Influence of stem length on sagittal alignment in total hip arthroplasty: a comparison between short and standard stems.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1186/s12891-025-08445-x
Musashi Ima, Tamon Kabata, Daisuke Inoue, Yuu Yanagi, Takahiro Iyobe, Satoru Demura
{"title":"Influence of stem length on sagittal alignment in total hip arthroplasty: a comparison between short and standard stems.","authors":"Musashi Ima, Tamon Kabata, Daisuke Inoue, Yuu Yanagi, Takahiro Iyobe, Satoru Demura","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08445-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total hip arthroplasty (THA), a critical surgery for hip joint pain relief and mobility restoration, involves careful consideration of various factors, including stem length. Short stems are often chosen for their potential to reduce tissue damage and thigh pain. Precise alignment is necessary to alleviate complications such as stem loosening and fractures. We aimed to compare intramedullary insertion freedom and alignment changes between short and standard stems in THA. This study is based on preoperative planning simulations, highlighting the potential clinical implications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study involved 102 hip joints (34 each from Dorr A, B, and C) undergoing initial THA between 2015 and 2017. A preoperative computed tomography scan was used to create three-dimensional bone models for planning virtual surgery, assessing stem insertion in flexion/extension, and measuring the anterior femoral offset. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was conducted to compare intramedullary insertion freedom and anterior femoral offset across the three Dorr classifications (A, B, and C). A paired t-test was used to compare intramedullary insertion freedom and anterior femoral offset between short and standard stems for each Dorr classification and between different medullary shapes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant differences were observed between the stem types (p < 0.05). Short stems demonstrated significantly greater intramedullary insertion freedom, with averages of 7.5°, 8.2°, and 9.1° for Dorr A, B, and C, respectively, compared with 4.3°, 5.0°, and 5.8° for standard stems. Additionally, the anterior femoral offset was significantly higher in short stems, with an average increase of 2.5 mm across classifications, compared to 1.2 mm in standard stems (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Short stems offer enhanced intramedullary insertion freedom and improved anterior femoral offset, potentially leading to better alignment outcomes in THA. However, their increased freedom necessitates precise surgical planning, particularly in patients with wider medullary morphologies. These findings emphasize the importance of simulation-based planning in understanding the impact of stem length, while clinical studies are needed to validate these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"188"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11852553/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08445-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA), a critical surgery for hip joint pain relief and mobility restoration, involves careful consideration of various factors, including stem length. Short stems are often chosen for their potential to reduce tissue damage and thigh pain. Precise alignment is necessary to alleviate complications such as stem loosening and fractures. We aimed to compare intramedullary insertion freedom and alignment changes between short and standard stems in THA. This study is based on preoperative planning simulations, highlighting the potential clinical implications.

Methods: This retrospective study involved 102 hip joints (34 each from Dorr A, B, and C) undergoing initial THA between 2015 and 2017. A preoperative computed tomography scan was used to create three-dimensional bone models for planning virtual surgery, assessing stem insertion in flexion/extension, and measuring the anterior femoral offset. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was conducted to compare intramedullary insertion freedom and anterior femoral offset across the three Dorr classifications (A, B, and C). A paired t-test was used to compare intramedullary insertion freedom and anterior femoral offset between short and standard stems for each Dorr classification and between different medullary shapes.

Results: Statistically significant differences were observed between the stem types (p < 0.05). Short stems demonstrated significantly greater intramedullary insertion freedom, with averages of 7.5°, 8.2°, and 9.1° for Dorr A, B, and C, respectively, compared with 4.3°, 5.0°, and 5.8° for standard stems. Additionally, the anterior femoral offset was significantly higher in short stems, with an average increase of 2.5 mm across classifications, compared to 1.2 mm in standard stems (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Short stems offer enhanced intramedullary insertion freedom and improved anterior femoral offset, potentially leading to better alignment outcomes in THA. However, their increased freedom necessitates precise surgical planning, particularly in patients with wider medullary morphologies. These findings emphasize the importance of simulation-based planning in understanding the impact of stem length, while clinical studies are needed to validate these results.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全髋关节置换术中短柄和标准柄长度对矢状位对齐的影响。
背景:全髋关节置换术(THA)是缓解髋关节疼痛和恢复活动能力的关键手术,需要仔细考虑各种因素,包括髋关节柄长度。通常选择短茎,因为它们有减少组织损伤和大腿疼痛的潜力。精确对准是必要的,以减轻并发症,如阀杆松动和骨折。我们的目的是比较THA中短柄和标准柄的髓内插入自由度和对中变化。本研究基于术前计划模拟,强调了潜在的临床意义。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2015年至2017年期间接受首次髋关节置换术的102个髋关节(A、B、C区各34个)。术前计算机断层扫描用于创建三维骨模型,以规划虚拟手术,评估屈伸时的干插入,并测量股前偏移。采用单向重复测量方差分析比较三种Dorr分类(A、B和C)的髓内插入自由度和股前偏移。采用配对t检验比较每种Dorr分类的短柄和标准柄之间以及不同髓形状之间的髓内插入自由度和股前偏移。结果:在不同类型的柄之间观察到统计学上的显著差异(p)。结论:短柄提供了增强的髓内插入自由度和改善的股前偏移,可能导致THA中更好的对准结果。然而,其自由度的增加需要精确的手术计划,特别是在髓质形态较宽的患者中。这些发现强调了基于模拟的计划在理解茎长影响方面的重要性,但需要临床研究来验证这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
期刊最新文献
Management of older adults consulting in GP surgery practices with back pain in UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum: population based study. Foot plantar pressure characteristics during standing and gait in adolescents with moderate double-curve adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (Lenke type 3 and type 6): a case-control study. Virtual 3D landmark palpation in clubfoot: feasibility of an innovative standardized morphometric protocol. A preliminary study. Development, validation, and biomechanical evaluation of a high-fidelity finite element model of the forearm musculoskeletal system​. High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: a comprehensive meta-analysis with patient-specific stratification by age, BMI, and preoperative activity levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1