Technical, Tactical, and Time-Motion Match Profiles of the Forwards, Midfielders, and Defenders of a Men's Football Serie A Team.

IF 2.2 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.3390/sports13020028
Rocco Perrotta, Alexandru Nicolae Ungureanu, Domenico Cherubini, Paolo Riccardo Brustio, Corrado Lupo
{"title":"Technical, Tactical, and Time-Motion Match Profiles of the Forwards, Midfielders, and Defenders of a Men's Football Serie A Team.","authors":"Rocco Perrotta, Alexandru Nicolae Ungureanu, Domenico Cherubini, Paolo Riccardo Brustio, Corrado Lupo","doi":"10.3390/sports13020028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study aimed to verify the (1) differences between players' roles in relation to technical and tactical and time-motion indicators, and the (2) relationships between individual time-motion and technical and tactical indicators for each role in a men's Italian football Serie A team. A total of 227 performances were analyzed (28 players: 8 forwards, FWs; 11 midfielders, MDs; 9 defenders, DFs). Technical and tactical indicators, such as ball possession (played balls, successful passes, successful playing patterns, lost balls, ball possession time), offensive play (total and successful dribbles, crosses, assists), and shooting (total shots, shots on target) were obtained by means of Panini Digital (DigitalSoccer Project S.r.l). In addition, a time-motion analysis included the total distance, distances covered at intensities of 16.0-19.8 km/h, 19.8-25.2 km/h, and over 25.2 km/h, the average recovery time between metabolic power peaks, and burst occurrence, the latter of which was performed by means of a 18 Hz GPS device (GPexe Pro2 system tool) worn by the players. Results showed role-specific differences: MDs covered more distance, while DFs had better ball possession. MDs and DFs had more successful playing patterns, and MDs and FWs performed more dribbles and shots. Strong correlations (<i>p</i> < 0.01, ρ > 0.8) were found between bursts and assists for FWs, high-intensity running and ball possession for MDs, and distance, dribbling, and shots for DFs. These findings highlight the importance of individual and tailored training programs to optimize role-specific performance demands.</p>","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11860454/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13020028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aimed to verify the (1) differences between players' roles in relation to technical and tactical and time-motion indicators, and the (2) relationships between individual time-motion and technical and tactical indicators for each role in a men's Italian football Serie A team. A total of 227 performances were analyzed (28 players: 8 forwards, FWs; 11 midfielders, MDs; 9 defenders, DFs). Technical and tactical indicators, such as ball possession (played balls, successful passes, successful playing patterns, lost balls, ball possession time), offensive play (total and successful dribbles, crosses, assists), and shooting (total shots, shots on target) were obtained by means of Panini Digital (DigitalSoccer Project S.r.l). In addition, a time-motion analysis included the total distance, distances covered at intensities of 16.0-19.8 km/h, 19.8-25.2 km/h, and over 25.2 km/h, the average recovery time between metabolic power peaks, and burst occurrence, the latter of which was performed by means of a 18 Hz GPS device (GPexe Pro2 system tool) worn by the players. Results showed role-specific differences: MDs covered more distance, while DFs had better ball possession. MDs and DFs had more successful playing patterns, and MDs and FWs performed more dribbles and shots. Strong correlations (p < 0.01, ρ > 0.8) were found between bursts and assists for FWs, high-intensity running and ball possession for MDs, and distance, dribbling, and shots for DFs. These findings highlight the importance of individual and tailored training programs to optimize role-specific performance demands.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本研究旨在验证:(1) 意大利男子足球甲级联赛球队中不同角色球员在技战术和时间运动指标方面的差异;(2) 不同角色球员的个人时间运动指标与技战术指标之间的关系。共分析了 227 次表现(28 名球员:8 名前锋,FW;11 名中场,MD;9 名后卫,DF)。通过 Panini Digital(DigitalSoccer Project S.r.l.)获得了技术和战术指标,如控球(出球、成功传球、成功踢球方式、失球、控球时间)、进攻(总运球次数和成功运球次数、传球次数、助攻次数)和射门(总射门次数、射正次数)。此外,时间运动分析还包括总距离、16.0-19.8 公里/小时、19.8-25.2 公里/小时和超过 25.2 公里/小时的运动强度下的距离、新陈代谢功率峰值之间的平均恢复时间以及爆发发生率,后者是通过球员佩戴的 18 赫兹 GPS 设备(GPexe Pro2 系统工具)进行的。结果显示了不同角色之间的差异:MD 的覆盖距离更远,而 DF 的控球率更高。MD 和 DF 有更多成功的比赛模式,MD 和 FW 有更多的运球和射门。研究发现,FWs 的爆发和助攻、MDs 的高强度跑动和控球,以及 DFs 的距离、运球和射门之间存在很强的相关性(p < 0.01,ρ > 0.8)。这些发现凸显了个性化和定制化训练计划对于优化特定角色表现需求的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative Effects of Resistance Training Modalities on Mental Health and Quality of Life in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury. Are Perceived Effort Scales (OMNI-RES) Appropriate for Defining and Controlling Strength Training Intensity? Influence of Total Running Experience on Lower Leg Variability: Implications for Control and Performance in Male Athletes. Study of the Load During Official Competition in Professional Women's Basketball-A Case Study. The Influence of Game Intervals on Physical Performance Demands in Elite Futsal: Insights from Congested Periods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1