“A 7-year analysis of complaints related to Asian blepharoplasty”

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1111/jocd.16271
Xueshang Su MM, Dan Chen MD, Jun Zhuang MM, Jintian Hu MD, Na Cai BS, Yangxue Ou MD, Haixia Jiang BS, Bo Ding MD
{"title":"“A 7-year analysis of complaints related to Asian blepharoplasty”","authors":"Xueshang Su MM,&nbsp;Dan Chen MD,&nbsp;Jun Zhuang MM,&nbsp;Jintian Hu MD,&nbsp;Na Cai BS,&nbsp;Yangxue Ou MD,&nbsp;Haixia Jiang BS,&nbsp;Bo Ding MD","doi":"10.1111/jocd.16271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>People often have high expectations for blepharoplasty, and patient complaints can serve as a valuable tool to understand their specific requirements and desired outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The objective of this study was to analyze blepharoplasty complaints and identify patient concerns regarding postoperative effects, surgical difficulties, and potential pitfalls.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective analysis of 138 complaints related to blepharoplasty was conducted. We documented demographic information and complaints details, and compared the reason of complaints between primary and revision double eyelid operations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, primary double eyelid operation was found to have the highest number of complaints. “Asymmetry” is the most frequent cause of dissatisfaction in both primary and revision double eyelid surgeries, and “asymmetric crease height” accounted for the majority of complaints in this category. Compared with primary double eyelid operation, revision double eyelid operation was more likely to be complained for “asymmetric crease shape”, and the difference was statistically significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The most common reasons for complaints following lower blepharoplasty, epicanthoplasty, and eyebrow lift procedures were “incomplete resection of under-eye puffiness”, “asymmetry”, and “upper eyelid laxity”, respectively. Compared to lower blepharoplasty and eyebrow lift, primary and revision double eyelid surgeries as well as epicanthoplasty are more prone to complaints of “asymmetry”. In contrast, compared to primary double eyelid operation, epicanthoplasty is more likely to result in complaints of “noticeable scarring”.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Complaints regarding blepharoplasty can reflect patients' expectations and requirements, as well as the challenges and pitfalls of the surgical procedure. This information can assist physicians in enhancing their comprehension of patients' needs and paying closer attention to the difficulties and potential complications associated with surgery.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","volume":"24 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jocd.16271","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocd.16271","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

People often have high expectations for blepharoplasty, and patient complaints can serve as a valuable tool to understand their specific requirements and desired outcomes.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to analyze blepharoplasty complaints and identify patient concerns regarding postoperative effects, surgical difficulties, and potential pitfalls.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 138 complaints related to blepharoplasty was conducted. We documented demographic information and complaints details, and compared the reason of complaints between primary and revision double eyelid operations.

Results

In this study, primary double eyelid operation was found to have the highest number of complaints. “Asymmetry” is the most frequent cause of dissatisfaction in both primary and revision double eyelid surgeries, and “asymmetric crease height” accounted for the majority of complaints in this category. Compared with primary double eyelid operation, revision double eyelid operation was more likely to be complained for “asymmetric crease shape”, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The most common reasons for complaints following lower blepharoplasty, epicanthoplasty, and eyebrow lift procedures were “incomplete resection of under-eye puffiness”, “asymmetry”, and “upper eyelid laxity”, respectively. Compared to lower blepharoplasty and eyebrow lift, primary and revision double eyelid surgeries as well as epicanthoplasty are more prone to complaints of “asymmetry”. In contrast, compared to primary double eyelid operation, epicanthoplasty is more likely to result in complaints of “noticeable scarring”.

Conclusions

Complaints regarding blepharoplasty can reflect patients' expectations and requirements, as well as the challenges and pitfalls of the surgical procedure. This information can assist physicians in enhancing their comprehension of patients' needs and paying closer attention to the difficulties and potential complications associated with surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“亚洲人眼睑成形术相关投诉的7年分析”。
背景:人们通常对眼睑成形术有很高的期望,患者的投诉可以作为了解其具体要求和期望结果的有价值的工具。目的:本研究的目的是分析眼睑成形术的投诉,并确定患者对术后效果、手术困难和潜在陷阱的关注。方法:对138例眼睑成形术患者的投诉进行回顾性分析。我们记录了人口统计信息和投诉细节,并比较了原发和修复双眼皮手术的投诉原因。结果:在本研究中,发现原发性双眼皮手术有最多的投诉。“不对称”是最常见的不满意的双眼皮手术和修复,“不对称折痕高度”占了这类投诉的大多数。与原发双眼皮手术相比,改型双眼皮手术因“折痕形状不对称”而被投诉的比例更高,差异有统计学意义(p)。结论:对双眼皮成形术的投诉可以反映患者的期望和要求,以及手术过程中的挑战和陷阱。这些信息可以帮助医生提高他们对患者需求的理解,并更加关注与手术相关的困难和潜在并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
818
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology publishes high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cosmetic dermatology with the aim to foster the highest standards of patient care in cosmetic dermatology. Published quarterly, the Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology facilitates continuing professional development and provides a forum for the exchange of scientific research and innovative techniques. The scope of coverage includes, but will not be limited to: healthy skin; skin maintenance; ageing skin; photodamage and photoprotection; rejuvenation; biochemistry, endocrinology and neuroimmunology of healthy skin; imaging; skin measurement; quality of life; skin types; sensitive skin; rosacea and acne; sebum; sweat; fat; phlebology; hair conservation, restoration and removal; nails and nail surgery; pigment; psychological and medicolegal issues; retinoids; cosmetic chemistry; dermopharmacy; cosmeceuticals; toiletries; striae; cellulite; cosmetic dermatological surgery; blepharoplasty; liposuction; surgical complications; botulinum; fillers, peels and dermabrasion; local and tumescent anaesthesia; electrosurgery; lasers, including laser physics, laser research and safety, vascular lasers, pigment lasers, hair removal lasers, tattoo removal lasers, resurfacing lasers, dermal remodelling lasers and laser complications.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Effectiveness, Tolerability, and Safety of the Adjunctive Use of Microneedling With Tranexamic Acid in the Treatment of Melasma. Punch Excision Combined With Radiotherapy for Keloid Treatment. Effects of Autologous Blood-Derived Extracellular Vesicles on Skin Regeneration and Anti-Aging: A Clinical Study. Efficacy and Safety of Amino Acid-Enriched Hyaluronic Acid in Facial Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Comment on: Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy in Melasma Using Microinjections and Microneedling Techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1