Nursing Students' Perceptions and Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Education.

IF 2 Q1 NURSING Nursing Reports Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.3390/nursrep15020068
ShinHi Han, Hee Sun Kang, Philip Gimber, Sunghyun Lim
{"title":"Nursing Students' Perceptions and Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Education.","authors":"ShinHi Han, Hee Sun Kang, Philip Gimber, Sunghyun Lim","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15020068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming nursing, with generative AI (GenAI) tools such as ChatGPT offering opportunities to enhance education through personalized learning pathways. This study aimed to explore nursing students' use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and their perceptions of its use in nursing education, including its advantages, disadvantages, and perceived support needs. <b>Methods:</b> This study employed an online survey. The participants were 99 undergraduate nursing students in New York City. Data was collected online through self-report measures using semi-structured, open-ended questions. The data was analyzed using content analysis. <b>Results:</b> Most participants (92%) used GenAI tools to access accurate information, clarify nursing concepts, and support clinical tasks such as diagnoses and health assessments, as well as schoolwork, grammar checks, and health promotion. They valued GenAI as a quick, accessible resource that simplified complex information and supported learning through definitions, practice questions, and writing improvements. However, the participants noted drawbacks, such as subscription costs, over-reliance, information overload, and accuracy issues, leading to trust concerns. The participants suggested financial support, early guidance, and instructional modules to better integrate AI into nursing education. <b>Conclusions:</b> The results indicate that GenAI positively impacts nursing education and highlight the need for guidelines on critical evaluation. To integrate GenAI effectively, educators should consider introductory sessions, support programs, and a GenAI-friendly environment, promoting responsible AI use and preparing students for its application in nursing education.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11858139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15020068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming nursing, with generative AI (GenAI) tools such as ChatGPT offering opportunities to enhance education through personalized learning pathways. This study aimed to explore nursing students' use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and their perceptions of its use in nursing education, including its advantages, disadvantages, and perceived support needs. Methods: This study employed an online survey. The participants were 99 undergraduate nursing students in New York City. Data was collected online through self-report measures using semi-structured, open-ended questions. The data was analyzed using content analysis. Results: Most participants (92%) used GenAI tools to access accurate information, clarify nursing concepts, and support clinical tasks such as diagnoses and health assessments, as well as schoolwork, grammar checks, and health promotion. They valued GenAI as a quick, accessible resource that simplified complex information and supported learning through definitions, practice questions, and writing improvements. However, the participants noted drawbacks, such as subscription costs, over-reliance, information overload, and accuracy issues, leading to trust concerns. The participants suggested financial support, early guidance, and instructional modules to better integrate AI into nursing education. Conclusions: The results indicate that GenAI positively impacts nursing education and highlight the need for guidelines on critical evaluation. To integrate GenAI effectively, educators should consider introductory sessions, support programs, and a GenAI-friendly environment, promoting responsible AI use and preparing students for its application in nursing education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护生对生成性人工智能的认知及在护理教育中的应用。
背景/目标:人工智能(AI)正在改变护理,ChatGPT等生成式人工智能(GenAI)工具提供了通过个性化学习途径加强教育的机会。本研究旨在探讨护生对生成式人工智能(GenAI)的使用情况,以及他们对其在护理教育中使用的看法,包括其优势、劣势和感知到的支持需求。方法:本研究采用在线调查。参与者是纽约市99名本科护理专业的学生。数据是通过使用半结构化开放式问题的自我报告方法在线收集的。采用内容分析法对数据进行分析。结果:大多数参与者(92%)使用GenAI工具获取准确的信息,澄清护理概念,并支持临床任务,如诊断和健康评估,以及学校作业,语法检查和健康促进。他们认为GenAI是一种快速、可访问的资源,它简化了复杂的信息,并通过定义、练习题和写作改进来支持学习。然而,参与者指出了一些缺点,如订阅成本、过度依赖、信息过载和准确性问题,导致了信任问题。与会者建议提供资金支持、早期指导和教学模块,以更好地将人工智能融入护理教育。结论:研究结果表明GenAI对护理教育有积极的影响,并强调了制定批判性评估指南的必要性。为了有效地整合GenAI,教育工作者应该考虑介绍性会议、支持计划和对GenAI友好的环境,促进负责任的人工智能使用,并为学生在护理教育中的应用做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Symptom Clusters and Related Factors of Late Toxicities in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors After Radiation Therapy: A Cross-Sectional Study. Secondary Traumatic Stress Among Emergency Medical Personnel: A Cross-Sectional Study in Romania. Nurses' Perspectives on the Non-Pharmacological Management of Oral Mucositis in Onco-Hematological Care: A Qualitative Content Analysis. Psychosocial Workplace Environments Enabling Sustainable Employment for People with Mental Health Conditions: A Scoping Review. How Do Culturally and Racially Marginalised (CaRM) Populations in Australia Cope with the Mental Health Impacts from "New Racism"? A Qualitative Descriptive Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1