Benchmark of Coacervate Formation and Mechanism Exploration Using the Martini Force Field.

IF 5.7 1区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01571
Rongrong Zou, Yiwei Wang, Xiu Zhang, Yeqiang Zhou, Yang Liu, Mingming Ding
{"title":"Benchmark of Coacervate Formation and Mechanism Exploration Using the Martini Force Field.","authors":"Rongrong Zou, Yiwei Wang, Xiu Zhang, Yeqiang Zhou, Yang Liu, Mingming Ding","doi":"10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peptide-based coacervates are crucial for drug delivery due to their biocompatibility, versatility, high drug loading capacity, and cell penetration rates; however, their stability mechanism and phase behavior are not fully understood. Additionally, although Martini is one of the most famous force fields capable of describing coacervate formation with molecular details, a comprehensive benchmark of its accuracy has not been conducted. This research utilized the Martini 3.0 force field and machine learning algorithms to explore representative peptide-based coacervates, including those composed of polyaspartate (PAsp)/polyarginine (PArg), rmfp-1, sticker-and-spacer small molecules, and HBpep molecules. We identified key coacervate formation driving forces such as Coulomb, cation-π, and π-π interactions and established three criteria for determining coacervate formation in simulations. The results also indicate that while Martini 3.0 accurately captures coacervate formation trends, it tends to underestimate Coulomb interactions and overestimate π-π interactions. What is more, our study on drug encapsulation of HBpep and its derivative coacervates suggested that most loaded drugs were distributed on surfaces of HBpep clusters, awaiting experimental validation. This study employs simulation to enhance understanding of peptide-based coacervate phase behavior and stability mechanisms while also benchmarking Martini 3.0, thereby providing fundamental insights for future experimental and simulation investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":45,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01571","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peptide-based coacervates are crucial for drug delivery due to their biocompatibility, versatility, high drug loading capacity, and cell penetration rates; however, their stability mechanism and phase behavior are not fully understood. Additionally, although Martini is one of the most famous force fields capable of describing coacervate formation with molecular details, a comprehensive benchmark of its accuracy has not been conducted. This research utilized the Martini 3.0 force field and machine learning algorithms to explore representative peptide-based coacervates, including those composed of polyaspartate (PAsp)/polyarginine (PArg), rmfp-1, sticker-and-spacer small molecules, and HBpep molecules. We identified key coacervate formation driving forces such as Coulomb, cation-π, and π-π interactions and established three criteria for determining coacervate formation in simulations. The results also indicate that while Martini 3.0 accurately captures coacervate formation trends, it tends to underestimate Coulomb interactions and overestimate π-π interactions. What is more, our study on drug encapsulation of HBpep and its derivative coacervates suggested that most loaded drugs were distributed on surfaces of HBpep clusters, awaiting experimental validation. This study employs simulation to enhance understanding of peptide-based coacervate phase behavior and stability mechanisms while also benchmarking Martini 3.0, thereby providing fundamental insights for future experimental and simulation investigations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用马蒂尼力场探索凝聚态形成的基准和机制
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
16.40%
发文量
568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation invites new and original contributions with the understanding that, if accepted, they will not be published elsewhere. Papers reporting new theories, methodology, and/or important applications in quantum electronic structure, molecular dynamics, and statistical mechanics are appropriate for submission to this Journal. Specific topics include advances in or applications of ab initio quantum mechanics, density functional theory, design and properties of new materials, surface science, Monte Carlo simulations, solvation models, QM/MM calculations, biomolecular structure prediction, and molecular dynamics in the broadest sense including gas-phase dynamics, ab initio dynamics, biomolecular dynamics, and protein folding. The Journal does not consider papers that are straightforward applications of known methods including DFT and molecular dynamics. The Journal favors submissions that include advances in theory or methodology with applications to compelling problems.
期刊最新文献
Efficient Grouped-Bath Ansatz for Spin-Flip Nonorthogonal Configuration Interaction in Transition-Metal Charge-Transfer Complexes. A Three-Tiered Hierarchical Computational Framework Bridging Molecular Systems and Junction-Level Charge Transport. Frozen-Core Analytical Gradients within the Adiabatic Connection Random-Phase Approximation from an Extended Lagrangian. Parallelization of Two-Electron Integrals in Spin-Free Infinite-Order Two-Component Hamiltonian. Velocity Jumps for Molecular Dynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1