Simulating Bloch Points Using Micromagnetic and Heisenberg Models

IF 2.1 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC IEEE Transactions on Magnetics Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1109/TMAG.2024.3510934
Thomas Brian Winkler;Marijan Beg;Martin Lang;Mathias Kläui;Hans Fangohr
{"title":"Simulating Bloch Points Using Micromagnetic and Heisenberg Models","authors":"Thomas Brian Winkler;Marijan Beg;Martin Lang;Mathias Kläui;Hans Fangohr","doi":"10.1109/TMAG.2024.3510934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Magnetic Bloch points (BPs) are highly confined magnetization configurations, which often occur in transient spin dynamics processes. However, opposing chiralities of adjacent layers, for instance, in a FeGe bilayer stack, can stabilize such magnetic BPs at the layer interface. These BP configurations are metastable and consist of two coupled vortices (one in each layer) with the same circulation and opposite polarization. Each vortex is stabilized by opposite sign Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions (DMIs). An open question, from a methodological point of view, is whether the Heisenberg (HB) model approach (atomistic model) is to be used to study such systems or if the computationally more efficient micromagnetic (MM) models can be used and still obtain robust results. We are modeling and comparing the energetics and dynamics of a stable BP obtained using both HB and MM approaches. We find that an MM description of a stable BP leads qualitatively to the same results as the HB description and that an appropriate mesh discretization plays a more important role than the chosen model. Furthermore, we study the dynamics by shifting the BP with an applied in-plane (IP) field and investigating the relaxation after switching the field off abruptly. The precessional motion of coupled vortices in a BP state can be drastically reduced compared to a classical vortex (CV), which may also be an interesting feature for fast and efficient devices. A recent study has shown that a bilayer stack hosting BPs can be used to store information.","PeriodicalId":13405,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Magnetics","volume":"61 3","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Magnetics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10778603/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Magnetic Bloch points (BPs) are highly confined magnetization configurations, which often occur in transient spin dynamics processes. However, opposing chiralities of adjacent layers, for instance, in a FeGe bilayer stack, can stabilize such magnetic BPs at the layer interface. These BP configurations are metastable and consist of two coupled vortices (one in each layer) with the same circulation and opposite polarization. Each vortex is stabilized by opposite sign Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions (DMIs). An open question, from a methodological point of view, is whether the Heisenberg (HB) model approach (atomistic model) is to be used to study such systems or if the computationally more efficient micromagnetic (MM) models can be used and still obtain robust results. We are modeling and comparing the energetics and dynamics of a stable BP obtained using both HB and MM approaches. We find that an MM description of a stable BP leads qualitatively to the same results as the HB description and that an appropriate mesh discretization plays a more important role than the chosen model. Furthermore, we study the dynamics by shifting the BP with an applied in-plane (IP) field and investigating the relaxation after switching the field off abruptly. The precessional motion of coupled vortices in a BP state can be drastically reduced compared to a classical vortex (CV), which may also be an interesting feature for fast and efficient devices. A recent study has shown that a bilayer stack hosting BPs can be used to store information.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
565
审稿时长
4.1 months
期刊介绍: Science and technology related to the basic physics and engineering of magnetism, magnetic materials, applied magnetics, magnetic devices, and magnetic data storage. The IEEE Transactions on Magnetics publishes scholarly articles of archival value as well as tutorial expositions and critical reviews of classical subjects and topics of current interest.
期刊最新文献
Front Cover Table of Contents IEEE Transactions on Magnetics Institutional Listings IEEE Transactions on Magnetics Publication Information IEEE Magnetics Society Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1