Species-Specific Sensitivity and Levels of Beta-D-Glucan for the Diagnosis of Candidemia-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 4.2 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Journal of Fungi Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI:10.3390/jof11020149
Nadir Ullah, Marco Muccio, Laura Magnasco, Chiara Sepulcri, Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Antonio Vena, Matteo Bassetti, Malgorzata Mikulska
{"title":"Species-Specific Sensitivity and Levels of Beta-D-Glucan for the Diagnosis of Candidemia-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Nadir Ullah, Marco Muccio, Laura Magnasco, Chiara Sepulcri, Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Antonio Vena, Matteo Bassetti, Malgorzata Mikulska","doi":"10.3390/jof11020149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>1, 3-ß-D-Glucan (BDG) is an antigen present in the cell wall of many pathogenic fungi and is used as a marker for the early diagnosis of candidemia and discontinuation of empirical treatment. Changes in the epidemiology of <i>Candida</i> species might have a negative impact on the performance of serum BDG. The aim of this study was to analyze the performance of BDG in candidemia diagnosis focusing on species-specific differences in BDG sensitivity and BDG levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PRISMA system was used for the systematic search. The following databases were searched for articles published from January 2010 to November 2023: PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 studies that met the inclusion criteria were included, reporting data from 1633 patients with candidemia; 11 reported both sensitivity and specificity, 15 reported species-specific sensitivity, and nine reported species-specific BDG levels. The pooled sensitivity of BDG in all studies was 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.66-0.80), while the pooled sensitivity and specificity in 11 studies were 0.81 (95% CI 0.73-0.89) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.74-0.87). BDG pooled sensitivity (all assays) and BDG levels (for assays with cutoff of 80 pg/mL) were the highest in <i>C. krusei</i> (currently <i>Pichia kudriavzevii</i>) and the lowest in <i>C. auris</i>: 0.76 and 417 pg/mL for <i>C. krusei</i>, 0.73 and 345 pg/mL for <i>C. albicans</i>, 0.74 and 356 pg/mL for <i>C. glabrata</i> (currently <i>Nakaseomyces glabrata</i>), 0.70 and 324 pg/mL for <i>C. tropicalis</i>, 0.63 and 95 pg/mL for <i>C. parapsilosis,</i> 0.51 and 62 pg/mL for <i>C. auris,</i> and 0.44 and 79 pg/mL for other <i>Candida</i> species. These differences were statistically significant for BDG sensitivity and levels of <i>C. albicans</i>, <i>C. glabrata</i>, <i>C. krusei</i>, and <i>C. tropicalis</i> compared to <i>C. auris</i>, <i>C. parapsilosis</i>, and other <i>Candida</i> species.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sensitivity of BDG in candidemia diagnosis depends on the <i>Candida</i> species, with the lowest being for <i>C. auris</i> and <i>C. parapsilosis</i>. This might have a clinical impact in centers where these species are prevalent.</p>","PeriodicalId":15878,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fungi","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11856011/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fungi","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11020149","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: 1, 3-ß-D-Glucan (BDG) is an antigen present in the cell wall of many pathogenic fungi and is used as a marker for the early diagnosis of candidemia and discontinuation of empirical treatment. Changes in the epidemiology of Candida species might have a negative impact on the performance of serum BDG. The aim of this study was to analyze the performance of BDG in candidemia diagnosis focusing on species-specific differences in BDG sensitivity and BDG levels.

Methods: The PRISMA system was used for the systematic search. The following databases were searched for articles published from January 2010 to November 2023: PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus.

Results: A total of 21 studies that met the inclusion criteria were included, reporting data from 1633 patients with candidemia; 11 reported both sensitivity and specificity, 15 reported species-specific sensitivity, and nine reported species-specific BDG levels. The pooled sensitivity of BDG in all studies was 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.66-0.80), while the pooled sensitivity and specificity in 11 studies were 0.81 (95% CI 0.73-0.89) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.74-0.87). BDG pooled sensitivity (all assays) and BDG levels (for assays with cutoff of 80 pg/mL) were the highest in C. krusei (currently Pichia kudriavzevii) and the lowest in C. auris: 0.76 and 417 pg/mL for C. krusei, 0.73 and 345 pg/mL for C. albicans, 0.74 and 356 pg/mL for C. glabrata (currently Nakaseomyces glabrata), 0.70 and 324 pg/mL for C. tropicalis, 0.63 and 95 pg/mL for C. parapsilosis, 0.51 and 62 pg/mL for C. auris, and 0.44 and 79 pg/mL for other Candida species. These differences were statistically significant for BDG sensitivity and levels of C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. krusei, and C. tropicalis compared to C. auris, C. parapsilosis, and other Candida species.

Conclusion: The sensitivity of BDG in candidemia diagnosis depends on the Candida species, with the lowest being for C. auris and C. parapsilosis. This might have a clinical impact in centers where these species are prevalent.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
β - d -葡聚糖诊断念珠菌病的物种特异性敏感性和水平:系统评价和荟萃分析。
背景:1,3 -ß- d -葡聚糖(BDG)是一种存在于许多病原真菌细胞壁的抗原,被用作念珠菌病早期诊断和停止经验治疗的标志物。念珠菌种类的流行病学变化可能对血清BDG的性能产生负面影响。本研究的目的是分析BDG在念珠菌诊断中的表现,重点是BDG敏感性和BDG水平的物种特异性差异。方法:采用PRISMA系统进行系统检索。检索了2010年1月至2023年11月期间发表的文章:PubMed、Science Direct和Scopus。结果:共纳入21项符合纳入标准的研究,报告了1633例念珠菌患者的数据;11个报告了敏感性和特异性,15个报告了物种特异性敏感性,9个报告了物种特异性BDG水平。所有研究中BDG的合并敏感性为0.73(95%可信区间(CI)为0.66 ~ 0.80),11项研究的合并敏感性和特异性分别为0.81 (95% CI 0.73 ~ 0.89)和0.80 (95% CI 0.74 ~ 0.87)。中心汇集敏感性(化验)和中心水平楼楼(化验截止80 pg / mL)是最高的c . krusei(目前毕赤酵母属kudriavzevii)和c·奥瑞丝:最低为0.76和417 pg / mL c . krusei 0.73和345 pg / mL为白念珠菌,0.74和356 pg / mL c glabrata(目前Nakaseomyces glabrata), 0.70和324 pg / mL c . tropicalis 0.63和95 pg / mL c . parapsilosis 0.51和62 pg / mL c .耳和0.44和其他念珠菌属物种79 pg / mL。与耳假丝酵母菌、假丝酵母菌和其他假丝酵母菌相比,白色假丝酵母菌、光滑假丝酵母菌、克氏假丝酵母菌和热带假丝酵母菌的BDG敏感性和水平差异具有统计学意义。结论:BDG在念珠菌诊断中的敏感性与念珠菌种类有关,对金黄色念珠菌和副念珠菌的敏感性最低。这可能会对这些物种普遍存在的中心产生临床影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Fungi
Journal of Fungi Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
14.90%
发文量
1151
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Fungi (ISSN 2309-608X) is an international, peer-reviewed scientific open access journal that provides an advanced forum for studies related to pathogenic fungi, fungal biology, and all other aspects of fungal research. The journal publishes reviews, regular research papers, and communications in quarterly issues. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on paper length. Full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
期刊最新文献
Neonatal Candidemia in Latin America: Trends, Resistance, and Prevention Strategies (2008-2025). Novel Nitric Oxide-Releasing Formulations Show Fungicidal Potential for Superficial Dermatophyte Infection. Aspergillosis: An Update on Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Diagnosis, Susceptibility, and Treatment. Sustaining Ecological Functional Zones: The Stabilizing Role of Common Fungi Against Warming Revealed by Altitudinal Transect. A New Species Bussabanomyces oryzae Isolated from Rice and Beneficial Application in Rice Seedling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1