Development and Implementation of an Ultrasound Wireless Technology Educational Program for Nursing Students: A Quality Improvement Project.

IF 2 Q1 NURSING Nursing Reports Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.3390/nursrep15020063
Elena Morotti, Sergio Rovesti, Chiara Diambri, Davide Boni, Rosaria Di Lorenzo, Dalia Caleffi, Mauro Bellifemine, Paola Ferri
{"title":"Development and Implementation of an Ultrasound Wireless Technology Educational Program for Nursing Students: A Quality Improvement Project.","authors":"Elena Morotti, Sergio Rovesti, Chiara Diambri, Davide Boni, Rosaria Di Lorenzo, Dalia Caleffi, Mauro Bellifemine, Paola Ferri","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15020063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Training on the use of ultrasounds (US) is offered to nurses after their degree in specialization courses or in a work setting. When considering the positive impact of US on patient quality of care, this training should be offered to undergraduate nursing students. The aim of this quality improvement project was to assess the quality of nursing curricula by evaluating the effects of an ultrasound technology educational program (USTep) on nursing students' knowledge, self-confidence, satisfaction and perceived usefulness of the training for the acquisition of US skills. <b>Methods</b>: 118 nursing students completed a 3-h USTep, that combined a theoretical introduction with simulation training. Data were collected before and after the USTep, using a survey with closed and open-ended questions. <b>Results</b>: After the educational program, a net increase was seen in knowledge about US (pre-test 48.1% vs. post-test 93.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.00001) and in student self-confidence (pre-test m = 1.7 ± 0.9 vs. post-test m = 3.9 ± 0.8, <i>p</i> < 0.001). According to the participants, this training benefited the students (during their training and for future employment opportunities), the patients, and the profession. Lastly, 97% of the sample expressed satisfaction with the training experience. <b>Conclusions</b>: This quality improvement project shows that a 3-h USTep improved undergraduate nursing students' knowledge, self-confidence, and satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11857979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15020063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Training on the use of ultrasounds (US) is offered to nurses after their degree in specialization courses or in a work setting. When considering the positive impact of US on patient quality of care, this training should be offered to undergraduate nursing students. The aim of this quality improvement project was to assess the quality of nursing curricula by evaluating the effects of an ultrasound technology educational program (USTep) on nursing students' knowledge, self-confidence, satisfaction and perceived usefulness of the training for the acquisition of US skills. Methods: 118 nursing students completed a 3-h USTep, that combined a theoretical introduction with simulation training. Data were collected before and after the USTep, using a survey with closed and open-ended questions. Results: After the educational program, a net increase was seen in knowledge about US (pre-test 48.1% vs. post-test 93.4%, p < 0.00001) and in student self-confidence (pre-test m = 1.7 ± 0.9 vs. post-test m = 3.9 ± 0.8, p < 0.001). According to the participants, this training benefited the students (during their training and for future employment opportunities), the patients, and the profession. Lastly, 97% of the sample expressed satisfaction with the training experience. Conclusions: This quality improvement project shows that a 3-h USTep improved undergraduate nursing students' knowledge, self-confidence, and satisfaction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理学生超声无线技术教育计划之发展与实施:品质提升计画。
背景:在专业课程或工作环境中获得学位后,为护士提供使用超声波(美国)的培训。考虑到US对患者护理质量的积极影响,应该对本科护理学生进行这种培训。本研究旨在通过评估超声技术教育计划(USTep)对护理学生的知识、自信、满意度和获得美国技能培训的感知有用性的影响,来评估护理课程的质量。方法:118名护生完成3小时的USTep,理论介绍与模拟训练相结合。数据是在USTep之前和之后收集的,采用封闭式和开放式问题调查。结果:教育项目后,学生对美国知识的净增加(测试前48.1%比测试后93.4%,p < 0.00001)和自信(测试前m = 1.7±0.9比测试后m = 3.9±0.8,p < 0.001)。根据参与者的说法,这种培训对学生(在培训期间和未来的就业机会)、患者和专业都有好处。最后,97%的样本对培训体验表示满意。结论:3 h的USTep提高了本科护生的知识水平、自信心和满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Symptom Clusters and Related Factors of Late Toxicities in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors After Radiation Therapy: A Cross-Sectional Study. Secondary Traumatic Stress Among Emergency Medical Personnel: A Cross-Sectional Study in Romania. Nurses' Perspectives on the Non-Pharmacological Management of Oral Mucositis in Onco-Hematological Care: A Qualitative Content Analysis. Psychosocial Workplace Environments Enabling Sustainable Employment for People with Mental Health Conditions: A Scoping Review. How Do Culturally and Racially Marginalised (CaRM) Populations in Australia Cope with the Mental Health Impacts from "New Racism"? A Qualitative Descriptive Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1