Are There Differences Between Sexes in Performance-Related Variables During a Maximal Intermittent Flywheel Test?

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1177/19417381251320574
Jorge Salse-Batán, Priscila Torrado, Michel Marina
{"title":"Are There Differences Between Sexes in Performance-Related Variables During a Maximal Intermittent Flywheel Test?","authors":"Jorge Salse-Batán, Priscila Torrado, Michel Marina","doi":"10.1177/19417381251320574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Isometric and dynamic tasks of low-to-moderate intensities have been used to study sex differences in fatigability; however, maximal exertions with flywheel devices (FDs) have not been used. This study aimed to (1) detect sex differences in fatigue-related performance in a maximal intermittent fatiguing protocol on a FD, and (2) investigate the most sensitive dynamometric and mechanical variables for assessing fatigue in both sexes.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>No sex differences should exist when performing this protocol on a FD.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort observational study.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 34 young adults (17 female/17 male) performed 10 sets of 10 repetitions with 3 minutes of passive recovery of a half-squat exercise on a FD. Inter- and intraset analysis of force, power, velocity, work, and impulse, together with their relative change and slope, were calculated during concentric and eccentric phases. Raw data were also normalized to body mass in the interset analysis. The relative changes in each variable were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Men showed greater and earlier decreases in performance throughout sets (<i>P</i> < .05; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.08), but these differences were not consistent after normalization for body mass (<i>P</i> > .05; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> ≤ 0.05). Irrespective of sex and phase, the intraset analysis revealed that relative change was higher in the last set (<i>P</i> ≤ .03; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.14), with power being the most sensitive variable for detecting performance decline (<i>P</i> ≤ .04; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.49).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women experienced slower and delayed fatigue kinetics than men during a maximal intermittent fatiguing protocol with FD if body dimensionality is not considered. For training purposes, power seems to be the most sensitive and discriminative variable for detecting decreases in performance.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Body dimensionality is a key factor that must be considered when comparing both sexes in FDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54276,"journal":{"name":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","volume":" ","pages":"19417381251320574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381251320574","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Isometric and dynamic tasks of low-to-moderate intensities have been used to study sex differences in fatigability; however, maximal exertions with flywheel devices (FDs) have not been used. This study aimed to (1) detect sex differences in fatigue-related performance in a maximal intermittent fatiguing protocol on a FD, and (2) investigate the most sensitive dynamometric and mechanical variables for assessing fatigue in both sexes.

Hypothesis: No sex differences should exist when performing this protocol on a FD.

Study design: Cohort observational study.

Level of evidence: Level 3.

Methods: A total of 34 young adults (17 female/17 male) performed 10 sets of 10 repetitions with 3 minutes of passive recovery of a half-squat exercise on a FD. Inter- and intraset analysis of force, power, velocity, work, and impulse, together with their relative change and slope, were calculated during concentric and eccentric phases. Raw data were also normalized to body mass in the interset analysis. The relative changes in each variable were compared.

Results: Men showed greater and earlier decreases in performance throughout sets (P < .05; ηp2 ≥ 0.08), but these differences were not consistent after normalization for body mass (P > .05; ηp2 ≤ 0.05). Irrespective of sex and phase, the intraset analysis revealed that relative change was higher in the last set (P ≤ .03; ηp2 ≥ 0.14), with power being the most sensitive variable for detecting performance decline (P ≤ .04; ηp2 = 0.49).

Conclusion: Women experienced slower and delayed fatigue kinetics than men during a maximal intermittent fatiguing protocol with FD if body dimensionality is not considered. For training purposes, power seems to be the most sensitive and discriminative variable for detecting decreases in performance.

Clinical relevance: Body dimensionality is a key factor that must be considered when comparing both sexes in FDs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:低强度至中等强度的等长和动态任务已被用于研究疲劳性的性别差异;然而,使用飞轮装置(FD)进行的最大强度运动尚未被使用过。本研究的目的是:(1)检测在飞轮装置上进行最大间歇性疲劳训练时与疲劳相关的表现的性别差异;(2)研究评估男女疲劳的最敏感的测力和机械变量:研究设计:队列观察研究:研究设计:队列观察研究:证据等级:3级:共有 34 名年轻成年人(17 名女性/17 名男性)在 FD 上进行了 10 组 10 次、3 分钟被动恢复的半蹲练习。对同心和偏心阶段的力、功率、速度、功和冲量及其相对变化和斜率进行了组间和组内分析计算。在组间分析中,原始数据还根据体重进行了归一化处理。比较每个变量的相对变化:结果:男性在整组运动中表现出更大和更早的成绩下降(P < .05;ηp2 ≥ 0.08),但在按体重归一化后,这些差异并不一致(P > .05;ηp2 ≤ 0.05)。无论性别和阶段如何,组内分析表明,最后一组的相对变化较大(P ≤ .03;ηp2 ≥ 0.14),功率是检测成绩下降最敏感的变量(P ≤ .04;ηp2 = 0.49):结论:如果不考虑身体尺寸,在使用 FD 的最大间歇疲劳方案中,女性的疲劳动力学比男性慢且延迟。就训练而言,力量似乎是检测成绩下降的最敏感和最具鉴别力的变量:临床意义:在比较男女间歇性疲劳训练时,身体尺寸是一个必须考虑的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach is an indispensable resource for all medical professionals involved in the training and care of the competitive or recreational athlete, including primary care physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, athletic trainers and other medical and health care professionals. Published bimonthly, Sports Health is a collaborative publication from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA), and the Sports Physical Therapy Section (SPTS). The journal publishes review articles, original research articles, case studies, images, short updates, legal briefs, editorials, and letters to the editor. Topics include: -Sports Injury and Treatment -Care of the Athlete -Athlete Rehabilitation -Medical Issues in the Athlete -Surgical Techniques in Sports Medicine -Case Studies in Sports Medicine -Images in Sports Medicine -Legal Issues -Pediatric Athletes -General Sports Trauma -Sports Psychology
期刊最新文献
Are There Differences Between Sexes in Performance-Related Variables During a Maximal Intermittent Flywheel Test? Effect of Taurine Combined With Creatine on Repeated Sprinting Ability After Exhaustive Exercise Under Hot and Humid Conditions. Reference Values and Construct Validity for 4 Upper Limb Physical Performance Tests in Junior Tennis Players. Delineating the Role of Inter-Repetition Interval in the Relationship between Maximum Repetitions to Failure or Repetitions in Reserve and Movement Velocity. Sex-Based Comparisons of Hamstrings-to-Quadriceps Ratio Across the Velocity Spectrum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1