Therapeutic Evaluation and Utilization Analysis of Mental Health Prescription Digital Therapeutics Within the Current Regulatory Landscape.

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy13010019
Sherry Huinan Xia, Megha Mohan Narayanan, Venkatesh Swamy, Kari Franson
{"title":"Therapeutic Evaluation and Utilization Analysis of Mental Health Prescription Digital Therapeutics Within the Current Regulatory Landscape.","authors":"Sherry Huinan Xia, Megha Mohan Narayanan, Venkatesh Swamy, Kari Franson","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy13010019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prescription digital therapeutics (PDTs) are emerging as a pivotal component of digital healthcare, providing software-based therapies for various diseases. This review aims to analyze the regulatory landscape in the U.S., safety, efficacy, and current challenges of PDTs, focusing on mental health conditions. Relevant articles were searched on PubMed, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and FDA Guidance Documents databases, supplemented by manual searches of reference lists from included studies. Inclusion criteria covered English-language studies on the development and application, therapeutic efficacy, and regulatory guidelines of PDTs in mental health. Data extraction and synthesis were conducted to summarize key findings and trends in the literature. FDA regulatory frameworks for PDTs are evolving through pathways of de novo and 510(k) applications, with patient-centric guidance. Clinical trials and real-world data support PDTs' safety and efficacy, while highlighting regulatory needs. Challenges include payer coverage, patient accessibility, and data privacy concerns. Mixed patient feedback reveals areas for improvement. Limited healthcare provider engagement and payer coverage contributed to financial challenges for PDT manufacturers. Future trends suggest that PDTs will expand beyond mental health. The evolving landscape underscores the need for continued research, regulatory refinement, and collaborative efforts across stakeholders to ensure the successful integration of PDTs into healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11859848/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13010019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prescription digital therapeutics (PDTs) are emerging as a pivotal component of digital healthcare, providing software-based therapies for various diseases. This review aims to analyze the regulatory landscape in the U.S., safety, efficacy, and current challenges of PDTs, focusing on mental health conditions. Relevant articles were searched on PubMed, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and FDA Guidance Documents databases, supplemented by manual searches of reference lists from included studies. Inclusion criteria covered English-language studies on the development and application, therapeutic efficacy, and regulatory guidelines of PDTs in mental health. Data extraction and synthesis were conducted to summarize key findings and trends in the literature. FDA regulatory frameworks for PDTs are evolving through pathways of de novo and 510(k) applications, with patient-centric guidance. Clinical trials and real-world data support PDTs' safety and efficacy, while highlighting regulatory needs. Challenges include payer coverage, patient accessibility, and data privacy concerns. Mixed patient feedback reveals areas for improvement. Limited healthcare provider engagement and payer coverage contributed to financial challenges for PDT manufacturers. Future trends suggest that PDTs will expand beyond mental health. The evolving landscape underscores the need for continued research, regulatory refinement, and collaborative efforts across stakeholders to ensure the successful integration of PDTs into healthcare.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当前监管环境下心理健康处方数字疗法的治疗评估和利用分析。
处方数字疗法(pdt)正在成为数字医疗保健的关键组成部分,为各种疾病提供基于软件的治疗。本综述旨在分析美国的监管现状、pdt的安全性、有效性和当前挑战,重点关注心理健康状况。相关文章在PubMed、b谷歌Scholar、ClinicalTrials.gov和FDA指导文件数据库中检索,并辅以人工检索纳入研究的参考文献列表。纳入标准包括关于精神健康中PDTs的发展和应用、治疗效果和管理指南的英语研究。进行数据提取和综合,以总结文献中的主要发现和趋势。FDA对pdt的监管框架正在以患者为中心的指导下,通过从头开始和510(k)申请的途径不断发展。临床试验和实际数据支持pdt的安全性和有效性,同时强调了监管需求。挑战包括付款人覆盖范围、患者可及性和数据隐私问题。病人的反馈好坏参半,显示出需要改进的地方。有限的医疗保健提供者参与和付款人覆盖范围导致了PDT制造商面临的财务挑战。未来的趋势表明,pdt将扩展到精神健康以外的领域。不断变化的环境强调了继续研究、完善监管和跨利益相关者的协作努力的必要性,以确保将pdt成功集成到医疗保健中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Potential Exposure to Pregnancy-Contraindicated Medications Among Women of Reproductive Age in Japan: A Retrospective Database Study. Global Pharmaceutical Regulation: Comparative Frameworks and Operations. Drug-Induced Hyponatremia as a Cause of Emergency Department Attendance. Real-World Comparison of Intravenous vs. Oral Antimicrobial Therapy for Bone and Joint Infections. Older Adults' Access to Pharmacological Treatment, a Human Right to Health: Scoping Review (2020-2025).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1