Relative Efficacy, Effectiveness and Safety of Newer and/or Enhanced Seasonal Influenza Vaccines for the Prevention of Laboratory-Confirmed Influenza in Individuals Aged 18 years and Over: Update of a Systematic Review.

IF 9 2区 医学 Q1 VIROLOGY Reviews in Medical Virology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1002/rmv.70020
Mona Askar, Karam Adel Ali, Madeleine Batke, Timo Brugger, Annika Falman, Anna Hayman Robertson, Jaime Jesús Pérez, Kari Johansen, Jorgen de Jonge, Tyra Grove Krause, Wiebe Külper-Schiek, Joerg J Meerpohl, Angeliki Melidou, Hanna Nohynek, Carmen Olmedo, Kate Olsson, Ioanna Pavlopoulou, Vanessa Piechotta, Johanna Rubin, Johanna Schlaberg, Christine Schmucker, Waldemar Siemens, Jan Stratil, Veronika Učakar, Ole Wichmann, Thomas Harder
{"title":"Relative Efficacy, Effectiveness and Safety of Newer and/or Enhanced Seasonal Influenza Vaccines for the Prevention of Laboratory-Confirmed Influenza in Individuals Aged 18 years and Over: Update of a Systematic Review.","authors":"Mona Askar, Karam Adel Ali, Madeleine Batke, Timo Brugger, Annika Falman, Anna Hayman Robertson, Jaime Jesús Pérez, Kari Johansen, Jorgen de Jonge, Tyra Grove Krause, Wiebe Külper-Schiek, Joerg J Meerpohl, Angeliki Melidou, Hanna Nohynek, Carmen Olmedo, Kate Olsson, Ioanna Pavlopoulou, Vanessa Piechotta, Johanna Rubin, Johanna Schlaberg, Christine Schmucker, Waldemar Siemens, Jan Stratil, Veronika Učakar, Ole Wichmann, Thomas Harder","doi":"10.1002/rmv.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We performed an update (last search: 24 July 2023) of a systematic review on relative efficacy/effectiveness (rVE) and safety of newer/enhanced seasonal influenza vaccines in comparison with standard influenza vaccine or in head-to-head comparison. Eligible studies investigated adults aged ≥ 18 years, analysed the MF59-adjuvanted or high-dose or cell-based or recombinant or mRNA-based influenza vaccine and reported rVE or safety in randomised controlled trials (RCT) or non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSI). Of 1561 new entries identified, 17 studies were included. Together with 42 studies identified in the previous primary review they added up to 59 studies, all comparing newer/enhanced with standard seasonal influenza vaccines. Relative VE against laboratory-confirmed influenza was -30% (95%CI: -146% to 31%) to 88% (51%-100%; 7 NRSI) for the MF59-adjuvanted vaccine (low certainty of evidence, CoE); 24.2% (9.7%-36.5%; 1 RCT) and -9% (-158% to 54%) to 19% (-27% to 48%; 1 NRSI) for the high-dose vaccine (moderate CoE); -5.8% (-36.1% to 17.7%) to 21.4% (-7.3% to 42.4%; 2 NRSI) for the cell-based vaccine (low CoE); 30% (10%-47%; 1 RCT) and 3% (-31% to 28%) to 19% (-27% to 48%; 1 NRSI) for the recombinant vaccine (moderate CoE), respectively. Relative VE against laboratory-confirmed influenza-related hospitalisation was 59.2% (14.6%-80.5%; 1 NRSI) for the MF59-adjuvanted (moderate CoE); 27% (-1 to 48%; 1 NRSI) for the high-dose (low CoE); 8.5% (-75.9% to 52.3%; 1 NRSI) for the cell-based (low CoE); -7.3% (-52.1% to 24.4%) to 16.3% (-8.7% to 35.5%; 1 RCT) for the recombinant vaccine. No increased risk of serious adverse events was detected for any vaccine (12 RCT, 7 NRSI; low CoE). While all have a favourable safety profile, evidence on rVE of newer/enhanced vaccines is still limited, warranting further studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21180,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Medical Virology","volume":"35 2","pages":"e70020"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11850296/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Medical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.70020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We performed an update (last search: 24 July 2023) of a systematic review on relative efficacy/effectiveness (rVE) and safety of newer/enhanced seasonal influenza vaccines in comparison with standard influenza vaccine or in head-to-head comparison. Eligible studies investigated adults aged ≥ 18 years, analysed the MF59-adjuvanted or high-dose or cell-based or recombinant or mRNA-based influenza vaccine and reported rVE or safety in randomised controlled trials (RCT) or non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSI). Of 1561 new entries identified, 17 studies were included. Together with 42 studies identified in the previous primary review they added up to 59 studies, all comparing newer/enhanced with standard seasonal influenza vaccines. Relative VE against laboratory-confirmed influenza was -30% (95%CI: -146% to 31%) to 88% (51%-100%; 7 NRSI) for the MF59-adjuvanted vaccine (low certainty of evidence, CoE); 24.2% (9.7%-36.5%; 1 RCT) and -9% (-158% to 54%) to 19% (-27% to 48%; 1 NRSI) for the high-dose vaccine (moderate CoE); -5.8% (-36.1% to 17.7%) to 21.4% (-7.3% to 42.4%; 2 NRSI) for the cell-based vaccine (low CoE); 30% (10%-47%; 1 RCT) and 3% (-31% to 28%) to 19% (-27% to 48%; 1 NRSI) for the recombinant vaccine (moderate CoE), respectively. Relative VE against laboratory-confirmed influenza-related hospitalisation was 59.2% (14.6%-80.5%; 1 NRSI) for the MF59-adjuvanted (moderate CoE); 27% (-1 to 48%; 1 NRSI) for the high-dose (low CoE); 8.5% (-75.9% to 52.3%; 1 NRSI) for the cell-based (low CoE); -7.3% (-52.1% to 24.4%) to 16.3% (-8.7% to 35.5%; 1 RCT) for the recombinant vaccine. No increased risk of serious adverse events was detected for any vaccine (12 RCT, 7 NRSI; low CoE). While all have a favourable safety profile, evidence on rVE of newer/enhanced vaccines is still limited, warranting further studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in Medical Virology
Reviews in Medical Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
0.90%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Reviews in Medical Virology aims to provide articles reviewing conceptual or technological advances in diverse areas of virology. The journal covers topics such as molecular biology, cell biology, replication, pathogenesis, immunology, immunization, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment of viruses of medical importance, and COVID-19 research. The journal has an Impact Factor of 6.989 for the year 2020. The readership of the journal includes clinicians, virologists, medical microbiologists, molecular biologists, infectious disease specialists, and immunologists. Reviews in Medical Virology is indexed and abstracted in databases such as CABI, Abstracts in Anthropology, ProQuest, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, ProQuest Central K-494, SCOPUS, and Web of Science et,al.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Manifestation of Arboviruses in Paediatrics. Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cells Signalling and Viral Pathogens: A Dynamic Cross-Talk. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Long-COVID-Markers of Protection or Elevated Risk? A Systematic Review. Novel Human Polyomaviruses Discovered From 2007 to the Present: An Update of Current Knowledge. Rethinking Paediatric Respiratory Infections: The Role of Mixed Pathogen Infections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1