Byung Woo Cho, Hyoung-Taek Hong, Yong-Gon Koh, Kwan Kyu Park, Kyoung-Tak Kang
{"title":"Comparative Study on Three Different Designs of Locking Mechanisms in Total Knee Arthroplasty.","authors":"Byung Woo Cho, Hyoung-Taek Hong, Yong-Gon Koh, Kwan Kyu Park, Kyoung-Tak Kang","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering12020169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The locking mechanism of the fixed-bearing tibial insert is a crucial factor in total knee arthroplasty. Previous studies have predominantly been retrieval-based, with no research examining the forces required for disassembly and assembly based on the design of the tibial insert's locking mechanism. This study aimed to measure the disassembly and assembly forces of three different locking mechanism designs. Group 1 featured a dovetail design, Group 2 had a peripheral rim design, and Group 3 combined a snap-fit mechanism with a dovetail design. Among the groups, Group 1 exhibited the highest disassembly force (379 ± 42 N), followed by Group 3 (342 ± 58) and then Group 2 (269 ± 18). Similarly, Group 1 also demonstrated the highest assembly force (71 ± 3); however, Group 3 showed a lower assembly force (48.7 ± 2.1) compared to Group 2 (49.7 ± 1.5). These results suggest that design modifications can produce mechanisms requiring minimal assembly force while maintaining strong resistance to disassembly. Due to its snap-pit structure, Group 3 exhibited the lowest assembly force while utilizing the dovetail mechanism to demonstrate a strong disassembly force. The rigorous analysis and robust methodology employed in this study ensure the reliability of the findings, which can serve as a reference for future research and development in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11852057/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12020169","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The locking mechanism of the fixed-bearing tibial insert is a crucial factor in total knee arthroplasty. Previous studies have predominantly been retrieval-based, with no research examining the forces required for disassembly and assembly based on the design of the tibial insert's locking mechanism. This study aimed to measure the disassembly and assembly forces of three different locking mechanism designs. Group 1 featured a dovetail design, Group 2 had a peripheral rim design, and Group 3 combined a snap-fit mechanism with a dovetail design. Among the groups, Group 1 exhibited the highest disassembly force (379 ± 42 N), followed by Group 3 (342 ± 58) and then Group 2 (269 ± 18). Similarly, Group 1 also demonstrated the highest assembly force (71 ± 3); however, Group 3 showed a lower assembly force (48.7 ± 2.1) compared to Group 2 (49.7 ± 1.5). These results suggest that design modifications can produce mechanisms requiring minimal assembly force while maintaining strong resistance to disassembly. Due to its snap-pit structure, Group 3 exhibited the lowest assembly force while utilizing the dovetail mechanism to demonstrate a strong disassembly force. The rigorous analysis and robust methodology employed in this study ensure the reliability of the findings, which can serve as a reference for future research and development in this field.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering