Comparison Between Signal Transduction Pathway Activity in Blood Cells of Sepsis Patients and Laboratory Models.

IF 5.2 2区 生物学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY Cells Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.3390/cells14040311
Wilbert Bouwman, Reinier Raymakers, Tom van der Poll, Anja van de Stolpe
{"title":"Comparison Between Signal Transduction Pathway Activity in Blood Cells of Sepsis Patients and Laboratory Models.","authors":"Wilbert Bouwman, Reinier Raymakers, Tom van der Poll, Anja van de Stolpe","doi":"10.3390/cells14040311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sepsis represents a serious disease burden that lacks effective treatment. Drug development for sepsis requires laboratory models that adequately represent sepsis patients. Simultaneous Transcriptome-based Activity Profiling of Signal Transduction Pathway (STAP-STP) technology quantitatively infers STP activity from mRNA levels of target genes of the STP-associated transcription factor. Here, we used STAP-STP technology to compare STP activities between sepsis patients and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-based models. Activity scores of Androgen Receptor (AR), TGFβ, NFκB, JAK-STAT1/2, and JAK-STAT3 STPs were calculated based on publicly available transcriptome data. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with Gram-negative sepsis, nor PBMCs stimulated with LPS in vitro, showed altered STP activity. Increased NFκB, JAK-STAT1/2, and JAK-STAT3 STP activity was found in whole blood stimulated with LPS in vitro, and in whole blood obtained after intravenous injection of LPS in humans in vivo; AR and TGFβ STP activity only increased in the in vivo LPS model. These results resembled previously reported STP activity in whole blood of sepsis patients. We provide the first comparison of STP activity between patients with sepsis and laboratory model systems. Results are of use for the refinement of sepsis model systems for rational drug development.</p>","PeriodicalId":9743,"journal":{"name":"Cells","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cells","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14040311","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sepsis represents a serious disease burden that lacks effective treatment. Drug development for sepsis requires laboratory models that adequately represent sepsis patients. Simultaneous Transcriptome-based Activity Profiling of Signal Transduction Pathway (STAP-STP) technology quantitatively infers STP activity from mRNA levels of target genes of the STP-associated transcription factor. Here, we used STAP-STP technology to compare STP activities between sepsis patients and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-based models. Activity scores of Androgen Receptor (AR), TGFβ, NFκB, JAK-STAT1/2, and JAK-STAT3 STPs were calculated based on publicly available transcriptome data. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with Gram-negative sepsis, nor PBMCs stimulated with LPS in vitro, showed altered STP activity. Increased NFκB, JAK-STAT1/2, and JAK-STAT3 STP activity was found in whole blood stimulated with LPS in vitro, and in whole blood obtained after intravenous injection of LPS in humans in vivo; AR and TGFβ STP activity only increased in the in vivo LPS model. These results resembled previously reported STP activity in whole blood of sepsis patients. We provide the first comparison of STP activity between patients with sepsis and laboratory model systems. Results are of use for the refinement of sepsis model systems for rational drug development.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脓毒症患者血细胞信号转导通路活性与实验室模型的比较
败血症是一种缺乏有效治疗的严重疾病负担。脓毒症的药物开发需要能够充分代表脓毒症患者的实验室模型。基于同步转录组的信号转导通路活性分析(STP- STP)技术从STP相关转录因子靶基因的mRNA水平定量推断STP活性。在这里,我们使用STP -STP技术来比较脓毒症患者和基于脂多糖(LPS)的模型之间的STP活性。根据公开的转录组数据计算雄激素受体(AR)、TGFβ、NFκB、JAK-STAT1/2和JAK-STAT3 stp的活性评分。革兰氏阴性脓毒症患者的外周血单核细胞(PBMCs),以及体外LPS刺激的PBMCs,显示出STP活性的改变。体外LPS刺激的全血和体内静脉注射LPS后的全血中发现NFκB、JAK-STAT1/2和JAK-STAT3 STP活性升高;AR和TGFβ STP活性仅在体内LPS模型中升高。这些结果与先前报道的脓毒症患者全血中STP活性相似。我们提供了脓毒症患者和实验室模型系统之间STP活性的首次比较。研究结果可用于改进脓毒症模型系统,以便合理开发药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cells
Cells Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
3472
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: Cells (ISSN 2073-4409) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to cell biology, molecular biology and biophysics. It publishes reviews, research articles, communications and technical notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided.
期刊最新文献
ER Proteotoxic Stress Drives Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Heat-Stressed Intestinal Epithelial Cells. A Novel In Vitro Vascularized Dermis Organotypic Model of Acute and Chronic-Like Wounds. Clinical Characterization of Atypical Diabetes: Insights from the GENEPEDIAB Study into the Spectrum Between Type 1 and Monogenic Diabetes. TBK1 Mutations in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Dementia: Mechanistic Insights into Impaired Autophagy and Proteostatic Failure. TGF-β Signaling as a Pathological Continuum Linking Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Lung Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1