Assessing the Relationship Between Chronic Pain and Cognition: A NIDILRR and VA TBI Model Systems Collaborative Project.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-03 DOI:10.1097/HTR.0000000000001045
Mackenzie Peckham, Cynthia L Beaulieu, Kaitlin Hays, Marissa Lundstern, Bria MacIntyre, Candice Osborne, Amanda Rabinowitz, Allan L Service, Mitch Sevigny, Katherine Abbasi, William C Walker, Abigail Welch, Candace Tefertiller
{"title":"Assessing the Relationship Between Chronic Pain and Cognition: A NIDILRR and VA TBI Model Systems Collaborative Project.","authors":"Mackenzie Peckham, Cynthia L Beaulieu, Kaitlin Hays, Marissa Lundstern, Bria MacIntyre, Candice Osborne, Amanda Rabinowitz, Allan L Service, Mitch Sevigny, Katherine Abbasi, William C Walker, Abigail Welch, Candace Tefertiller","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the associations between current chronic pain and cognition and current chronic head pain and cognition in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 1762 participants from the TBI Model Systems who endorsed experiencing current chronic pain and who completed the Current Chronic Pain survey.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of a subset of data collected through a multi-site, cross-sectional observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Cognition as measured by the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with TBI who reported current chronic pain exhibited lower cognitive performance compared to those who reported no pain. Among individuals who reported pain, greater pain intensity and pain interference were negatively associated with cognition, resulting in poorer cognitive performance. The negative association was even greater for individuals acknowledging chronic head pain compared to pain from other body locations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The negative association between current chronic pain and cognition for individuals with TBI indicates the need to consider pain intensity and pain interference as factors possibly influencing cognitive ability.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"356-367"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12353080/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the associations between current chronic pain and cognition and current chronic head pain and cognition in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Setting: Community.

Participants: A total of 1762 participants from the TBI Model Systems who endorsed experiencing current chronic pain and who completed the Current Chronic Pain survey.

Design: Secondary analysis of a subset of data collected through a multi-site, cross-sectional observational cohort study.

Main outcome measures: Cognition as measured by the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT).

Results: Individuals with TBI who reported current chronic pain exhibited lower cognitive performance compared to those who reported no pain. Among individuals who reported pain, greater pain intensity and pain interference were negatively associated with cognition, resulting in poorer cognitive performance. The negative association was even greater for individuals acknowledging chronic head pain compared to pain from other body locations.

Conclusion: The negative association between current chronic pain and cognition for individuals with TBI indicates the need to consider pain intensity and pain interference as factors possibly influencing cognitive ability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估慢性疼痛与认知之间的关系:NIDILRR和VA TBI模型系统合作项目。
目的:探讨外伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者当前慢性疼痛与认知及当前慢性头痛与认知的关系。设置:社区。参与者:共有1762名来自TBI模型系统的参与者,他们认可正在经历慢性疼痛,并完成了当前慢性疼痛调查。设计:对通过多地点、横断面观察性队列研究收集的数据子集进行二次分析。主要观察指标:认知能力以成人简短电话认知测验(BTACT)测量。结果:报告当前慢性疼痛的TBI个体表现出较低的认知能力,而那些报告没有疼痛的个体。在报告疼痛的个体中,更大的疼痛强度和疼痛干扰与认知呈负相关,导致认知表现较差。与其他身体部位的疼痛相比,承认慢性头部疼痛的人的负面关联更大。结论:TBI患者当前慢性疼痛与认知之间存在负相关关系,提示需要考虑疼痛强度和疼痛干扰可能是影响认知能力的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).
期刊最新文献
Military Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Predicts Greater Negative Metacognitive Bias. Handling Missing Data in Longitudinal Rehabilitation Research: A Methodological Demonstration With Functional Trajectories of Older Adults With TBI. Risk Factors for Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo in an Acutely Concussed Adolescent Population. Prospective Assessment of Improvement and Decline in Global Functioning After Traumatic Brain Injury Using Multistate Markov Models. Research Letter: Scoping Review of the Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patient Assets, Risks, and Experiences (PRAPARE®) to Evaluate Social Determinants of Health Among Persons With TBI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1