Maternal Birth Weight From Maternal and Child Health Handbooks Predicts LGA Neonates Better Than Maternal Parameters in Pregnancy.

IF 3.2 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Pregnancy Pub Date : 2025-02-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/jp/4500495
Kaname Dateoka, Suguru Mabuchi, Yuiko Nagamine, Takanari Arai, Masayoshi Hashimoto
{"title":"Maternal Birth Weight From <i>Maternal and Child Health Handbooks</i> Predicts LGA Neonates Better Than Maternal Parameters in Pregnancy.","authors":"Kaname Dateoka, Suguru Mabuchi, Yuiko Nagamine, Takanari Arai, Masayoshi Hashimoto","doi":"10.1155/jp/4500495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study is aimed at evaluating maternal birth weight, recorded in Japan's <i>Maternal and Child Health Handbooks</i>, as a predictor for large for gestational age (LGA) neonates compared to traditional pregnancy factors. <b>Methods:</b> In this retrospective study, we analyzed maternal and neonatal data from 374 singleton, full-term pregnancies at Keiju General Hospital (2017-2020). Maternal birth weight was obtained from Japan's Maternal Child Health Handbooks, and fasting plasma glucose was measured during the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Logistic regression models assessed the predictive contributions of maternal birth weight and fasting plasma glucose, adjusted for maternal and pregnancy factors. <b>Results:</b> Among 374 patients, 9.8% of neonates were classified as LGA. This group had a higher proportion of a family history of diabetes (<i>p</i> = 0.04) and greater maternal height (<i>p</i> = 0.01), pre-pregnancy weight (<i>p</i> = 0.004), weight before delivery (<i>p</i> = 0.03), and maternal birth weight (<i>p</i> = 0.001) than the non-LGA group. Multivariate analysis showed that maternal birth weight remained a significant predictor of neonatal birth weight after adjusting for other risk factors (odds ratios: 2.92 for maternal birth weight between 3500 and 3999 g and 4.77 for birth weight ≥ 4000 g). <b>Conclusion:</b> This study suggests the potential of incorporating maternal birth weight to improve LGA risk prediction. These findings provide foundational data for further research into the integration of maternal birth weight in risk assessment models and its potential clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":47062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pregnancy","volume":"2025 ","pages":"4500495"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11847610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pregnancy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/jp/4500495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study is aimed at evaluating maternal birth weight, recorded in Japan's Maternal and Child Health Handbooks, as a predictor for large for gestational age (LGA) neonates compared to traditional pregnancy factors. Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed maternal and neonatal data from 374 singleton, full-term pregnancies at Keiju General Hospital (2017-2020). Maternal birth weight was obtained from Japan's Maternal Child Health Handbooks, and fasting plasma glucose was measured during the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Logistic regression models assessed the predictive contributions of maternal birth weight and fasting plasma glucose, adjusted for maternal and pregnancy factors. Results: Among 374 patients, 9.8% of neonates were classified as LGA. This group had a higher proportion of a family history of diabetes (p = 0.04) and greater maternal height (p = 0.01), pre-pregnancy weight (p = 0.004), weight before delivery (p = 0.03), and maternal birth weight (p = 0.001) than the non-LGA group. Multivariate analysis showed that maternal birth weight remained a significant predictor of neonatal birth weight after adjusting for other risk factors (odds ratios: 2.92 for maternal birth weight between 3500 and 3999 g and 4.77 for birth weight ≥ 4000 g). Conclusion: This study suggests the potential of incorporating maternal birth weight to improve LGA risk prediction. These findings provide foundational data for further research into the integration of maternal birth weight in risk assessment models and its potential clinical applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pregnancy
Journal of Pregnancy OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pregnancy is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on breastfeeding, labor, maternal health and the biomedical aspects of pregnancy.
期刊最新文献
Maternal Birth Weight From Maternal and Child Health Handbooks Predicts LGA Neonates Better Than Maternal Parameters in Pregnancy. The Effect of Preinduction Cervical Ripening With Synthetic Hygroscopic Dilators on Maternal Outcomes of Women With Previous Caesarean Pregnancy: A Single-Group Clinical Trial. Low-Dose Prophylactic Oral Iron Supplementation (Ferrous Fumarate, Ferrous Bisglycinate, and Ferrous Sulphate) in Pregnancy Is Not Associated With Clinically Significant Gastrointestinal Complaints: Results From Two Randomized Studies. Magnitude and Associated Factors of Herbal Medicine Use During Pregnancy Among Women Attending Antenatal Care in Public Health Institutions of Central Tigray, Northern Ethiopia (2020): Facility-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Prevalence and Factors Associated With Abnormal Cerebroplacental Ratio Among Women With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy at a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Southwestern Uganda.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1