{"title":"A Comprehensive AI Framework for Superior Diagnosis, Cranial Reconstruction, and Implant Generation for Diverse Cranial Defects.","authors":"Mamta Juneja, Ishaan Singla, Aditya Poddar, Nitin Pandey, Aparna Goel, Agrima Sudhir, Pankhuri Bhatia, Gurzafar Singh, Maanya Kharbanda, Amanpreet Kaur, Ira Bhatia, Vipin Gupta, Sukhdeep Singh Dhami, Yvonne Reinwald, Prashant Jindal, Philip Breedon","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering12020188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cranioplasty enables the restoration of cranial defects caused by traumatic injuries, brain tumour excisions, or decompressive craniectomies. Conventional methods rely on Computer-Aided Design (CAD) for implant design, which requires significant resources and expertise. Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have improved Computer-Aided Diagnostic systems for accurate and faster cranial reconstruction and implant generation procedures. However, these face inherent limitations, including the limited availability of diverse datasets covering different defect shapes spanning various locations, absence of a comprehensive pipeline integrating the preprocessing of medical images, cranial reconstruction, and implant generation, along with mechanical testing and validation. The proposed framework incorporates a robust preprocessing pipeline for easier processing of Computed Tomography (CT) images through data conversion, denoising, Connected Component Analysis (CCA), and image alignment. At its core is CRIGNet (Cranial Reconstruction and Implant Generation Network), a novel deep learning model rigorously trained on a diverse dataset of 2160 images, which was prepared by simulating cylindrical, cubical, spherical, and triangular prism-shaped defects across five skull regions, ensuring robustness in diagnosing a wide variety of defect patterns. CRIGNet achieved an exceptional reconstruction accuracy with a Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 0.99, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient (JSC) of 0.98, and Hausdorff distance (HD) of 4.63 mm. The generated implants showed superior geometric accuracy, load-bearing capacity, and gap-free fitment in the defected skull compared to CAD-generated implants. Also, this framework reduced the implant generation processing time from 40-45 min (CAD) to 25-30 s, suggesting its application for a faster turnaround time, enabling decisive clinical support systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11851381/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12020188","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cranioplasty enables the restoration of cranial defects caused by traumatic injuries, brain tumour excisions, or decompressive craniectomies. Conventional methods rely on Computer-Aided Design (CAD) for implant design, which requires significant resources and expertise. Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have improved Computer-Aided Diagnostic systems for accurate and faster cranial reconstruction and implant generation procedures. However, these face inherent limitations, including the limited availability of diverse datasets covering different defect shapes spanning various locations, absence of a comprehensive pipeline integrating the preprocessing of medical images, cranial reconstruction, and implant generation, along with mechanical testing and validation. The proposed framework incorporates a robust preprocessing pipeline for easier processing of Computed Tomography (CT) images through data conversion, denoising, Connected Component Analysis (CCA), and image alignment. At its core is CRIGNet (Cranial Reconstruction and Implant Generation Network), a novel deep learning model rigorously trained on a diverse dataset of 2160 images, which was prepared by simulating cylindrical, cubical, spherical, and triangular prism-shaped defects across five skull regions, ensuring robustness in diagnosing a wide variety of defect patterns. CRIGNet achieved an exceptional reconstruction accuracy with a Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 0.99, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient (JSC) of 0.98, and Hausdorff distance (HD) of 4.63 mm. The generated implants showed superior geometric accuracy, load-bearing capacity, and gap-free fitment in the defected skull compared to CAD-generated implants. Also, this framework reduced the implant generation processing time from 40-45 min (CAD) to 25-30 s, suggesting its application for a faster turnaround time, enabling decisive clinical support systems.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering