratification tool for patients with contraindications to MRI. Multimodal prehabilitation for frail older adults having hip or knee replacement: a qualitative exploratory study of barriers and facilitators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1