Construction of a 'Simple, Fast and Accurate' Evaluation Method for Profile Control and Plugging Effect of Gel Plugging Agent Based on Simulations.

IF 5.3 3区 化学 Q1 POLYMER SCIENCE Gels Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.3390/gels11020115
Zengbao Wang, Junjie Jiang, Weian Huang, Yuwei Gan, Yingrui Bai
{"title":"Construction of a 'Simple, Fast and Accurate' Evaluation Method for Profile Control and Plugging Effect of Gel Plugging Agent Based on Simulations.","authors":"Zengbao Wang, Junjie Jiang, Weian Huang, Yuwei Gan, Yingrui Bai","doi":"10.3390/gels11020115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>At present, the evaluation perspective of the gel plugging agent assessment method is incomprehensive, due to which the experimental results deviate from the field data. By analyzing the current indoor evaluation methods and the factors controlling the sealing capability of gel plugging agents, an experimental device and method for evaluating the blocking effect of oilfield gel plugging agents has been designed. In contrast to traditional assessment methods, the proposed approach offers advantages such as simple operation, rapid experimentation, and accurate results. The experimental results show that gels selected using conventional methods are inconsistent with the results of plugging displacement tests. This discrepancy can be attributed to the fact that these methods focus solely on cohesive strength while neglecting adhesive strength. Considering that the evaluation perspective of conventional methods is relatively limited, an evaluation method for the sealing effect of the plugging agent was developed. This method comprehensively incorporates factors such as cohesion strength, adhesion capability, shear resistance, and the long-term anti-dehydration performance of the gel. The evaluation results of the method were consistent with the results of the plugging displacement experiments. The newly constructed method defines <i>Γ</i> as the comprehensive evaluation parameter for the gel. A new experimental system with a comprehensive evaluation index (<i>Γ</i>) of 8.97 Pa<sup>2</sup> was selected. After the profile control of the system, the effluent ratio of the high and low permeability layers reached 1:9, and its erosion resistance was greater than 20 PV. Meanwhile, the profile control effect was also stable. Through verification based on field data, the injection pressure of the system optimized by the proposed method was found to be 2.5 times higher than that of the original system. Meanwhile, the plugging validity period was >2 times of the original system. The test results were consistent with the plugging capability evaluation index. In summary, the performance evaluation method of the designed gel plugging agent was reasonable in principle and the results were accurate and reliable. Therefore, it is considered to be of guiding significance for the selection of efficient profile control plugging agents in oilfields.</p>","PeriodicalId":12506,"journal":{"name":"Gels","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854490/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gels","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11020115","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLYMER SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At present, the evaluation perspective of the gel plugging agent assessment method is incomprehensive, due to which the experimental results deviate from the field data. By analyzing the current indoor evaluation methods and the factors controlling the sealing capability of gel plugging agents, an experimental device and method for evaluating the blocking effect of oilfield gel plugging agents has been designed. In contrast to traditional assessment methods, the proposed approach offers advantages such as simple operation, rapid experimentation, and accurate results. The experimental results show that gels selected using conventional methods are inconsistent with the results of plugging displacement tests. This discrepancy can be attributed to the fact that these methods focus solely on cohesive strength while neglecting adhesive strength. Considering that the evaluation perspective of conventional methods is relatively limited, an evaluation method for the sealing effect of the plugging agent was developed. This method comprehensively incorporates factors such as cohesion strength, adhesion capability, shear resistance, and the long-term anti-dehydration performance of the gel. The evaluation results of the method were consistent with the results of the plugging displacement experiments. The newly constructed method defines Γ as the comprehensive evaluation parameter for the gel. A new experimental system with a comprehensive evaluation index (Γ) of 8.97 Pa2 was selected. After the profile control of the system, the effluent ratio of the high and low permeability layers reached 1:9, and its erosion resistance was greater than 20 PV. Meanwhile, the profile control effect was also stable. Through verification based on field data, the injection pressure of the system optimized by the proposed method was found to be 2.5 times higher than that of the original system. Meanwhile, the plugging validity period was >2 times of the original system. The test results were consistent with the plugging capability evaluation index. In summary, the performance evaluation method of the designed gel plugging agent was reasonable in principle and the results were accurate and reliable. Therefore, it is considered to be of guiding significance for the selection of efficient profile control plugging agents in oilfields.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于仿真的凝胶堵漏剂调剖及封堵效果“简单、快速、准确”评价方法构建
目前,凝胶堵漏剂评价方法的评价视角不全面,实验结果与现场数据存在偏差。通过分析现有的室内评价方法和控制凝胶堵剂封堵能力的因素,设计了一种评价油田凝胶堵剂封堵效果的实验装置和方法。与传统的评估方法相比,该方法具有操作简单、实验速度快、结果准确等优点。实验结果表明,采用常规方法选择的凝胶与封堵驱替试验结果不一致。这种差异可归因于这些方法只关注内聚强度而忽略了粘合强度。考虑到常规封堵剂封堵效果评价方法的局限性,提出了封堵剂封堵效果评价方法。该方法综合考虑了凝胶的内聚强度、粘附能力、抗剪切能力、长期抗脱水性能等因素。该方法的评价结果与堵驱实验结果一致。该方法将Γ定义为凝胶的综合评价参数。选择综合评价指标(Γ)为8.97 Pa2的新实验体系。系统调剖后,高、低渗层出水比达到1:9,抗冲蚀能力大于20pv。同时,调剖效果稳定。通过现场数据验证,经该方法优化后的系统注入压力比原系统提高了2.5倍。同时,堵塞有效期是原系统的2倍。试验结果与堵漏能力评价指标一致。综上所述,所设计的凝胶堵漏剂性能评价方法原理合理,结果准确可靠。因此,对油田高效调剖堵剂的选择具有指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gels
Gels POLYMER SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
19.60%
发文量
707
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Gels (ISSN 2310-2861) is an international, open access journal on physical (supramolecular) and chemical gel-based materials. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the maximum length of the papers, and full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Short communications, full research papers and review papers are accepted formats for the preparation of the manuscripts. Gels aims to serve as a reference journal with a focus on gel materials for researchers working in both academia and industry. Therefore, papers demonstrating practical applications of these materials are particularly welcome. Occasionally, invited contributions (i.e., original research and review articles) on emerging issues and high-tech applications of gels are published as special issues.
期刊最新文献
Synergistic Effects and Mechanisms of Plant Ash and Activator on Geopolymer Gel Formation, Hydration Evolution and Mechanical Properties. Gel-Inspired Trapping Networks: Fe(III)-Activated Palygorskite Nanorod Aggregates for Enhanced Congo Red Sequestration. Sustainable Date Palm Biomass Hydrogel Improves Soil Hydro-Physical Properties and Tomato Growth Under Arid Conditions. Perfusion-Limited Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Adipose Tissue Grafts. Alginate-Based Hydrogels: Recent Progress in Preparation, Property Tuning, and Multifunctional Applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1