Prey or protection? Access to food alters individual responses to competition in black widow spiders.

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioral Ecology Pub Date : 2025-02-06 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1093/beheco/araf011
Tom Ratz, Pierre-Olivier Montiglio
{"title":"Prey or protection? Access to food alters individual responses to competition in black widow spiders.","authors":"Tom Ratz, Pierre-Olivier Montiglio","doi":"10.1093/beheco/araf011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Animals influence the phenotype and reproductive success of their conspecifics through competitive interactions. Such effects of competition can alter the intensity of selection and ultimately change the rate of evolution. However, the magnitude of the effects of competition, and their evolutionary impact, should vary depending on environmental conditions and individual responses among competitors. We tested whether a key environmental variable, resource availability, affects the response to competition in black widow spiders by manipulating access to prey and the level of competition. We examined if focal spiders modify their web structure and aggressiveness towards prey stimuli when a competitor is present, and whether these responses depend on prior prey access. We also tested if any effects of competition vary with individual differences among competitors. Access to resources changed how individuals respond to competition. Spiders with limited access to prey were less likely to attack prey stimuli in the presence of a conspecific competitor than spiders with greater access to prey, suggesting that limiting resources hinders competitive responses. In contrast, all spiders built better-protected webs in the presence of competitors, regardless of prior access to prey. Crucially, these responses differed among focal spiders and depended on individual competitors. Our findings highlight the importance of environmental conditions and individual differences in mediating the impact of social interactions on phenotypes and eventually on their evolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":8840,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology","volume":"36 2","pages":"araf011"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11851065/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/araf011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animals influence the phenotype and reproductive success of their conspecifics through competitive interactions. Such effects of competition can alter the intensity of selection and ultimately change the rate of evolution. However, the magnitude of the effects of competition, and their evolutionary impact, should vary depending on environmental conditions and individual responses among competitors. We tested whether a key environmental variable, resource availability, affects the response to competition in black widow spiders by manipulating access to prey and the level of competition. We examined if focal spiders modify their web structure and aggressiveness towards prey stimuli when a competitor is present, and whether these responses depend on prior prey access. We also tested if any effects of competition vary with individual differences among competitors. Access to resources changed how individuals respond to competition. Spiders with limited access to prey were less likely to attack prey stimuli in the presence of a conspecific competitor than spiders with greater access to prey, suggesting that limiting resources hinders competitive responses. In contrast, all spiders built better-protected webs in the presence of competitors, regardless of prior access to prey. Crucially, these responses differed among focal spiders and depended on individual competitors. Our findings highlight the importance of environmental conditions and individual differences in mediating the impact of social interactions on phenotypes and eventually on their evolution.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
猎物还是保护?获取食物会改变黑寡妇蜘蛛个体对竞争的反应。
动物通过竞争相互作用影响同种的表型和繁殖成功。竞争的这种影响可以改变选择的强度,最终改变进化的速度。然而,竞争的影响程度及其对进化的影响,应根据环境条件和竞争者之间的个体反应而有所不同。我们测试了一个关键的环境变量,资源可用性,是否通过操纵猎物的获取和竞争水平来影响黑寡妇蜘蛛对竞争的反应。我们研究了当竞争对手存在时,焦点蜘蛛是否会改变它们的网结构和对猎物刺激的攻击性,以及这些反应是否取决于先前的猎物访问。我们还测试了竞争的影响是否会随着竞争对手的个体差异而变化。资源的获取改变了个体对竞争的反应。与有更多机会接触猎物的蜘蛛相比,有有限机会接触猎物的蜘蛛更不可能在有同种竞争者的情况下攻击猎物刺激,这表明有限的资源阻碍了竞争反应。相比之下,所有的蜘蛛在有竞争对手的情况下都能织出更好的保护网,而不管它们是否能先获得猎物。至关重要的是,这些反应在焦点蜘蛛之间是不同的,并且取决于个体竞争对手。我们的研究结果强调了环境条件和个体差异在调节社会互动对表型的影响以及最终对其进化的影响中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Ecology
Behavioral Ecology 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Studies on the whole range of behaving organisms, including plants, invertebrates, vertebrates, and humans, are included. Behavioral Ecology construes the field in its broadest sense to include 1) the use of ecological and evolutionary processes to explain the occurrence and adaptive significance of behavior patterns; 2) the use of behavioral processes to predict ecological patterns, and 3) empirical, comparative analyses relating behavior to the environment in which it occurs.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Long-term fitness effects of the early-life environment in a wild bird population. Chemical cues facilitate foraging across the water-land interface in a resident predatory fish. A cross-taxonomic explanatory framework for mobbing behavior. Frequency masking drives species-specific temporal avoidance strategies in boreal songbirds. Personality variation in a marine snail and heterogeneous selection in natural populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1