Lying to your doctor: Exploring age differences and techniques to foster honest patient-doctor communication.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Health Psychology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1177/13591053251321775
Alison M O'Connor, Jessica C Frias
{"title":"Lying to your doctor: Exploring age differences and techniques to foster honest patient-doctor communication.","authors":"Alison M O'Connor, Jessica C Frias","doi":"10.1177/13591053251321775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Honest communication between patients and doctors is essential for providing quality healthcare. The present study tested a sample of 158 younger and 149 older adults and assessed how often they lied to their doctor about their health behaviors (exercise, food/diet, alcohol use, illicit drug use, cigarette smoking). We also assessed perceptions of two communication strategies where patients reported their health concerns verbally to their doctor (direct communication) or by writing down their concerns before seeing the doctor (indirect communication). Lying to one's doctor was common across adults, but younger adults were more likely to lie about drug use and cigarette smoking compared with older adults. Younger adults also showed a stronger preference for indirect communication and reported that this communication method would make them more honest with their doctor during a routine check-up. These results offer insight into enhancing honesty between patients and doctors.</p>","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"3628-3640"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12534874/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053251321775","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Honest communication between patients and doctors is essential for providing quality healthcare. The present study tested a sample of 158 younger and 149 older adults and assessed how often they lied to their doctor about their health behaviors (exercise, food/diet, alcohol use, illicit drug use, cigarette smoking). We also assessed perceptions of two communication strategies where patients reported their health concerns verbally to their doctor (direct communication) or by writing down their concerns before seeing the doctor (indirect communication). Lying to one's doctor was common across adults, but younger adults were more likely to lie about drug use and cigarette smoking compared with older adults. Younger adults also showed a stronger preference for indirect communication and reported that this communication method would make them more honest with their doctor during a routine check-up. These results offer insight into enhancing honesty between patients and doctors.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对你的医生撒谎:探索年龄差异和技巧来促进诚实的医患沟通。
患者与医生之间的真诚沟通对于提供高质量的医疗服务至关重要。本研究对 158 名年轻人和 149 名老年人进行了抽样测试,评估了他们在健康行为(运动、食物/饮食、饮酒、使用违禁药物、吸烟)方面向医生撒谎的频率。我们还评估了患者对两种沟通策略的看法,即向医生口头报告自己的健康问题(直接沟通)或在看病前写下自己的健康问题(间接沟通)。向医生撒谎在成年人中很常见,但与老年人相比,年轻人更有可能在吸毒和吸烟问题上撒谎。年轻人也更倾向于间接沟通,并表示这种沟通方式会让他们在例行体检时对医生更加诚实。这些结果为加强病人和医生之间的诚实提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Psychology
Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
期刊最新文献
Scheduling self-efficacy surpasses motivational constructs in explaining physical activity adherence in non-Hispanic Black men. Assessing psychological trauma levels and contributory factors among pregnant women following seismic events. The effect of perceived birth trauma in women with planned cesarean section on maternal and paternal attachment: Path analysis model. The relationships between perceived social support, psychological well-being and acceptance-rejection levels toward their children in parents with multiple sclerosis: A conditional process model. Relationship of sleep quality, BMI, Dietary, and socioeconomic attributes among young adults: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1