Influence of stem length on sagittal alignment in total hip arthroplasty: a comparison between short and standard stems.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1186/s12891-025-08445-x
Musashi Ima, Tamon Kabata, Daisuke Inoue, Yuu Yanagi, Takahiro Iyobe, Satoru Demura
{"title":"Influence of stem length on sagittal alignment in total hip arthroplasty: a comparison between short and standard stems.","authors":"Musashi Ima, Tamon Kabata, Daisuke Inoue, Yuu Yanagi, Takahiro Iyobe, Satoru Demura","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08445-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total hip arthroplasty (THA), a critical surgery for hip joint pain relief and mobility restoration, involves careful consideration of various factors, including stem length. Short stems are often chosen for their potential to reduce tissue damage and thigh pain. Precise alignment is necessary to alleviate complications such as stem loosening and fractures. We aimed to compare intramedullary insertion freedom and alignment changes between short and standard stems in THA. This study is based on preoperative planning simulations, highlighting the potential clinical implications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study involved 102 hip joints (34 each from Dorr A, B, and C) undergoing initial THA between 2015 and 2017. A preoperative computed tomography scan was used to create three-dimensional bone models for planning virtual surgery, assessing stem insertion in flexion/extension, and measuring the anterior femoral offset. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was conducted to compare intramedullary insertion freedom and anterior femoral offset across the three Dorr classifications (A, B, and C). A paired t-test was used to compare intramedullary insertion freedom and anterior femoral offset between short and standard stems for each Dorr classification and between different medullary shapes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant differences were observed between the stem types (p < 0.05). Short stems demonstrated significantly greater intramedullary insertion freedom, with averages of 7.5°, 8.2°, and 9.1° for Dorr A, B, and C, respectively, compared with 4.3°, 5.0°, and 5.8° for standard stems. Additionally, the anterior femoral offset was significantly higher in short stems, with an average increase of 2.5 mm across classifications, compared to 1.2 mm in standard stems (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Short stems offer enhanced intramedullary insertion freedom and improved anterior femoral offset, potentially leading to better alignment outcomes in THA. However, their increased freedom necessitates precise surgical planning, particularly in patients with wider medullary morphologies. These findings emphasize the importance of simulation-based planning in understanding the impact of stem length, while clinical studies are needed to validate these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"188"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11852553/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08445-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA), a critical surgery for hip joint pain relief and mobility restoration, involves careful consideration of various factors, including stem length. Short stems are often chosen for their potential to reduce tissue damage and thigh pain. Precise alignment is necessary to alleviate complications such as stem loosening and fractures. We aimed to compare intramedullary insertion freedom and alignment changes between short and standard stems in THA. This study is based on preoperative planning simulations, highlighting the potential clinical implications.

Methods: This retrospective study involved 102 hip joints (34 each from Dorr A, B, and C) undergoing initial THA between 2015 and 2017. A preoperative computed tomography scan was used to create three-dimensional bone models for planning virtual surgery, assessing stem insertion in flexion/extension, and measuring the anterior femoral offset. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was conducted to compare intramedullary insertion freedom and anterior femoral offset across the three Dorr classifications (A, B, and C). A paired t-test was used to compare intramedullary insertion freedom and anterior femoral offset between short and standard stems for each Dorr classification and between different medullary shapes.

Results: Statistically significant differences were observed between the stem types (p < 0.05). Short stems demonstrated significantly greater intramedullary insertion freedom, with averages of 7.5°, 8.2°, and 9.1° for Dorr A, B, and C, respectively, compared with 4.3°, 5.0°, and 5.8° for standard stems. Additionally, the anterior femoral offset was significantly higher in short stems, with an average increase of 2.5 mm across classifications, compared to 1.2 mm in standard stems (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Short stems offer enhanced intramedullary insertion freedom and improved anterior femoral offset, potentially leading to better alignment outcomes in THA. However, their increased freedom necessitates precise surgical planning, particularly in patients with wider medullary morphologies. These findings emphasize the importance of simulation-based planning in understanding the impact of stem length, while clinical studies are needed to validate these results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
期刊最新文献
Arthroscopic Bankart repair using trans-glenoid double-loaded grand knots versus double-loaded suture anchors; is there a difference? a randomized controlled study. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of patellar lateral retraction and patellar eversion in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The prevalence and surgical outcome of late diagnosed hip dysplasia in children with Prader-Willi syndrome: a retrospective study. Muscle loading and endochondral ossification are involved in the regeneration of a fibrocartilaginous enthesis during tendon to bone healing in rabbits. An update on improvement and innovation in the management of adult thoracolumbar spinal deformity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1