{"title":"Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Newly Diagnosed and Pre-Existing Diabetes Mellitus Patients after Acute Coronary Syndrome.","authors":"Wei-Chieh Lee, Huang-Chung Chen, Chih-Yuan Fang, Yi-Hsuan Tsai, Yun-Yu Hsieh, Tien-Yu Chen, Yen-Nan Fang, Po-Jui Wu, Hsiu-Yu Fang, Ping-Yen Liu","doi":"10.2174/0115701611322555250219111038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes, including recurrent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and mortality, in ACS patients with varying HbA1c levels, addressing the controversy over optimal targets in those with newly diagnosed and pre-existing diabetes mellitus (DM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2005 to December 2019, a total of 33,990 patients were identified with ACS in the Chang Gung Research Database based on their medical history. After excluding patients without DM and baseline or subsequent HbA1C data, a cohort of 11,870 DM patients was divided into two groups: one consisting of 6,089 patients with newly diagnosed DM and the other comprising 5,781 patients with pre-existing DM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the three-year follow-up, the pre-existing DM group experienced worse clinical outcomes, such as increased rates of re-ACS, major bleeding, cardiovascular (CV) events, and all-cause mortality. Optimal HbA1c levels for mitigating re-ACS and/or CV mortality and all-cause mortality appeared to differ between the two DM cohorts. Re-ACS and CV mortality reached their highest at an HbA1c of 6.8% for all DM patients, 6.6% for newly diagnosed, and 6.7% for pre-existing cases. The greatest all-cause mortality risk was at an HbA1c of 7.4% for all DM patients, 7.0% in newly diagnosed, and 8.2% in pre-existing patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Upon comparing newly diagnosed DM patients with those with pre-existing DM, a poorer prognosis was observed in the latter group, attributed to older age and a higher burden of comorbidities. Throughout the follow-up period, maintaining consistently low HbA1c levels did not reduce the incidence of re-ACS nor enhance survival rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":11278,"journal":{"name":"Current vascular pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current vascular pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115701611322555250219111038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes, including recurrent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and mortality, in ACS patients with varying HbA1c levels, addressing the controversy over optimal targets in those with newly diagnosed and pre-existing diabetes mellitus (DM).
Methods: From January 2005 to December 2019, a total of 33,990 patients were identified with ACS in the Chang Gung Research Database based on their medical history. After excluding patients without DM and baseline or subsequent HbA1C data, a cohort of 11,870 DM patients was divided into two groups: one consisting of 6,089 patients with newly diagnosed DM and the other comprising 5,781 patients with pre-existing DM.
Results: During the three-year follow-up, the pre-existing DM group experienced worse clinical outcomes, such as increased rates of re-ACS, major bleeding, cardiovascular (CV) events, and all-cause mortality. Optimal HbA1c levels for mitigating re-ACS and/or CV mortality and all-cause mortality appeared to differ between the two DM cohorts. Re-ACS and CV mortality reached their highest at an HbA1c of 6.8% for all DM patients, 6.6% for newly diagnosed, and 6.7% for pre-existing cases. The greatest all-cause mortality risk was at an HbA1c of 7.4% for all DM patients, 7.0% in newly diagnosed, and 8.2% in pre-existing patients.
Conclusion: Upon comparing newly diagnosed DM patients with those with pre-existing DM, a poorer prognosis was observed in the latter group, attributed to older age and a higher burden of comorbidities. Throughout the follow-up period, maintaining consistently low HbA1c levels did not reduce the incidence of re-ACS nor enhance survival rates.
期刊介绍:
Current Vascular Pharmacology publishes clinical and research-based reviews/mini-reviews, original research articles, letters, debates, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited issues to update all those concerned with the treatment of vascular disease, bridging the gap between clinical practice and ongoing research.
Vascular disease is the commonest cause of death in Westernized countries and its incidence is on the increase in developing countries. It follows that considerable research is directed at establishing effective treatment for acute vascular events. Long-term treatment has also received considerable attention (e.g. for symptomatic relief). Furthermore, effective prevention, whether primary or secondary, is backed by the findings of several landmark trials. Vascular disease is a complex field with primary care physicians and nurse practitioners as well as several specialties involved. The latter include cardiology, vascular and cardio thoracic surgery, general medicine, radiology, clinical pharmacology and neurology (stroke units).