Dying in residential care homes during the early COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY BMC Geriatrics Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1186/s12877-025-05779-y
Nancy Preston, Zoë Cockshott, Siân Russell, Rachel Stocker, Jo Knight, Suzanne Mason, Barbara Hanratty
{"title":"Dying in residential care homes during the early COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study.","authors":"Nancy Preston, Zoë Cockshott, Siân Russell, Rachel Stocker, Jo Knight, Suzanne Mason, Barbara Hanratty","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-05779-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, care homes (long-term care facilities) globally were severely impacted in many ways, including end-of-life care and death of residents. They experienced significantly elevated mortality rates amongst residents, compounded by restrictions on support from external healthcare and specialist palliative care providers. Family access to dying residents was often severely restricted. This paper explores experiences of deaths, dying and end-of-life care in care homes during the first year of the pandemic (Spring 2020-2021).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a wider study of experiences in care homes in Northern England during the early pandemic, we conducted semi-structured interviews with care home staff (16), residents (3), family members (5) and health service staff (10). Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, this secondary analysis focusing on experiences of death and dying over the period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thematic analysis generated three key themes: (1) Preparing for large scale deaths: Care home staff reported a sense of foreboding at requirements to prepare for large scale resident deaths, sometimes feeling left with minimal external support to manage this, and uneasy about the rapid roll-out of emergency care planning to residents; (2) Balancing support and policing visiting during the terminal phase: The requirement to restrict access for family members when their relatives were dying was experienced as distressing for both family members and care home staff; and, (3) Distress surrounding deaths for staff and families: Care home staff were distressed by the frequency and speed of deaths that they witnessed when their care home had a COVID-19 outbreak. Family separation near time of death was a source of distress for everyone involved, with suggestions that this led to regrets in bereavement for family members, and moral distress in staff.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The experience of death and dying in care homes in the early waves of the COVID-19 pandemic was extremely challenging for care home staff and family members. Our analysis suggests that the ramifications of stringent visitation policies and the consequent distress may shape experiences in bereavement. Monitoring for longer term consequences, such as prolonged grief and moral injury, should be a priority.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"126"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854402/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05779-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, care homes (long-term care facilities) globally were severely impacted in many ways, including end-of-life care and death of residents. They experienced significantly elevated mortality rates amongst residents, compounded by restrictions on support from external healthcare and specialist palliative care providers. Family access to dying residents was often severely restricted. This paper explores experiences of deaths, dying and end-of-life care in care homes during the first year of the pandemic (Spring 2020-2021).

Methods: As part of a wider study of experiences in care homes in Northern England during the early pandemic, we conducted semi-structured interviews with care home staff (16), residents (3), family members (5) and health service staff (10). Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, this secondary analysis focusing on experiences of death and dying over the period.

Results: Thematic analysis generated three key themes: (1) Preparing for large scale deaths: Care home staff reported a sense of foreboding at requirements to prepare for large scale resident deaths, sometimes feeling left with minimal external support to manage this, and uneasy about the rapid roll-out of emergency care planning to residents; (2) Balancing support and policing visiting during the terminal phase: The requirement to restrict access for family members when their relatives were dying was experienced as distressing for both family members and care home staff; and, (3) Distress surrounding deaths for staff and families: Care home staff were distressed by the frequency and speed of deaths that they witnessed when their care home had a COVID-19 outbreak. Family separation near time of death was a source of distress for everyone involved, with suggestions that this led to regrets in bereavement for family members, and moral distress in staff.

Conclusions: The experience of death and dying in care homes in the early waves of the COVID-19 pandemic was extremely challenging for care home staff and family members. Our analysis suggests that the ramifications of stringent visitation policies and the consequent distress may shape experiences in bereavement. Monitoring for longer term consequences, such as prolonged grief and moral injury, should be a priority.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行早期在寄宿护理院死亡:一项定性访谈研究
背景:在COVID-19大流行早期,全球养老院(长期护理机构)在许多方面受到严重影响,包括临终关怀和居民死亡。他们经历了居民死亡率的显著上升,加上外部医疗保健和专业姑息治疗提供者的支持受到限制。临终病人的家属接触往往受到严格限制。本文探讨了大流行第一年(2020年春季-2021年春季)在养老院中死亡、临终和临终关怀的经历。方法:作为大流行早期英格兰北部护理院经验更广泛研究的一部分,我们对护理院工作人员(16人)、居民(3人)、家庭成员(5人)和卫生服务人员(10人)进行了半结构化访谈。使用反身性专题分析对访谈进行了分析,这种次要分析侧重于这一时期的死亡和临终经历。结果:专题分析产生了三个关键主题:(1)为大规模死亡做准备:养老院工作人员报告说,他们对为大规模居民死亡做准备的要求有一种不祥的预感,有时感到没有多少外部支持来管理这一点,并对向居民快速推出紧急护理计划感到不安;(2)在临终阶段平衡支持和监管探视:亲属临终时限制家属探视的要求对家属和护理院工作人员都是痛苦的;(3)工作人员和家属因死亡而感到痛苦:当他们所在的养老院爆发COVID-19疫情时,他们目睹的死亡频率和速度令养老院工作人员感到痛苦。临近死亡时的家庭分离对所有相关人员来说都是痛苦的根源,有人认为这导致了家庭成员对丧亲之痛的遗憾,以及工作人员的道德痛苦。结论:在COVID-19大流行的早期浪潮中,养老院的死亡和临终经历对养老院工作人员和家庭成员来说极具挑战性。我们的分析表明,严格的探视政策和随之而来的痛苦可能会影响丧亲经历。监测长期的后果,如长期的悲伤和道德伤害,应该是一个优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
期刊最新文献
Incidence and predictors of postoperative cognitive dysfunction among elderly elective surgical patients at selected governmental hospitals in Southern Ethiopia, 2023 GC: a multicenter prospective single arm cohort study. The relationship between sleep quality and blood pressure in older adults with hypertension. Barriers and facilitators to rehabilitation exercise adherence in older adults with hip fractures: a mixed-methods systematic review. Development and validation of an oral frailty assessment tool for older adults based on the COSMIN risk of bias checklist: a cross-sectional study. Government interventions and elderly health: a mixed-methods health impact assessment of a rural welfare program.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1