Reliability of a Standardized Ultrasound Protocol for the Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ACOUSTICS Ultraschall in Der Medizin Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1055/a-2532-4823
Emilia Stegemann, Jana Larbig, Irene Portig, Nadine Weiske, Thomas Bürger, Berthold Stegemann
{"title":"Reliability of a Standardized Ultrasound Protocol for the Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.","authors":"Emilia Stegemann, Jana Larbig, Irene Portig, Nadine Weiske, Thomas Bürger, Berthold Stegemann","doi":"10.1055/a-2532-4823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Arterial thoracic outlet syndrome (aTOS) is a rare condition, but if undiagnosed, it can have serious consequences for affected patients, up to and including limb loss. Ultrasound could be used here as a widely available method for screening, but it is said to have very high investigator dependence. The fact that ultrasound can be used safely for diagnostic purposes has already been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the repeatability of a standardized examination for the diagnosis of aTOS.We recruited inpatients with high-grade suspected arterial thoracic outlet syndrome who were evaluated for invasive therapy at our TOS center. Routine diagnostics were performed according to clinic standards. In addition, 2 sonographers, one highly experienced and one less experienced, performed ultrasound diagnosis according to a standardized protocol. Image acquisition and interpretation were performed independently, and sonographers were mutually blinded. For analysis, the experienced sonographer served as a reference. Agreement between assessors was analyzed using concordance analysis.51 consecutive patients (67% female) aged 39.3±13.0 years were included within 11 months. The standardized ultrasound protocol could be performed in all patients. The prevalence of TOS was high (79.4%; CI: 71.4-87.3%) in our cohort. Ultrasound inter-rater agreement using the standardized protocol was very good at 0.820 (CI: 0.624-1.000).Ultrasound diagnosis of TOS using a standardized protocol can be performed effectively and shows a high agreement between 2 sonographers.</p>","PeriodicalId":49400,"journal":{"name":"Ultraschall in Der Medizin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultraschall in Der Medizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2532-4823","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Arterial thoracic outlet syndrome (aTOS) is a rare condition, but if undiagnosed, it can have serious consequences for affected patients, up to and including limb loss. Ultrasound could be used here as a widely available method for screening, but it is said to have very high investigator dependence. The fact that ultrasound can be used safely for diagnostic purposes has already been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the repeatability of a standardized examination for the diagnosis of aTOS.We recruited inpatients with high-grade suspected arterial thoracic outlet syndrome who were evaluated for invasive therapy at our TOS center. Routine diagnostics were performed according to clinic standards. In addition, 2 sonographers, one highly experienced and one less experienced, performed ultrasound diagnosis according to a standardized protocol. Image acquisition and interpretation were performed independently, and sonographers were mutually blinded. For analysis, the experienced sonographer served as a reference. Agreement between assessors was analyzed using concordance analysis.51 consecutive patients (67% female) aged 39.3±13.0 years were included within 11 months. The standardized ultrasound protocol could be performed in all patients. The prevalence of TOS was high (79.4%; CI: 71.4-87.3%) in our cohort. Ultrasound inter-rater agreement using the standardized protocol was very good at 0.820 (CI: 0.624-1.000).Ultrasound diagnosis of TOS using a standardized protocol can be performed effectively and shows a high agreement between 2 sonographers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ultraschall in Der Medizin
Ultraschall in Der Medizin 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultraschall in der Medizin / European Journal of Ultrasound publishes scientific papers and contributions from a variety of disciplines on the diagnostic and therapeutic applications of ultrasound with an emphasis on clinical application. Technical papers with a physiological theme as well as the interaction between ultrasound and biological systems might also occasionally be considered for peer review and publication, provided that the translational relevance is high and the link with clinical applications is tight. The editors and the publishers reserve the right to publish selected articles online only. Authors are welcome to submit supplementary video material. Letters and comments are also accepted, promoting a vivid exchange of opinions and scientific discussions.
期刊最新文献
2D Shear Wave Elastography Increases Diagnostic Accuracy of the TIRADS-ACR and ATA Classification System in Thyroid Nodule Selection: Cyto- and Histological Correlation. Standardized measurement of the piriformis muscle and the proximal portion of the sacral nerve roots using transvaginal ultrasound. Perfusion based malignancy assessment of soft tissue tumors by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): a comprehensive analysis of 187 cases. Imaging the fetal aortic arch and its branching pattern in a midtrimester screening population. Reliability of a Standardized Ultrasound Protocol for the Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1