Occlusion and Biomechanical Risk Factors in Implant-Supported Full-Arch Fixed Dental Prostheses-Narrative Review.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Personalized Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.3390/jpm15020065
Andrea Berzaghi, Tiziano Testori, Riccardo Scaini, Sergio Bortolini
{"title":"Occlusion and Biomechanical Risk Factors in Implant-Supported Full-Arch Fixed Dental Prostheses-Narrative Review.","authors":"Andrea Berzaghi, Tiziano Testori, Riccardo Scaini, Sergio Bortolini","doi":"10.3390/jpm15020065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The biophysiological differences between teeth and dental implants and the issue of occlusal overload, although controversial, form the basis for the management of occlusion in implant-supported full-arch fixed dental prostheses (ISFAFDPs). Although there is currently a lack of scientific evidence on occlusal management, it is clear that the favorable prognosis of ISFAFDPs is linked to a correct understanding of the biomechanical principles involved. In the design of ISFAFDPs, the lack of proprioceptive feedback requires special attention to biomechanical factors: minimizing overloading complications and providing biomechanical stability are among the main goals of the occlusion. In ISFAFDPs, the occlusion must be decided on the basis of several factors that influence the loads on prosthesis and implants: each case must be evaluated individually and requires a personalized occlusion. The main aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the occlusal principles and materials that can be used in ISFAFDPs based on the data currently available in the literature. Practical clinical recommendations for the occlusion management of ISFAFDPs and a biomechanical risk score index to personalize implant-prosthetic treatment are proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11856061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15020065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The biophysiological differences between teeth and dental implants and the issue of occlusal overload, although controversial, form the basis for the management of occlusion in implant-supported full-arch fixed dental prostheses (ISFAFDPs). Although there is currently a lack of scientific evidence on occlusal management, it is clear that the favorable prognosis of ISFAFDPs is linked to a correct understanding of the biomechanical principles involved. In the design of ISFAFDPs, the lack of proprioceptive feedback requires special attention to biomechanical factors: minimizing overloading complications and providing biomechanical stability are among the main goals of the occlusion. In ISFAFDPs, the occlusion must be decided on the basis of several factors that influence the loads on prosthesis and implants: each case must be evaluated individually and requires a personalized occlusion. The main aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the occlusal principles and materials that can be used in ISFAFDPs based on the data currently available in the literature. Practical clinical recommendations for the occlusion management of ISFAFDPs and a biomechanical risk score index to personalize implant-prosthetic treatment are proposed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种植体支持的全弓固定牙修复体的咬合和生物力学风险因素--叙述性综述。
尽管存在争议,但牙齿和种植体之间的生物生理学差异以及咬合负荷问题构成了种植体支持的全弓固定义齿(ISFAFDPs)咬合管理的基础。虽然目前缺乏关于咬合管理的科学证据,但很明显,ISFAFDPs的良好预后与正确理解所涉及的生物力学原理有关。在isfafdp的设计中,缺乏本体感觉反馈需要特别注意生物力学因素:最小化超载并发症和提供生物力学稳定性是闭塞的主要目标之一。在isfafdp中,必须根据影响假体和种植体负荷的几个因素来决定咬合:每个病例必须单独评估,并需要个性化的咬合。这篇叙述性综述的主要目的是根据文献中现有的数据,概述可用于isfafdp的咬合原理和材料。提出了ISFAFDPs闭塞管理的实用临床建议和个性化种植-假体治疗的生物力学风险评分指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
期刊最新文献
How to Undertake Personalized Assessments and Administer Cures for Pain. Effect of Rehabilitation Program for Muscle Strength, Balance, and Gait Retraining with Visual Feedback in Older Women with and Without Knee Osteoarthritis: Clinical Trial. Correction: Hansen et al. Two-Year Results of 0.01% Atropine Eye Drops and 0.1% Loading Dose for Myopia Progression Reduction in Danish Children: A Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14, 175. Age-Related Differences in Optical Coherence Tomography and Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Parameters Between Healthy Children and Adults: A Comparative Analysis in a Caucasian Population. Correction: Degni et al. Safety of Primary Tracheoesophageal Puncture in Patients Submitted to Enlarged Total Laryngectomy with Pectoralis Major Reconstruction. J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15, 435.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1