Regional Near-Surface Dose Predicts Moist Desquamation and Implant Failure in Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.02.010
Kamran Salari MD , Joseph S. Lee MD, PhD , Derek A. Mumaw MD , Muayad F. Almahariq MD, PhD , Thomas J. Quinn MD , Alicia Bui BS , Veronica Abbott MS , Julie Kroetsch MS , Joshua T. Dilworth MD, PhD
{"title":"Regional Near-Surface Dose Predicts Moist Desquamation and Implant Failure in Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer","authors":"Kamran Salari MD ,&nbsp;Joseph S. Lee MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Derek A. Mumaw MD ,&nbsp;Muayad F. Almahariq MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Thomas J. Quinn MD ,&nbsp;Alicia Bui BS ,&nbsp;Veronica Abbott MS ,&nbsp;Julie Kroetsch MS ,&nbsp;Joshua T. Dilworth MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>We correlated regional near-surface dose with toxic effects and implant complications in patients receiving breast or chest wall irradiation. We also compared toxic effects and implant complications between patients receiving photon or proton irradiation with prospective near-surface dose optimization.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>Patients at a single institution who received conventionally fractionated breast or chest wall and regional nodal irradiation from 2017 to 2022 were included. Near-surface rinds (SR3, defined as the volume bound by the breast or chest wall planning target volume and 3 mm in from the skin) were generated for all patients for analysis. SR3 volumes were used prospectively during proton treatment. SR3 volumes were retrospectively subdivided into axillary SR3, nonaxillary SR3, and inframammary SR3 regions. The discrimination performance of near-surface dosimetry for skin and implant toxicity was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events toxicity was compared between patients receiving photon versus proton irradiation using the Pearson χ<sup>2</sup> test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 223 patients, 157 and 66 received photon and proton irradiation, respectively. Axillary SR3 D2cc was the strongest dosimetric predictor of moist desquamation (AUC = 0.657, <em>P</em> = .007) and implant failure (AUC = 0.880, <em>P</em> = .017), driven by a stronger predictive ability for moist desquamation in the axillary fold (AUC = 0.728, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). With axillary SR3 D2cc ≤48 Gy versus &gt;48 Gy, rates of moist desquamation were 25.8% versus 48.5% (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), respectively, and rates of implant failure were 0% versus 20% (<em>P</em> = .006). Rates of moist desquamation (38.2% vs 27.3%, <em>P</em> = .12), unplanned reconstructive surgery (35.1% vs 18.8%, <em>P</em> = .21), and implant failure (8.8% vs 6.3%, <em>P</em> &gt; .99) were similar between patients receiving photon versus proton irradiation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Near-surface dose predicts moist desquamation and implant failure in patients receiving either photon or proton irradiation of the breast or chest wall. Consideration should be given to limit axillary SR3 D2cc ≤48 Gy in appropriately selected patients considered low-risk of skin involvement of cancer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":"122 5","pages":"Pages 1143-1157"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301625001488","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

We correlated regional near-surface dose with toxic effects and implant complications in patients receiving breast or chest wall irradiation. We also compared toxic effects and implant complications between patients receiving photon or proton irradiation with prospective near-surface dose optimization.

Methods and Materials

Patients at a single institution who received conventionally fractionated breast or chest wall and regional nodal irradiation from 2017 to 2022 were included. Near-surface rinds (SR3, defined as the volume bound by the breast or chest wall planning target volume and 3 mm in from the skin) were generated for all patients for analysis. SR3 volumes were used prospectively during proton treatment. SR3 volumes were retrospectively subdivided into axillary SR3, nonaxillary SR3, and inframammary SR3 regions. The discrimination performance of near-surface dosimetry for skin and implant toxicity was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events toxicity was compared between patients receiving photon versus proton irradiation using the Pearson χ2 test.

Results

Of 223 patients, 157 and 66 received photon and proton irradiation, respectively. Axillary SR3 D2cc was the strongest dosimetric predictor of moist desquamation (AUC = 0.657, P = .007) and implant failure (AUC = 0.880, P = .017), driven by a stronger predictive ability for moist desquamation in the axillary fold (AUC = 0.728, P < .001). With axillary SR3 D2cc ≤48 Gy versus >48 Gy, rates of moist desquamation were 25.8% versus 48.5% (P < .001), respectively, and rates of implant failure were 0% versus 20% (P = .006). Rates of moist desquamation (38.2% vs 27.3%, P = .12), unplanned reconstructive surgery (35.1% vs 18.8%, P = .21), and implant failure (8.8% vs 6.3%, P > .99) were similar between patients receiving photon versus proton irradiation.

Conclusions

Near-surface dose predicts moist desquamation and implant failure in patients receiving either photon or proton irradiation of the breast or chest wall. Consideration should be given to limit axillary SR3 D2cc ≤48 Gy in appropriately selected patients considered low-risk of skin involvement of cancer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部近表面剂量预测乳腺癌放疗患者湿脱屑和植入物失败。
目的/目标:我们将乳房或胸壁照射患者的区域近表面剂量与毒性反应和植入并发症联系起来。我们还比较了接受前瞻性近表面剂量优化的光子或质子照射患者的毒性反应和植入并发症:纳入了2017-2022年在一家机构接受常规分次乳腺或胸壁及区域结节照射的患者。为所有患者生成近表面边缘(SR3,定义为乳房或胸壁 PTV 边界和距皮肤 3 毫米处的体积)进行分析。SR3 体积在质子治疗过程中被前瞻性地使用。回顾性地将 SR3 体积细分为腋窝 SR3、非腋窝 SR3 和乳房下 SR3 区域。使用接收者操作曲线下面积(AUC)评估了近表面剂量测定对皮肤和植入物毒性的辨别性能。使用皮尔逊卡方检验比较了接受光子和质子照射的患者的 CTCAE 毒性:223名患者中,分别有157人和66人接受了光子和质子照射。腋窝 SR3 D2cc 是湿性脱屑(AUC=0.657,p=0.007)和植入失败(AUC=0.880,p=0.017)的最强剂量学预测因子,对腋窝皱褶湿性脱屑的预测能力更强(AUC=0.728,p 48 Gy,湿性脱屑率分别为 25.8%和 48.5%(p0.99)),接受光子和质子照射的患者之间的预测能力相似:结论:近表面剂量可预测乳房或胸壁接受光子或质子照射患者的湿性脱屑和植入失败。对于经过适当选择、被认为皮肤受累癌症风险较低的患者,应考虑将腋窝 SR3 D2cc 限制在 48 Gy 以下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
期刊最新文献
Dosimetric Comparison of CyberKnife and Conventional Linac Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Plans: Analysis of the PACE-B Study A Phase 2 Trial of Radium223 and Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy in Hormone-Naïve Men with Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer to Bone: The RadSABR Study The Impact of Ultracentral Tumor Location on Outcomes in Patients with Pulmonary Oligometastases: A Secondary Analysis of the Single-Arm Phase 2 SABR-5 Trial Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Oligoprogressive Disease in Androgen-Suppressed Prostate Cancer: Primary Endpoint Analysis of the TRAP Trial PSMA-PET-Guided Intraprostatic Boost in Prostate SBRT (PROBE): A Phase 2 Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1