Magnetic Resonance Imaging Relaxometry for Glioblastoma Response Assessment During Radiation Therapy on a 0.35 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging Linear Accelerator

Natalia Lutsik MD , Siamak P. Nejad-Davarani PhD , Alessandro Valderrama BS , Janette Herr MS , Kaylie Cullison PhD , Danilo Maziero PhD , Macarena I. de la Fuente MD , Gregory J. Kubicek MD , Jessica J. Meshman MD , Gregory A. Azzam MD, PhD , Tess Armstrong PhD , Radka S. Stoyanova PhD , Eric A. Mellon MD, PhD
{"title":"Magnetic Resonance Imaging Relaxometry for Glioblastoma Response Assessment During Radiation Therapy on a 0.35 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging Linear Accelerator","authors":"Natalia Lutsik MD ,&nbsp;Siamak P. Nejad-Davarani PhD ,&nbsp;Alessandro Valderrama BS ,&nbsp;Janette Herr MS ,&nbsp;Kaylie Cullison PhD ,&nbsp;Danilo Maziero PhD ,&nbsp;Macarena I. de la Fuente MD ,&nbsp;Gregory J. Kubicek MD ,&nbsp;Jessica J. Meshman MD ,&nbsp;Gregory A. Azzam MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tess Armstrong PhD ,&nbsp;Radka S. Stoyanova PhD ,&nbsp;Eric A. Mellon MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The integration of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and linear accelerator (MRI-Linac) enables daily imaging during radiation therapy (RT). This study implements MRI-Linac relaxometry to evaluate quantitative imaging changes in patients with glioblastoma during RT and identify associations with disease progression and survival outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>Thirty-eight patients with glioblastoma were treated on a 0.35 T MRI-Linac with Strategically Acquired Gradient Echo and T2 multiecho acquisitions every other day. Per voxel changes in tumor T2, T2*, and T1 values were assessed by parametric response mapping comparing each treatment fraction with pre-RT baselines. Statistical analyses included the Wilcoxon test for group comparisons and Cox proportional hazards models for survival associations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Progressors had higher proportions of voxels with increased T2 values at week 2 (49% vs 40%, <em>P =</em> .008) and week 6 (58% vs 43%, <em>P =</em> .012) and higher T2* values at week 1 (47% vs 43%, <em>P =</em> .016), week 2 (48% vs 43%, <em>P =</em> .016), week 3 (50% vs 44%, <em>P =</em> .012), and the final week (53% vs 43%, <em>P =</em> .021). Cox modeling linked increased T2 values at week 4 with overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 4.72; 95% CI, 1.24-12.9) and progression-free survival (HR, 9.26; 95% CI, 1.88-24.5). Increased T2* values at weeks 2 and 3 correlated with progression-free survival (HR, 5.02; 95% CI, 1.44-17.6; HR, 6.04; 95% CI, 1.59-22.9) and overall survival at week 3 (HR, 3.09; 95% CI, 0.94-10.1).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Quantitative changes in T2 and T2* values during RT, particularly in weeks 3 to 4, were associated with progression and survival outcomes. Early detection of poor responders may enable therapy adaptation, improving glioblastoma treatment outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":"122 3","pages":"Pages 583-591"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036030162500149X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The integration of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and linear accelerator (MRI-Linac) enables daily imaging during radiation therapy (RT). This study implements MRI-Linac relaxometry to evaluate quantitative imaging changes in patients with glioblastoma during RT and identify associations with disease progression and survival outcomes.

Methods and Materials

Thirty-eight patients with glioblastoma were treated on a 0.35 T MRI-Linac with Strategically Acquired Gradient Echo and T2 multiecho acquisitions every other day. Per voxel changes in tumor T2, T2*, and T1 values were assessed by parametric response mapping comparing each treatment fraction with pre-RT baselines. Statistical analyses included the Wilcoxon test for group comparisons and Cox proportional hazards models for survival associations.

Results

Progressors had higher proportions of voxels with increased T2 values at week 2 (49% vs 40%, P = .008) and week 6 (58% vs 43%, P = .012) and higher T2* values at week 1 (47% vs 43%, P = .016), week 2 (48% vs 43%, P = .016), week 3 (50% vs 44%, P = .012), and the final week (53% vs 43%, P = .021). Cox modeling linked increased T2 values at week 4 with overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 4.72; 95% CI, 1.24-12.9) and progression-free survival (HR, 9.26; 95% CI, 1.88-24.5). Increased T2* values at weeks 2 and 3 correlated with progression-free survival (HR, 5.02; 95% CI, 1.44-17.6; HR, 6.04; 95% CI, 1.59-22.9) and overall survival at week 3 (HR, 3.09; 95% CI, 0.94-10.1).

Conclusions

Quantitative changes in T2 and T2* values during RT, particularly in weeks 3 to 4, were associated with progression and survival outcomes. Early detection of poor responders may enable therapy adaptation, improving glioblastoma treatment outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 0.35 T 磁共振成像直线加速器进行放射治疗期间胶质母细胞瘤反应评估的磁共振成像弛豫测量法。
背景与目的:MRI与直线加速器(MRI- linac)的集成使放射治疗(RT)期间的日常成像成为可能。本研究采用MRI-Linac松弛仪来评估胶质母细胞瘤患者在RT期间的定量成像变化,并确定与疾病进展和生存结果的关联。材料和方法:38例胶质母细胞瘤患者每隔一天接受0.35T mri线性扫描,策略性获得梯度回波(STAGE)和T2多回波采集。通过参数化反应映射,将每个治疗分数与rt前基线进行比较,评估肿瘤T2、T2*和T1值的每体素变化。统计分析包括组间比较的Wilcoxon检验和生存关联的Cox比例风险模型。结果:寻常有更高比例的体素与T2值增加2周(49%比40%,p = 0.008)和星期6(58%比43%,p = 0.012)和更高的T2 *值周1(47%比43%,p = 0.016),第2周(48%比43%,p = 0.016),周3(50%比44%,p = 0.012),和最后一周(53%比43%,p = 0.021)。Cox模型将第4周T2值升高与总生存期(HR = 4.72,95% CI: 1.24-12.9)和无进展生存期(HR = 9.26,95% CI: 1.88-24.5)联系起来。第2周和第3周T2*值升高与无进展生存相关(HR = 5.02,95% CI: 1.44-17.6;HR = 6.04,95% CI: 1.59-22.9)和第3周总生存率(HR = 3.09,95% CI: 0.94-10.1)。结论:T2和T2*值在RT期间的定量变化,特别是在第3-4周,与进展和生存结果相关。早期发现不良反应可能使治疗适应,改善胶质母细胞瘤的治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
期刊最新文献
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With Pembrolizumab in PD-1 Inhibitor Refractory, Recurrent or Metastatic, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Phase 2 Trial. Practical Aspects of Delivering Radiation for Poly-metastatic Disease. Stereotactic body radiotherapy with continued first-line PD-1 inhibitor-based therapy as a resistance-overcoming strategy in oligoprogressive hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective phase II clinical study. Gaining New Ground: The Evolving Role of Radiation Therapy in Esophageal Cancer. Radiation Therapy Target Objectives For Tonsillar Cancer Treated with Unilateral Radiation Therapy - A Replanning Study From TROG 12.01.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1