Athanasios Pitis, Maria Diamantopoulou, Aspasia Panagiotou, Dimitrios Papageorgiou, Foteini Tzavella
{"title":"Financial Toxicity and Its Association with the Quality of Life of Greek Patients with Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Athanasios Pitis, Maria Diamantopoulou, Aspasia Panagiotou, Dimitrios Papageorgiou, Foteini Tzavella","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15020067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Greek cancer patients deal with high out-of-pocket medical expenses in comparison with the European Union average. All these high costs affect the quality of life of cancer patients, leading to financial toxicity. The purpose of this study is to investigate the association between financial toxicity and quality of life in patients undergoing cancer treatment. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional study was conducted in four hospitals in Greece. The Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) Scale was used for the evaluation of financial toxicity, and the EORTC Core Quality of Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) was used for the assessment of quality of life. Quantitative variables were first tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov criterion. Spearman correlation coefficients (rho) were used to explore the association of two continuous variables. Multiple linear regression analysis was used with dependent the QoL subscales. Logarithmic transformations of the QoL scales were used for the regression analyses. Internal consistency reliability was determined by the calculation of Cronbach's α coefficient. All reported <i>p</i> values are two-tailed. Statistical significance was set at <i>p</i> < 0.05 and analyses were conducted using SPSS statistical software (version 27.0). <b>Results</b>: Greater financial toxicity score, i.e., lower toxicity, was significantly associated with greater global health status (rho = 0.34; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and greater physical (rho = 0.37; <i>p</i> < 0.001), role (rho = 0.17; <i>p</i> = 0.001), emotional (rho = 0.34; <i>p</i> < 0.001), cognitive (rho = 0.22; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and social (rho = 0.27; <i>p</i> < 0.001) functioning. <b>Conclusions</b>: There is a strong correlation between a greater financial toxicity score and the quality of life of Greek cancer patients, meaning the lower their financial toxicity, the better their quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11858100/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15020067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Greek cancer patients deal with high out-of-pocket medical expenses in comparison with the European Union average. All these high costs affect the quality of life of cancer patients, leading to financial toxicity. The purpose of this study is to investigate the association between financial toxicity and quality of life in patients undergoing cancer treatment. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in four hospitals in Greece. The Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) Scale was used for the evaluation of financial toxicity, and the EORTC Core Quality of Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) was used for the assessment of quality of life. Quantitative variables were first tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov criterion. Spearman correlation coefficients (rho) were used to explore the association of two continuous variables. Multiple linear regression analysis was used with dependent the QoL subscales. Logarithmic transformations of the QoL scales were used for the regression analyses. Internal consistency reliability was determined by the calculation of Cronbach's α coefficient. All reported p values are two-tailed. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 and analyses were conducted using SPSS statistical software (version 27.0). Results: Greater financial toxicity score, i.e., lower toxicity, was significantly associated with greater global health status (rho = 0.34; p < 0.001) and greater physical (rho = 0.37; p < 0.001), role (rho = 0.17; p = 0.001), emotional (rho = 0.34; p < 0.001), cognitive (rho = 0.22; p < 0.001), and social (rho = 0.27; p < 0.001) functioning. Conclusions: There is a strong correlation between a greater financial toxicity score and the quality of life of Greek cancer patients, meaning the lower their financial toxicity, the better their quality of life.
期刊介绍:
Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.