Diagnostic Yield and Synergistic Impact of Needle Aspiration and Forceps Biopsy with Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions (CONFIDENT-ENB): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Chest Pub Date : 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.015
Yeon Wook Kim, Hyung-Jun Kim, Byoung Soo Kwon, Ye Jin Lee, Myung Jin Song, Sung Hyun Yoon, Sung Yoon Lim, Yeon Joo Lee, Jong Sun Park, Young-Jae Cho, Kyung Hee Lee, Jin-Haeng Chung, Yeon Bi Han, Fabien Maldonado, So Yeon Ahn, Youngmi Park, Dong-Hyun Joo, Jae Ho Lee, Choon-Taek Lee
{"title":"Diagnostic Yield and Synergistic Impact of Needle Aspiration and Forceps Biopsy with Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions (CONFIDENT-ENB): A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Yeon Wook Kim, Hyung-Jun Kim, Byoung Soo Kwon, Ye Jin Lee, Myung Jin Song, Sung Hyun Yoon, Sung Yoon Lim, Yeon Joo Lee, Jong Sun Park, Young-Jae Cho, Kyung Hee Lee, Jin-Haeng Chung, Yeon Bi Han, Fabien Maldonado, So Yeon Ahn, Youngmi Park, Dong-Hyun Joo, Jae Ho Lee, Choon-Taek Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) is an advanced imaging-guided technique used to diagnose peripheral pulmonary lesions. However, the optimal strategy for selecting biopsy devices remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Does the combination of needle aspiration and forceps biopsy improve diagnostic yield compared with that using a single device alone?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized crossover study during ENB performed under moderate sedation. This trial recruited participants with peripheral pulmonary lesions requiring biopsy who were eligible for elective ENB. ENB-guided needle aspiration and forceps biopsy were sequentially performed in a randomized order. The primary outcome was diagnostic yield, defined as the percentage of patients for whom the biopsy provided a specific diagnosis able to inform patient management. The diagnostic yield achieved by each biopsy modality individually and in combination was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between December 1, 2021, and November 13, 2023, 142 participants were enrolled and underwent the study procedures. Complete follow-up data were obtained for 140 participants. Diagnostic yield was 44.4% (63/142) for forceps biopsy, 51.4% (73/142) for needle aspiration (p=0.221 vs. forceps), and 66.9% (95/142) for the combination (p<0.001 vs. forceps alone, p<0.001 vs. needle alone). Sensitivities for malignancy were 58.3% (70/120) for needle aspiration and 47.5% (57/120) for forceps biopsy (p=0.074). The combination of the two modalities resulted in a significantly improved sensitivity of 71.7% (86/120) compared with either individual modality (p<0.001 vs. forceps alone and needle alone). Pneumothorax occurred in 3.5% (5/142) of patients, and 1.4% (2/142) developed pneumothorax requiring tube drainage.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>When performing ENB under moderate sedation, the combination of needle aspiration and forceps biopsy significantly improves the diagnostic yield and sensitivity for malignancy compared to each modality alone, with a favorable safety profile. These results indicate that a multimodal approach using needles and forceps is a valid diagnostic strategy for ENB.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT05110131.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) is an advanced imaging-guided technique used to diagnose peripheral pulmonary lesions. However, the optimal strategy for selecting biopsy devices remains unclear.

Research question: Does the combination of needle aspiration and forceps biopsy improve diagnostic yield compared with that using a single device alone?

Study design and methods: We conducted a randomized crossover study during ENB performed under moderate sedation. This trial recruited participants with peripheral pulmonary lesions requiring biopsy who were eligible for elective ENB. ENB-guided needle aspiration and forceps biopsy were sequentially performed in a randomized order. The primary outcome was diagnostic yield, defined as the percentage of patients for whom the biopsy provided a specific diagnosis able to inform patient management. The diagnostic yield achieved by each biopsy modality individually and in combination was evaluated.

Results: Between December 1, 2021, and November 13, 2023, 142 participants were enrolled and underwent the study procedures. Complete follow-up data were obtained for 140 participants. Diagnostic yield was 44.4% (63/142) for forceps biopsy, 51.4% (73/142) for needle aspiration (p=0.221 vs. forceps), and 66.9% (95/142) for the combination (p<0.001 vs. forceps alone, p<0.001 vs. needle alone). Sensitivities for malignancy were 58.3% (70/120) for needle aspiration and 47.5% (57/120) for forceps biopsy (p=0.074). The combination of the two modalities resulted in a significantly improved sensitivity of 71.7% (86/120) compared with either individual modality (p<0.001 vs. forceps alone and needle alone). Pneumothorax occurred in 3.5% (5/142) of patients, and 1.4% (2/142) developed pneumothorax requiring tube drainage.

Interpretation: When performing ENB under moderate sedation, the combination of needle aspiration and forceps biopsy significantly improves the diagnostic yield and sensitivity for malignancy compared to each modality alone, with a favorable safety profile. These results indicate that a multimodal approach using needles and forceps is a valid diagnostic strategy for ENB.

Clinical trial registration: NCT05110131.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic Yield and Synergistic Impact of Needle Aspiration and Forceps Biopsy with Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions (CONFIDENT-ENB): A Randomized Controlled Trial. Estimating the Causal Effect of Double-Blind Peer Review for a Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine Journal. Growing Up with Developmental Lung Diseases: A Review for the Adult Pulmonologist. Prognostic Value of Main Pulmonary Artery Diameter in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Impact of non-invasive ventilation before and after cardiac surgery for preventing cardiac and pulmonary complications: a clinical randomized trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1