Neurophysiological Markers of Adaptation and Compensation Following Lower Limb Amputation: An Analysis of EEG Oscillations and Clinical Predictors from the DEFINE Cohort Study.

IF 3 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurology International Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.3390/neurolint17020021
Guilherme J M Lacerda, Valton Costa, Lucas Camargo, Linamara R Battistella, Marta Imamura, Felipe Fregni
{"title":"Neurophysiological Markers of Adaptation and Compensation Following Lower Limb Amputation: An Analysis of EEG Oscillations and Clinical Predictors from the DEFINE Cohort Study.","authors":"Guilherme J M Lacerda, Valton Costa, Lucas Camargo, Linamara R Battistella, Marta Imamura, Felipe Fregni","doi":"10.3390/neurolint17020021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Neuroplasticity, involving cortical and subcortical reorganization, plays a critical role in the adaptation and compensation process post-amputation. However, underlying neurophysiological changes remain unclear, particularly in brain oscillations. <b>Methods:</b> This is a cross-sectional analysis that includes baseline data from 48 individuals with lower limb amputation from our DEFINE Cohort Study project. EEG data were collected using a 64-channel system during a 5-min resting-state period. Preprocessed data were analyzed for delta and alpha oscillations across frontal, central, and parietal regions. Logistic regression models examined associations between EEG oscillations and clinical variables, including cognition (MoCA), functional independence (FIM), and phantom limb sensations (PLS). <b>Results:</b> The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed distinct patterns of association between EEG oscillations and clinical variables. Delta oscillations were inversely associated with cognitive scores (OR: 0.69; <i>p</i> = 0.048), while higher delta power was related to the absence of PLS (OR: 58.55; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Frontal alpha power was positively linked to cognitive function (OR: 1.55; <i>p</i> = 0.02) but negatively associated with functional independence (OR: 0.75; <i>p</i> = 0.04). <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings suggest that lower frequencies, such as delta oscillations, play a role as potential compensatory brain rhythms. In contrast, alpha oscillations may reflect a more adapted pattern of brain reorganization after amputation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19130,"journal":{"name":"Neurology International","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11858193/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint17020021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neuroplasticity, involving cortical and subcortical reorganization, plays a critical role in the adaptation and compensation process post-amputation. However, underlying neurophysiological changes remain unclear, particularly in brain oscillations. Methods: This is a cross-sectional analysis that includes baseline data from 48 individuals with lower limb amputation from our DEFINE Cohort Study project. EEG data were collected using a 64-channel system during a 5-min resting-state period. Preprocessed data were analyzed for delta and alpha oscillations across frontal, central, and parietal regions. Logistic regression models examined associations between EEG oscillations and clinical variables, including cognition (MoCA), functional independence (FIM), and phantom limb sensations (PLS). Results: The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed distinct patterns of association between EEG oscillations and clinical variables. Delta oscillations were inversely associated with cognitive scores (OR: 0.69; p = 0.048), while higher delta power was related to the absence of PLS (OR: 58.55; p < 0.01). Frontal alpha power was positively linked to cognitive function (OR: 1.55; p = 0.02) but negatively associated with functional independence (OR: 0.75; p = 0.04). Conclusions: These findings suggest that lower frequencies, such as delta oscillations, play a role as potential compensatory brain rhythms. In contrast, alpha oscillations may reflect a more adapted pattern of brain reorganization after amputation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下肢截肢后适应和代偿的神经生理标志物:来自DEFINE队列研究的脑电图振荡和临床预测因子分析
背景:包括皮层和皮层下重组在内的神经可塑性在截肢后的适应和补偿过程中起着关键作用。然而,潜在的神经生理变化仍不清楚,特别是在脑振荡方面。方法:这是一项横断面分析,包括来自DEFINE队列研究项目的48例下肢截肢患者的基线数据。在5分钟静息期,采用64通道系统采集脑电数据。分析了前额、中央和顶叶区域的δ和α振荡的预处理数据。逻辑回归模型检验了脑电图振荡与临床变量之间的关系,包括认知(MoCA)、功能独立性(FIM)和幻肢感觉(PLS)。结果:多因素logistic回归分析显示脑电图振荡与临床变量之间存在明显的关联模式。δ振荡与认知得分呈负相关(OR: 0.69;p = 0.048),而较高的δ幂与不存在PLS相关(OR: 58.55;P < 0.01)。额叶α能量与认知功能呈正相关(OR: 1.55;p = 0.02),但与功能独立性呈负相关(OR: 0.75;P = 0.04)。结论:这些发现表明,较低的频率,如δ振荡,作为潜在的代偿性脑节律发挥作用。相比之下,α振荡可能反映了截肢后更适应的大脑重组模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology International
Neurology International CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cognition and Health-Related Quality of Life After aSAH: The Role of Objective and Subjective Impairment. Posterior Communicating Artery Configuration and Laterality of Thalamic and Lenticulostriate Infarction. Duropathies as Unifying Concept-Part Two: A Narrative Overview of Clinical and Neuroradiological Features. No New Relevant Treatment Options for L-DOPA-Induced Dyskinesia from a Clinician's Point of View. Delta Power in SLC6A1-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder: Operationalizing Quantitative EEG Metrics for Biomarker Development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1